Artificial Intelligence-enabled ECG Detection of Congenital Heart Disease in Children: a Novel Diagnostic Tool (AI-ECG-CHD)

July 28, 2026 updated by: Jing Sun, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital disease in children. The early detection, diagnosis and treatment of CHD in children is of great significance to improve the prognosis and reduce the mortality of children, but the current screening methods have limitations. Electrocardiogram (ECG), as an economical and rapid means of heart disease detection, has a very important value in the auxiliary diagnosis of CHD.Big data and deep learning technologies in artificial intelligence (AI) have shown great potential in the medical field. The advent of the big data era provides rich data resources for the in-depth study of CHD ECG signals in children. The development of deep learning technology, especially the breakthrough in the field of image recognition, provides a strong technical support for the intelligent analysis of electrocardiogram. The particularity of children electrocardiogram requires the development of a special algorithm model. At present, the research on the application of deep learning models to identify children's electrocardiograms is limited, and the training and verification from large data sets are lacking. Based on the Chinese Congenital Heart Disease Collaborative Research Network, this project aims to integrate data and deep learning technology to develop a set of intelligent electrocardiogram assisted diagnosis system (CHD-ECG AI system) suitable for children with CHD, so as to improve the early detection rate of CHD and improve the efficiency of congenital heart disease screening.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
        • Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Our dataset consisted of retrospective data from patients aged under 18 years who had complete ECG, echocardiography, examination and medical history information.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The age of first visit was from 3 months after birth to 18 years old;
  • In the atrial septal defect group, patients in the case group were required to complete ECG examination and confirmed by careful cardiac ultrasonography that there was a simple secondary atrial septal defect without other complex heart malformations (such as ectopic pulmonary vein drainage, trunk conus artery malformation, interrupted aortic arch, primary pulmonary hypertension, etc.). In the pulmonary hypertension group, the presence of CHD associated pulmonary hypertension was confirmed by careful cardiac ultrasonography examination. The control group was the patients with normal intracardiac structure examined by cardiac ultrasonography. The time interval between ECG examination and echocardiography examination of all patients was < 1 month;
  • No major illness at the time of initial visit (non-life-threatening organic disease caused by congenital heart disease).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age of first visit < 3 months or > 18 years old;
  • Complicated congenital heart disease (such as anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, trunk conus artery malformation, interrupted aortic arch, primary pulmonary hypertension, etc.);
  • The clinical information is incomplete, including the lack of ECG or echocardiography information, or the time interval between ECG and echocardiography is > 1 month;
  • Life-threatening diseases associated with other organ systems;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Control
Pulmonary hypertension
Atrial septal defect

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Large-scale ECG database for children
Time Frame: 2024.01.01-2024.12.30
The ECG data of children from multiple centers were collected and collated, including common and rare CHD types and normal children's ECG, to construct a large-scale ECG database covering different ages and CHD diseases. In addition, the original ECG data (digital signals or ECG images) will be pre-processed to make it conform to the input standards of deep learning models, so as to improve the quality and efficiency of subsequent model training and reduce the heterogeneity of multi-center ECG data.
2024.01.01-2024.12.30
Artificial intelligence-assisted electrocardiogram model for CHD in Children
Time Frame: 2024.01.01-2025.12.30
The deep neural network model will be established based on algorithms such as convolutional neural network, transformers and Autoencoders, and will be trained and verified in the multi-center children's ECG dataset (85%) established based on CCHDnet, so as to continuously optimize the model and improve the diagnostic performance of the model. Further, the deep learning model based on the single disease of CHD will be integrated, and the CHD-ECG AI system will be built, and the model will eventually automatically extract and recognize the general basic information such as the age and gender of the child through the ECG, and then predict and classify the potential CHD characteristics in the ECG based on this. The research group initially selected the representative subtypes of CHD - atrial septal defect and pulmonary hypertension as the initial direction of exploration.
2024.01.01-2025.12.30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XHEC-C-2024-053-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings