Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SR750 in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia

April 21, 2026 updated by: Shanghai SIMR Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind and Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SR750 in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy，safety and tolerability of SR750 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Patients will receive SR750 (study drug) or placebo for 6 weeks and keep a diary of daily pain. The study duration for each patient is up to 11 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a phase 2, randomized, double-blind study comparing SR750 with placebo in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. It consists of a screening period, a double-blind treatment period, and a post-treatment safety follow-up period. Baseline pain intensity and number of paroxysms will be taken in the run-in period of screening period and will be checked for eligibility. Around 162 eligible subjects will be recruited and randomized into three arms at 1:1:1 ratio to receive SR750 high dose twice a day (BID) , SR750 low dose BID or placebo BID for 6 weeks. Subjects, investigators, all clinical study site staffs, and the Sponsor will remain blinded to treatment assignment during the study. Subjects will be asked to record the number of paroxysms of pain, severity of daily average pain of paroxysms and severity of daily worst pain in e-diary over the last 24 hours every night before going to bed. After completion of double-blind period, subjects will continue to complete the safety follow-up.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
138

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia as per International Classification of Headache Disorders third version (ICHD-3) criteria
  • Subjects must have experienced ≥3 paroxysms per day with a daily average pain sore of ≥4 and ≤8 on PI-NRS during the five days prior to randomization.
  • Willing and able to undergo washout of prohibited medication as per protocol requirements and refrain from use of the prohibited medication throughout the study period.
  • Female subjects must be non-pregnant and non-lactating.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Painful trigeminal neuropathies
  • Other pains that cannot be clearly differentiated from the pain associated with TN or may interfere with the pain assessment
  • Subjects have previously undergone microvascular decompression (MVD), sensory rhizotomy of trigeminal nerve, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous balloon compression (PBC), permanent lesion of trigeminal semilunar ganglion, botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of TN within 6 months prior to screening. Subjects with severe complication after therapeutic procedure would also be excluded.
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) or Treponema Pallidum

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Placebo
Experimental: SR750 high dose
Drug: SR750 tablet
SR750 high dose BID orally for 6 weeks
Drug: SR750 tablet
SR750 low dose BID orally for 6 weeks
Experimental: SR750 low dose
Drug: SR750 tablet
SR750 high dose BID orally for 6 weeks
Drug: SR750 tablet
SR750 low dose BID orally for 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Average Pain Score (DAPS)
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change from baseline to week 6 in the weekly average of the daily average pain score (DAPS) of paroxysms using pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS).The PI-NRS consists of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10.
up to week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of responders
Time Frame: up to week 6

Proportion of subjects who meets one of the following criteria,

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) response of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" at Week 6. Subjects will select a value to represent their overall status since the start of the study on a 7-point scale of PGIC on which 1 corresponds to "very much improved", 2 corresponds to "much improved", 3 corresponds to "slightly improved" 4 corresponds to "no change", 5 corresponds to "slightly worse", 6 corresponds to "much worse", and 7 corresponds to "very much worse".
  • A reduction of ≥2 points from baseline in mean pain score at Week 6
  • A reduction of ≥30% from baseline in mean pain score at Week 6
  • A reduction of ≥50% from baseline in mean pain score at Week 6
  • A reduction of ≥30% from baseline in mean number of paroxysms at Week 6
  • A reduction of ≥50% from baseline in mean number of paroxysms at Week 6
  • A reduction of ≥30% from baseline in mean worst pain score at Week 6
up to week 6
Mean number of paroxysms by week
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change from baseline in mean number of paroxysms by week
up to week 6
Proportion of subjects with continuous pain at week 6
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change of proportion from baseline
up to week 6
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change of HADS from baseline. The HADS is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of two subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A Subscale) and the other for depression (HADS-D Subscale). Each subscale consists of 7 items, and subjects will rate each item as it applies to them 0 points = absence of anxiety or depression; 3 points = severe anxiety or depression. The HADS-A Subscale analyzes generalized anxiety states, including anxious feelings, restlessness, anxious thoughts, and panic attacks. The HADS-D Subscale focuses on states of loss of interest and reduced pleasure response (reduced enjoyment mood). Each subscale will receive a score from 0 to 21, with bigger number indicating more severe symptom.
up to week 6
Use of rescue medication
Time Frame: up to week 7
Including the first time to use rescue medication, total amount and proportion
up to week 7
Mean pain score by week
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change from baseline in weekly mean pain score. The daily pain score will be measured by PI-NRS described as above.
up to week 6
Mean worst pain score by week
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change from baseline in mean worst pain score by week. The daily worst pain score will be measured by PI-NRS described as above.
up to week 6
Mean continuous pain score by week
Time Frame: up to week 6
Change from baseline in mean continuous pain score by week. The daily continuous pain score will be measured by PI-NRS described as above.
up to week 6

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to week 7
To collect the adverse events during the study
up to week 7
Plasma concentration of SR750 and its metabolite
Time Frame: up to day 43
To measure the plasma concentration of SR750 and its metabolite after dosing
up to day 43

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai SIMR Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bifa Fan, MD, China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 26, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 24, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SR750-202

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings