DBS and Levodopa for Treating Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

March 11, 2024 updated by: Ilaria Cani, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna

Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation and Levodopa on Freezing of Gait in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: a Comparative Study

Freezing of gait (FoG) is a complex symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) that cause falls and disability in PD patients, heavily affect patients' autonomy and quality of life. Gait disturbances and FoG are difficult to manage as they usually do not complete respond to both dopaminergic treatment and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). One therapeutic strategy suggested in literature for improving gait disturbances is to increase the dose of dopaminergic drugs according to the hypothesis of pseudo-ON-freezing. The pseudo-ON-FoG in patients treated with STN-DBS can easily occur as the result of a suboptimal stimulation or the consequence of a post-operative reduction of the dopaminergic therapy. Therefore, it is reasonable hypothesize both the increase of stimulation and levodopa as good therapeutic strategies to improve pseudo-ON-FoG. At present there are no evidence for suppose that one option is better than the other, even though two recent studies on gait analysis reported a positive additive effect of levodopa therapy on gait parameters in patients treated with STN-DBS.

In this study, the investigators aim to objectively evaluating the improvement of FoG in PD patients treated with STN-DBS at different treatment conditions consisting of increased intensity of stimulation or higher dosage of levodopa.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a cross-over, blind, randomized study to evaluate the improvement of FoG in a group of PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS by increasing the intensity of stimulation (STIM plus) or administering a higher dose of levodopa (MED plus).

Patient will be videorecorded for evaluation of freezing episodes and gait cinematic parameters by means of 3 wearable inertial sensors on the feet and at lumbar level during a standardized walking protocol including: Timed Up and Go, Turn 360°, Gait 18 m and a Complex task in single task and dual task (serial-3 subtractions) conditions. In each condition, Tinetti scale, Trail Making Test, alternate fluency test, Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and MDS Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) will be also perform.

In addition, other demographic and clinical information such as age, sex, MMSE, MoCA, New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Falls Efficacy Scale will be collected.

The primary endpoint of this study is to investigate the efficacy of increasing intensity of stimulation (STIM plus) or levodopa (MED plus) on freezing of gait (FOG).

Secondary outcome measures include cinematic gait parameters, global motor outcomes and cognitive functions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy, 40139
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giovanna Calandra Buonaura, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ilaria Cani, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carlo Alberto Artusi, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Giulia Giannini, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Parkinson's disease treated with STN-DBS who achieved a good control of motor fluctuations and cardinal motor symptoms (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor)
  • History of FoG in daily-ON condition after optimal DBS programming, defined by a score of 1 on Question 1 and score ≥ 2 on Question 2 of the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to walk independently for 10 meters.
  • limited therapeutic windows of stimulation without the possibility of increase the intensity of stimulation of 0,5 mA for the appearance of side effects
  • previous evidence of severe adverse effects with high levodopa dose ore increased STN-DBS intensity, such as psychosis, hallucinations, painful dyskinesias, severe hypotension, digestive symptoms.
  • dementia (MMSE score ≤ 18)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: STIM ON plus/MED ON plus

Patients were evaluated in two following morning sessions under different treatment conditions:

  1. STIM ON plus (intervention 1)
  2. MED ON plus (intervention 2)
Device: STIM ON plus
increase of intensity of stimulation of 0.5 mA bilaterally
Drug: MED ON plus
administration of a 2x levodopa morning dose
Active Comparator: MED ON plus/STIM ON plus

Patients were evaluated in two following morning sessions under different treatment conditions:

  1. MED ON plus (intervention 2)
  2. STIM ON plus (intervention 1)
Device: STIM ON plus
increase of intensity of stimulation of 0.5 mA bilaterally
Drug: MED ON plus
administration of a 2x levodopa morning dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time spent with FOG during protocol
Time Frame: immediate post monitoring
Video-assessed reduction in the total time of FoG during the standardize walking protocol in MED ON plus or STIM ON plus condition compared to baseline.
immediate post monitoring

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait performance
Time Frame: immediate post monitoring
Changes in gait parameters measured by a system of 3 wearable inertial sensors, including: gait speed, stride lenght, number of step, cadence, gait variability, left-right asymmetry during MED ON plus or STIM ON plus protocol compared to baseline.
immediate post monitoring
MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III
Time Frame: immediate post monitoring
Change in items 3.10 and 3.11 MDS UPDRS part III and total score between MED ON plus or STIM ON plus condition and baseline.
immediate post monitoring
Patient global impression of change (PGI-C)
Time Frame: immediate post monitoring
Change in PGI-C scores on MED ON plus or STIM ON plus condition compared to baseline.
immediate post monitoring
Trail Making test A and B
Time Frame: immediate post monitoring
Change in Trail Making test A and B scores during MED ON plus or STIM ON plus protocol compared to baseline.
immediate post monitoring
Phonemic/Semantic alternate Fluency test
Time Frame: immediate post monitoring
Change in during Phonemic/Semantic alternate Fluency test scores between MED ON plus or STIM ON plus condition and baseline.
immediate post monitoring

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ilaria Cani, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DBS-FOG 2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on STIM ON plus

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings