Shoulder and Neck Mobilization in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Effects of Shoulder and Neck Mobilization on Pain, Sensation and Functionality in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Meltem Işıntaş
- Phone Number: +902742652031
- Email: meltem.isintas@ksbu.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye), 43100
- Kutahya Health Sciences University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being over 18 years of age
- Diagnosed with Subacromial Impingement
- Not having received any treatment for shoulder problems in the last 6 months
- The pain has been continuing for 3 months
- Initial pain must be 4 or higher on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of surgery in the shoulder, cervical and thoracic region
- Having a shoulder problem such as a frozen shoulder or instability
- Full-thickness rotator cuff tear
- Having systemic musculoskeletal disease
- Having systemic rheumatic disease
- History of upper extremity fracture
- Diagnosed with scoliosis
- Have neurological problems
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment group
Hot packs, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise
|
Hot pack,TENS, ultrasound and exercises
|
|
Experimental: Conventional treatment + shoulder mobilization group
Hot packs, TENS, ultrasound, exercise, and shoulder mobilization
|
Hot pack,TENS, ultrasound and exercises
In the glenohumeral joint mobilization technique, distraction, anterior-posterior gliding, and inferior gliding movements will be applied.
|
|
Experimental: Conventional treatment + shoulder mobilization + neck mobilization group
Hot packs, TENS, ultrasound, exercise, and shoulder and neck mobilization
|
Hot pack,TENS, ultrasound and exercises
In the glenohumeral joint mobilization technique, distraction, anterior-posterior gliding, and inferior gliding movements will be applied.
Bridge, lateral flexion movement combined with traction, anterior-posterior gliding with traction, and lateral gliding techniques will be applied in neck mobilization.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Pain intensity will be evaluated with VAS.
VAS is a valid and reliable self-report scale consisting of a 10 cm long horizontal line, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Participants are asked to report the maximum pain they experienced in the last 24 hours.
A change of 1.5 points is considered a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the VAS.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Arm, Shoulder and Hand Problems (DASH) Questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
(DASH) questionnaire is a questionnaire that evaluates the functional level and disability of the entire upper extremity.
At least 27 out of 30 questions must be answered for the inquiry to be evaluated.
The query gives a value between 0-100.
All questions are scored from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates greater disability.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Painful arch assessment
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The patient is asked to abduct his arm as much as he can while standing or sitting.
The test is positive if the patient feels pain between 60-120° of elevation.
The sensitivity of the painful arc test performed in CNS patients was found to be 53% and the specificity was 80%.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Painless range of motion assessment
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Painless ROM evaluation will be performed in CNS patients due to the presence of a painful arch.
Pain-free ROM evaluation includes flexion and abduction movements occurring in the frontal and sagittal planes.
These movements are evaluated using a universal goniometer.
The patient is asked to actively create 2 movements in a standing or sitting position.
While performing measurements with a goniometer, the part with pain-free ROM will be noted in degrees
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Pressure-pain Threshold Assessment
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Pressure pain threshold is the most commonly used method among quantitative sensory tests.Measurements will be taken from the upper trapezius, supraspinatus, and middle deltoideus muscles.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Evaluation of Tactile Sensory Acuity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Esthesiometer measurements will be taken from the surfaces corresponding to the C5, C6, and C7 dermatomes.
To standardize the test areas, vertical lines will be drawn from the anterior, middle, and posterior edges of the acromion towards the elbow.
The test will begin at 0 mm and the distance will first be gradually increased in 5 mm increments until the participant perceives two dots instead of one.
When the participant reports detecting two dots, that distance will be recorded.
Separate evaluations will be taken from 3 regions and the results will be recorded.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Meltem Işıntaş, Kutahya Health Sciences University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024/06-29
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.