Neuromodulation With Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation

March 18, 2026 updated by: Madison Simons, The Cleveland Clinic

Neuromodulation With Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation for Adults With Gastroparesis Like Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study

The IB-Stim is the first device to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of functional abdominal pain in adolescents aged 11-18 with IBS. However, the efficacy of Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) in adults with gastroparesis like symptoms (GPLS) is not currently known. This study is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study evaluating the efficacy of PENFS using IB-Stim in adult patients with GPLS. A secondary aim will be to assess whether treatment with PENFS is associated with changes in autonomic function via heart rate variability.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide written, informed consent
  • Patients who meet Rome IV criteria for Functional Dyspepsia (FD), with or without a delay in gastric emptying:

    • One or more of the following: Bothersome postprandial fullness, Bothersome early satiation, Bothersome epigastric pain, Bothersome epigastric burning
    • No evidence of structural disease that is likely to explain the symptoms
    • Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis
  • Average daily worst abdominal pain score between 4 and 8 (on a 0-10-point rating scale) during the screening period. A minimum reporting of abdominal pain will be required for 5/7 days in the baseline period.
  • Minimum of 2 days of abdominal pain/week prior to starting trial.
  • At least moderate symptom severity with a GCSI score of at least 2.0 during screening
  • If receiving pharmacologic therapy for abdominal pain associated with GPLS, doses must be stable for at least 60 days prior to randomization.
  • If receiving pharmacologic therapy for GPLS that does not have an effect on abdominal pain, doses must be stable for at least 30 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 18 years or over the age of 60 years
  • Patients who cannot provide informed consent or do not speak English
  • Co-morbid, organic medical conditions associated with abdominal pain, including: Inflammatory bowel disease, chronic liver disease, peptic ulcer disease, celiac disease, diverticulitis, appendicitis, colorectal cancer, endometriosis, pregnancy, other intestinal or extra-intestinal malignancies. Patients with overlapping functional GI disorders (i.e. IBS) will not be excluded as long as GPLS is their predominant disorder
  • Patients prescribed GLP-1s
  • History of surgery involving Cranial Nerves V, VII, IX, or X.
  • History of abdominal surgeries other than appendectomy or cholecystectomy at least 6 months before the screening visit.
  • Patients with chronic opioid, benzodiazepine, or illicit substance use within the last 6 months.
  • Patients with underlying neurologic conditions, including history of: seizures, CVA, uncontrolled migraines, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis
  • Patients with severe, uncontrolled psychiatric conditions, including severe major depression, psychosis, dissociative episodes, etc.
  • Patients with dermatologic conditions affecting the ear, face, or neck region (i.e. psoriasis), or with cuts or abrasions to the external ear that would interfere with needle placement
  • Patients with hemophilia or other bleeding disorders
  • Patients with any implanted electrical device
  • Patients who are known to be pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active PENFS Device
Participants in this arm have active PENFS device stimulation
The electrode/needle arrays are placed according to the individual's arterial and cranial nerve anatomy. The exact location of the placement may vary slightly from person to person but is determined by both knowledge of auricular neuro-anatomy and visualization of the neurovascular bundles by transillumination (NEURAXIS, Versailles, IN, USA). The points will be targeted by four-point electrical stimulation using the device after carefully disinfecting the ear. The small device will be positioned and secured behind the ear similar to a hearing aid, which may be covered by hair. Neurostimulation will be delivered below sensation threshold for 5 consecutive days. The device will be applied by a trained provider. A total of 4 weeks of neurostimulation will be performed
Sham Comparator: Control Arm
Participants in this arm have inactive PENFS device
This control device will be identical in every way to the active device except it will lack the battery. The devices will be "made to order" when requested by the PI and will be shipped packaged as above. Both the subjects and the doctors placing the devices will be blinded, as the treatment and inactive devices will look identical with identical packaging and placement procedures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in abdominal pain scores (on a 0-10 point rating scale, where 10 is the worst) from Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: From Baseline through Week 4
The primary goal of the analysis plan will be to test the effectiveness of IB-Stim neurostimulation versus sham in decreasing abdominal pain scores.
From Baseline through Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25-827

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroparesis Like Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Activated IB-Stim Device

Subscribe