Treatment Result of Zirconia Laminate Veneer
Surface Conditioning Effectiveness, Accuracy and Treatment Result of Zirconia Laminate Veneer
This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of the zirconia laminate veneer, a minimally invasive prosthetic restoration
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients with indications for single tooth restoration with ceramic laminate veneers are recruited for the study. These indications include spaced, discolored, malformed, root canal-treated, chipped, and mildly crowded teeth. After providing written informed consent, all patients are randomly divided into two groups in a double-blind manner (participants and the outcomes assessor) in a 1:1 ratio, including the Zirconia group (intervention) and the Lithium Disilicate group (control). Each patient's tooth is prepared and restored with the corresponding laminate veneer material, that is, zirconia and lithium disilicate.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Hanoi
-
Hanoi, Hanoi, Vietnam, 10000
- High Technical Center of Dentistry, School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spaced tooth
- Discolored tooth
- Malformed tooth
- Root canal-treated tooth
- Chipped tooth
- Mildly crowded tooth
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tooth bruxism
- Inadequate enamel for bonding
- Large restoration exists
- Bad oral habits harming restoration
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Zirconia laminate veneer
Intervention: Single-tooth restoration using zirconia ceramic laminate veneers. Procedure: Tooth preparation following standard protocols for laminate veneer placement. Fabrication of zirconia laminate veneers. Cementation of zirconia laminate veneers with appropriate bonding protocol. Follow-Up: after 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months |
Zirconia veneers are milled with computer-aided manufacturing technology from multilayered zirconia discs with shade matched with adjacent teeth. After sintering, veneer surfaces are treated with a hydrofluoric acid-nitric acid mixture. Next, veneers are cut back if necessary to provide space for characterization. Veneers are bonded with a light-cured veneer adhesive system (Relyx Veneer LC, 3M, USA). |
|
Active Comparator: Lithium Disilicate laminate veneer
Intervention: Single-tooth restoration using lithium disilicate ceramic laminate veneers. Procedure: Tooth preparation following standard protocols for laminate veneer placement. Fabrication of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Cementation of lithium disilicate laminate veneers with appropriate bonding protocol. Follow-Up: after 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months |
Lithium Disilicate veneers are milled with computer-aided manufacturing technology from lithium disilicate blocks with shade matched with adjacent teeth. After sintering, veneer surfaces are treated with hydrofluoric acid. Next, veneers are cut back if necessary to provide space for characterization. Veneers are bonded with a light-cured veneer adhesive system (Relyx Veneer LC, 3M, USA). |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal and internal fit
Time Frame: Before veneer adhesion
|
Measurement of marginal and internal fit in micrometers with silicone replica method |
Before veneer adhesion
|
|
Gingival health
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
Assessment of gingival index |
2 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Periodontal pocket
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
Measurement of periodontal pocket depth in millimeters |
2 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Evaluation criteria based on the modified United States Public Health Standard
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
Shade match, contour, fracture, loss of retention, hypersensitivity |
2 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Dental Pulp Diseases
- Tooth Diseases
- Stomatognathic System Abnormalities
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Malocclusion
- Tooth, Nonvital
- Tooth Abnormalities
- Tooth Fractures
- Tooth Avulsion
- Tooth Injuries
- Cracked Tooth Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 01050122106
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.