Optimization of Time Parameters of Priming iTBS for Poststroke Motor Rehabilitation (TMS)

January 3, 2026 updated by: Kenneth N. K. Fong, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
The goal of this clinical trial is to identify the effect of different time intervals between continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation(iTBS), on top of a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) for sensorimotor rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. Using electroencephalography (EEG) to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity underying stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Delivering Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) primed with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the primary motor cortex (M1) may enhance the facilitatory effect of iTBS on the stimulated M1 through metaplasticity. Previous studies have verified the effectiveness of priming iTBS on improving motor rehabilitation in patients with stroke. However, the optimal time interval between cTBS and iTBS remains unknown. The aim of this clinical trial is to identify the effect of different time intervals between cTBS and iTBS, followed with a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) for sensorimotor rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. Using electroencephalography (EEG) to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity. A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be performed with an estimated total of 30 patients with chronic stroke. All participants will be randomly allocated to receive 10-session intervention of different TBS protocols (i.e., cTBS-3min interval-iTBS, cTBS-10min interval-iTBS and cTBS-20min interval-iTBS), delivered for 2-4 sessions per week, lasting for 3-4 weeks. All participants will receive a 20-minute standard RAT after each stimulation session. Primary outcome will be Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE). Secondary outcomes will be Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), kinematic outcomes generated during RAT as well as EEG.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    • HK
      • Hong Kong, HK, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosis of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  2. the first-ever stroke with unilateral hemiplegia.
  3. 18-75 years old.
  4. chronic stroke ( ≥ 6 months).
  5. residual hemiparetic upper limb functional level in the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE-HK) ≥ 2.
  6. can understand and read Chinese.
  7. signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosis of any clinically significant or unstable medical disorder.
  2. any contraindications to TMS based on the TMS safety guidelines (Rossi, Hallett, Rossini, & Pascual-Leone, 2011).
  3. inability to follow treatment instructions due to severe cognitive (using the Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-HK) < 22/30) and communication deficiency.
  4. extreme spasticity over the hemiparetic upper limb (Modified Ashworth Score>2) or severe pain that hindered movement.
  5. a history of neurological or psychiatric disease excluding stroke, or current use of psychoactive medication (sedatives, antipsychotics, antidepressants, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: cTBS primed iTBS with 3-minute interval
short interval(3min) between cTBS and iTBS
Device: continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS)
Standard 600-pulse continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can inhibit the corticomotor excitability. The cTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Other Names:
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase the corticomotor excitability. The iTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Device: Robot-assisted training
Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device.
Experimental: cTBS primed iTBS with 10-minute interval
experimental interval(10min) between cTBS and iTBS
Device: continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS)
Standard 600-pulse continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can inhibit the corticomotor excitability. The cTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Other Names:
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase the corticomotor excitability. The iTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Device: Robot-assisted training
Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device.
Experimental: cTBS primed iTBS with 20-minute interval
long interval(20min) between cTBS and iTBS
Device: continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS)
Standard 600-pulse continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can inhibit the corticomotor excitability. The cTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Other Names:
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase the corticomotor excitability. The iTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Device: Robot-assisted training
Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device.
Sham Comparator: Non-primed iTBS
iTBS alone
Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase the corticomotor excitability. The iTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.
Device: Robot-assisted training
Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment) , 1 month after completion of treatment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE) scale is an index to assess the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had stroke. It contains motor assessment and sensory assessment. The motor parts includes 33 items assessing the movement, coordination and reflex actions of the shoulder, elbow, forearm and wrist, as well as the hand joints of the paretic arm. Each item consists of a three-point scale (0, 1 and 2), with a total maximum score of 66. The sensory component consists of 6 items assessing light touch and position of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and thumb. Each item consists of a three-point scale (0, 1, and 2) with a total score of 12 points.
Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment) , 1 month after completion of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment) , 1 month after completion of treatment
The ARAT is a clinical assessment for upper limb functional activities for patients with stroke, which mainly focuses on the proximal and distal upper limb function. It consists of four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement. It has 19 movement tasks, each graded using a four-point scale (total scores range from 0 to 57) (McDonnell, 2008). The MCID of ARAT is 5.70 points (Van der Lee et al., 2001).
Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment) , 1 month after completion of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensorimotor event-related desynchronization
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 1 (immediately after first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment)
Electroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by movement and mirror visual feedback-based observation of movement
Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 1 (immediately after first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment)
Sensory evoked potential
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 1 (immediately after first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment)
Electroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by periphral magenetic stimulation over the bilateral forearm.
Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 1 (immediately after first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HSEARS20240229006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

To protect the privacy of patients

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings