The Effect of Mucogyne® Ovule on Wound Healing (ORIGYNE) (ORIGYNE)

September 3, 2024 updated by: Biocodex

ORIGYNE (MUCO232) - the Effect of Mucogyne® Ovule on Wound Healing

This clinical investigation is a post-market clinical follow-up performed to confirm the performance and safety of the Mucogyne® ovule medical device in promoting the process of wound healing, when used in accordance with its approved labelling, in the context of local cervicovaginal surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
144

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult women who had undergone localized surgery (laser or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conization) for cervical or vaginal dysplasia,
  2. Is able to understand the study related information and to give a written informed consent,
  3. Has signed the informed consent form before beginning any study procedure,
  4. Has no condition that may interfere with the study assessments,
  5. Agrees not to use other vaginal products than those planned in the study protocol, during participation in the study,
  6. Is able to comply with protocol requirements and respect the conditions of the study,
  7. Affiliated to the Social Security system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous vaginal surgery within the year preceding the inclusion in the study,
  2. Known hypersensitivity to any of the medical device ingredients,
  3. Patient with local infectious lesions in the area to be repaired.
  4. Patient who had used anti-inflammatory drugs (regular intake) or anticoagulants during the month preceding the inclusion in the study,
  5. Patient who had a history of diseases known to disturb wound healing (e.g. systemic, heart, and renal diseases, coagulation disorders, immunedeficiency, connective tissue disorders, diabetes, anemia (with hemoglobin level < 9 g/dl) and hemophilia),
  6. Immunosuppressive treatment,
  7. Heavy cigarettes smoker (i.e., more than 15 cigarettes or equivalent/day, according to the patient and their documented records),
  8. Patients under judicial protection or under guardianship and patients deprived of freedom,
  9. Has any other severe chronic or acute medical or psychiatric condition that in the judgment of the Investigator, could interfere with the study assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To confirm the performance of Mucogyne® ovule in wound healing promotion
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)

The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint derived with the following criteria:

  • Inflammation evaluated with a 5-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) and not assessed,
  • Edema evaluated with a 5-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) and not assessed,
  • Abrasion evaluated with a 5-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) and not assessed,
  • Coalescence evaluated with a 3-point scale (none, partial, total) and not assessed.
  • Opening of the cervix (only for cervical wound) evaluated with a 4-point scale (closed, slightly open, open, gaping) and not assessed.
Day 0 to day 21(+10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the aspect of the epithelium 3(+1) weeks after surgery
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)
Criteria assessing the aspect of the epithelium (such as presence of mucosa, stroma, presence and quality of mucus, opening of the cervix, presence or absence of inflammation, edema, vulvo-vaginal abrasions, coalescence, adherence, leucorrhoea and bleeding at contact)
Day 0 to day 21(+10)
To assess the performance of Mucogyne® ovule in symptoms relief
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)
Vaginal symptoms (dryness, itching, burning, discharge) will be assessed by the patient using a 4-point scale (1 = absent, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) at 3 (+1) weeks after surgery
Day 0 to day 21(+10)
To assess the performance of Mucogyne® ovule in reducing postoperative side effects and complications
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)
Postoperative side-effects (i.e. postoperative bleeding, infection and impairment of daily activities, etc.) will be assessed using a questionnaire. For the assessment of hemorrhage, the amounts of bleeding will be checked with a pictorial blood assessment chart.
Day 0 to day 21(+10)
To assess change in clinical status
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)
Change in clinical status will be assessed by the Investigator using Clinical Global Impressions scale, (CGI) at 3(+1) weeks after surgery
Day 0 to day 21(+10)
To assess compliance with the Medical Device use
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)
Compliance with the Medical Device use will be assessed by number of days of use
Day 0 to day 21(+10)
To assess the safety of Mucogyne® ovule
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 21(+10)
Number, nature and characteristics of any incident reported: incidence, seriousness, severity, resolution
Day 0 to day 21(+10)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Biocodex

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MUCO232

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings