Clinical Evaluation of Lava Digital Veneer System (DVS) Crowns

November 27, 2024 updated by: Solventum US LLC
Study aim is to compare Lava Computer Aided Design / Computer Aided Milling Computer Aided Machining (CAD/CAM)crowns that are veneered (covered) with porcelain that has been milled using CAD/CAM, with similar CAD/CAM Lava crowns that have been veneered with a hand fabricated porcelain covering.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Veneers will be randomly allocated to study crowns. Study crowns will be evaluated over three years. The test porcelain veneer is CAD/CAM milled as a veneer shell that is then fused to the CAD/CAM milled Lava crown to make the final crown to be cemented in the patient's mouth. This may be a more predictable technique in the fabrication of Lava crowns than current conventional methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-1274
        • University of Michigan Dental School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years of age.
  • Have at least one decayed back tooth in need of a crown
  • Study tooth to be an upper or lower premolar or molar tooth/ teeth
  • Study tooth to be vital and asymptomatic at start of study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth which are non vital, have had root canal treatment
  • Teeth which are pulp capped
  • Sensitive teeth
  • Significant untreated dental disease including periodontitis and rampant decay
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients with allergies to any of the materials to be used in the study
  • Unable to attend the recall appointments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DVS veneer
veneer made by CAD/CAM method
CAD/CAM milled porcelain veneer for Lava crown
Other Names:
  • Lava digital veneer system
Active Comparator: Conventional veneer
Veneer made by laboratory technician
CAD/CAM milled Lava crown with lab fabricated veneer
Other Names:
  • Lava Crown

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Performance of Crowns Via Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Criteria
Time Frame: 1 year
Performance reported as the % of teeth with perfect (alpha/A) scores. USPHS criteria: Color Match ( A=Ideal, B=perceptible mismatch but acceptable, C=obvious mismatch and unacceptable); Margin Adaptation (A=no visible crevice, B=crevice along <50% margin>1mm depth, C=crevice along>50% margin >1mm depth); Margin discoloration (A=none, B=Surface stain non penetrating, C=Penetrating; Surface Finish (A=smooth, B=moderately uniformly rough, C=significant pitts/voids; Crown Fracture (A=none, B=small but repairable, C= coping exposed/complete delamination; Proximal Contact (A=firm resistance to floss/ideal contact, B=light resistance/variable breadth, C=open; Sensitivity (A=none, B= slight but not uncomfortable, C=severe; Caries (A=no evidence, B= evident but repairable, C=evident/not repairable.
1 year
Gingival/Periodontal Health Based on Loe & Stillness Index, 1963.
Time Frame: 1 year
Performance reported as the # of crowns exhibiting 0, 1, 2 and 3 index score. Gingival Index (0=normal, 1=mild inflammation, 2=moderate inflammation, 3=severe inflammation. Plaque Index (0= none, 1= observed only via probe at on tooth surface at gingival crest, 2=moderate accumulation along gingival margin and adjacent tooth, 3= abundant plaque along gingival margin and adjacent tooth.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

3M

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dennis Fasbinder, DDS, Univ of Michigan School of Dentistry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

January 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3M ESPE CR-10-004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decay

Clinical Trials on DVS veneer

Subscribe