Influencer Marketing: a Survey-based Experiment Among Adolescents
The Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Imagery Alongside E-cigarettes in Social Media Influencer Marketing on Perceptions of E-cigarettes Among Adolescents: a Survey-based Experiment
Adolescents (N = 664) participated in the online survey-based experiment. They were randomly shown 10 videos, featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes alongside healthy lifestyle activities (experimental group), or e-cigarette promotion alone (control). After watching each video, participants rated perceptions of influencer credibility (i.e., honesty, trustworthiness, knowledge) on the scale of 0 (e.g., dishonest) to 100 (honest).
Among all participants, harm perceptions and appeal of e-cigarettes was assessed. Susceptibility to use e-cigarettes was assessed among never users of e-cigarettes. These outcomes were then compared among participants who perceived influencers as credible and those who perceived influencers as non-credible.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
- Online survey, Qualtrics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 13-17 years of age,
- English fluency,
- Current California resident.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not meeting these criteria:
- 13-17 years of age,
- English fluency,
- Current California resident.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Videos featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes alongside healthy lifestyle activities
|
Participants watched online survey-imbedded promotional videos featuring influencers
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Videos featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes alone
|
Participants watched online survey-imbedded promotional videos featuring influencers
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Susceptibility to use e-cigarettes
Time Frame: one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
|
Susceptibility to use e-cigarettes was measured (among never-users of e-cigarettes), using the validated three-item scale adapted from PATH, and combined into one variable (α=0.93).
Consistent with prior research, the measure was dichotomized with responses "definitely not" to all items being coded as "not susceptible" and responses "probably not," "probably yes", or "definitely yes" being coded as "susceptible."
|
one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
|
|
Harm perceptions of e-cigarettes
Time Frame: one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
|
Responses to two questions adapted from PATH, "Based on the videos you just watched, do you think using e-cigarettes for vaping nicotine is harmful to your health?" "Based on the videos you just watched, do you think people harm themselves when they use e-cigarettes for vaping nicotine?"
Outcome was assessed on the 0 (Not harmful at all) - 100 (Very harmful) scale.
Since the items were closely related (α=0.87), they were combined (by summing all the non-missing values of the items) into one variable.
|
one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
|
|
Perceived appeal of e-cigarettes
Time Frame: one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
|
Responses to the following questions: using e-cigarette is:
|
one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
|
|
Perceptions of influencer credibility
Time Frame: assessed 10 times immediately after each video
|
Perceptions of influencer credibility (i.e., honesty, trustworthiness, knowledge) were assessed using a 0 (e.g., dishonest) -100 (e.g., honest) scale that has been validated in prior research.
|
assessed 10 times immediately after each video
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UP-21-00352
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.