Hemostatic Forceps vs. Bipolar Electrocautery Probes for High-Risk Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers
A Randomized Trial of Hemostatic Forceps Versus Bipolar Electrocautery Probes for High-Risk Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Uayporn Kaosombattwattana, MD
- Phone Number: +66619245953
- Email: Koigi214@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Bangkok
-
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
- Recruiting
- Faculty of internal medicine siriraj hospital, Mahidol university
-
Contact:
- Uayporn Kaosombatwattana
- Phone Number: +66619245953
- Email: Koigi214@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage age ≥ 18 years old
- The patient with gastroduodenal ulcer with indication for hemostatic intervention including 2.1 Forrest classification 1a (Active spurting) 2.2 Forrest classification 1b (Active oozing) 2.3 Forrest classification 2a (Non-bleeding visible vessel; NBVV) 2.4 Forrest classification 2b (Adherent clot) with lesion underneath clot which need hemostatic intervention including active spurting, active oozing or non-bleeding visible vessel
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncorrectable hemostasis laboratory including serum platelet < 50000 /mm3 or International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5
- Bleeding from cancerous gastroduodenal ulcer
- The patient with history of gastric surgery
- The patient with history of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer within 30 days prior to enrollment
- The patient with history of proton pump inhibitor allergy
- Pregnant
- The patient deny to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hemostatic forceps
Hemostatic forceps will be used for control bleeding with electrocautery unit setting: 80 W, effect 4, soft coagulation mode for 1-2 seconds.
|
The experimental device will be used for control bleeding in high risk gastroduodenal ulcers.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Bipolar electrocautery probes
Bipolar electrocautery probes will be used for control bleeding with electrocautery unit setting: effect 2, soft coagulation bipolar mode for 8-10 seconds.
|
The active comparator devices will be used for control bleeding in high risk gastroduodenal ulcers.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparing hemostatic rate between hemostatic forceps and bipolar electrocautery probes
Time Frame: During esophagogastroduodenoscopy
|
When the bleeding stopped for at least 2 minutes, it is defined as successful hemostasis.
|
During esophagogastroduodenoscopy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rebleeding rate at 7 days and 30 days after index intervention
Time Frame: 30 days
|
After primary hemostasis, patients will be follow up at 7 and 30 days for evidence of rebleeding.
|
30 days
|
|
Survival rate after intervention
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Patients who live longer than 30 days after hemostasis will be counted for survival rate.
|
30 days
|
|
Procedure time for achieving hemostasis
Time Frame: During esophagogastroduodenoscopy
|
Procedure time will be counted from the time of device insertion to the time of achieving hemostasis.
|
During esophagogastroduodenoscopy
|
|
Number of units of infused blood
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Number of red cell units which are transfused to the patients.
|
30 days
|
|
Duration of hospitalization
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The length of hospital stay.
|
30 days
|
|
Complications of hemostatic interventions
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Complications related to intervention include perforation, infection, and organ failure
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, MD, Mahidol University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):345-60; quiz 361. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.480. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
- Forrest JA, Finlayson ND, Shearman DJ. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet. 1974 Aug 17;2(7877):394-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91770-x. No abstract available.
- Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Pausawasdi N, Laosanguaneak N, Bubthamala J, Tanwandee T, Leelakusolvong S. Characteristics and outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy in the elderly. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug 28;17(32):3724-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i32.3724.
- ASGE technology committee; Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Aslanian HR, Bhutani MS, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, Melson J, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Sethi A, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT; ASGE Technology Committee Chair. Devices for endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal GI bleeding (with videos). VideoGIE. 2019 Jun 27;4(7):285-299. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.02.004. eCollection 2019 Jul.
- Asge Technology Committee; Conway JD, Adler DG, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kantsevoy SV, Kaul V, Kethu SR, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Rodriguez SA, Tierney WM. Endoscopic hemostatic devices. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 May;69(6):987-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.251. No abstract available.
- Arima S, Sakata Y, Ogata S, Tominaga N, Tsuruoka N, Mannen K, Shiraishi R, Shimoda R, Tsunada S, Sakata H, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K. Evaluation of hemostasis with soft coagulation using endoscopic hemostatic forceps in comparison with metallic hemoclips for bleeding gastric ulcers: a prospective, randomized trial. J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;45(5):501-5. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0186-8. Epub 2009 Dec 25.
- Kim JW, Jang JY, Lee CK, Shim JJ, Chang YW. Comparison of hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcer--a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):680-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391565. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
- Nunoue T, Takenaka R, Hori K, Okazaki N, Hamada K, Baba Y, Yamasaki Y, Kono Y, Seki H, Inokuchi T, Takemoto K, Taira A, Tsugeno H, Fujiki S, Kawahara Y, Okada H. A Randomized Trial of Monopolar Soft-mode Coagulation Versus Heater Probe Thermocoagulation for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;49(6):472-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000190.
- Toka B, Eminler AT, Karacaer C, Uslan MI, Koksal AS, Parlak E. Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
- Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Marmo R, Piscopo R, Orsini L, Cipolletta L. Combined epinephrine and bipolar probe coagulation vs. bipolar probe coagulation alone for bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):910-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02232-1.
- Veitch AM, Radaelli F, Alikhan R, Dumonceau JM, Eaton D, Jerrome J, Lester W, Nylander D, Thoufeeq M, Vanbiervliet G, Wilkinson JR, Van Hooft JE. Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update. Gut. 2021 Sep;70(9):1611-1628. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325184.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Si 223/2024
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.