Abrocitinib Taiwan Treatment Pattern and Real World Study in ATopiC Dermatitis (ATTRACT Registry) (ATTRACT)

September 2, 2025 updated by: Pfizer

The Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Patients Receiving Abrocitinib

This study is to describe the real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in moderate-to-severe AD patients receiving abrocitinib over a 12-month observation period, and to describe patient demographic and baseline characteristics.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 83301
        • Recruiting
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung
      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 807377
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
      • New Taipei City, Taiwan, 23561
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10449
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Mackay Memorial Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Recruiting
        • NTUH
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11490, R.O.C.
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tri-Service General Hospital
      • Taoyuan District, Taiwan, 333
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chang Gung Hospital Linkou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult and pediatric AD patients ≥12 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis receiving abrocitinib.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:

  1. Patients aged ≥12 years
  2. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD as assessed by the physician
  3. Patients for whom the physician's decision has been made to newly prescribe abrocitinib in usual clinical practice conditions
  4. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent/assent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study:

  1. Any prior use of abrocitinib
  2. Simultaneous participation in a study that includes administration of any investigational drug or procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 75% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) Response at Week 2, 12, 52
Time Frame: Week 2, 12, 52
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
Week 2, 12, 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 90% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) Response at Week 2, 12, 52
Time Frame: Week 2, 12, 52
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
Week 2, 12, 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 12, 52
Time Frame: Week 2, 12, 52
IGA assesses severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded sole, palms and scalp.
Week 2, 12, 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Abrocitinib Treatment: All Participants
Time Frame: During post-index period (12 months duration post index date)
Duration of treatment with abrocitinib was the time from date of start of abrocitinib treatment to date of end of abrocitinib treatment or of latest follow-up if not suspended.
During post-index period (12 months duration post index date)
Demographic and baseline characteristics
Time Frame: During pre-index period
During pre-index period
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions(head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in each 4 body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
IGA assesses severity of participant's AD on a 5 point scale. 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting and 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Higher scores indicating more severity of AD. Assessment excluded soles, palms and scalp.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
Change from baseline of Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) score at Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) is a brief patient self-administered instrument designed and validated to assess patient-perceived AD control; AD symptoms and impacts are evaluated over the past week, including overall severity of symptoms, days with intense episodes of itching, intensity of bother, problem with sleep, impact on daily activities, and impact on mood or emotions
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
The DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Percentage Change From Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using a horizontal NRS. Participants at specified time points were asked the following question: "How would you rate your itch due to AD at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" The scale ranged from 0-10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Points Reduction in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using a horizontal NRS. Participants at specified time points were asked the following question: "How would you rate your itch due to AD at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" The scale ranged from 0-10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using a horizontal NRS. Participants at specified time points were asked the following question: "How would you rate your itch due to AD at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" The scale ranged from 0-10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B7451114
  • NCT06353087 (Registry Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Diseases

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings