A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment For Facial Rejuvenation

October 4, 2024 updated by: Revision Skincare

A Clinical Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerance of a Topical Facial Treatment on Women With Mild to Moderate Fine Lines, Wrinkles, and Laxity on the Global Face

This single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks in healthy women aged 35 to 60 with mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity. Thirty-two (32) healthy female subjects completed the clinical study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks in healthy women aged 35 to 60 with mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity.

The efficacy and tolerability of the topical facial treatment in improving mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity. was evaluated by Investigator clinical efficacy grading and tolerability grading by a board-certified dermatologist, subject tolerability grading, and clinical photography.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 75081
        • SGS Stephens, inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - VI
  • Having mid to moderate global face fine lines, wrinkles, and laxtiy (tactile) (score of 3 to 6 according to a modified Griffiths scale).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Currently having or having a history of cold sores (Herpes simplex) on the face.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Topical Treatment
Subjects received a topical facial treatment applied by a license esthetician in a series of 3 sessions at 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks.
Other: Gentle Cleanser
The cleanser was instructed to be used twice daily over the course of 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Gentle Foaming Cleanser, Revision Skincare
Other: Facial Moisturizer
The Moisturizer was instructed to be applied to the global face twice daily over the course of 12 weeks.
Other: sunscreen SPF 30
The Sunscreen was instructed to be applied once daily in the morning, with re-application with extended sun exposure per FDA guidelines over the course of 12 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Sunscreen SPF 30

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Investigator Clinical Efficacy Grading versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary efficacy endpoint will be Investigator Clinical Efficacy grading of parameters at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. the efficacy parameters will be assessed by the expert grader on each subjects global face using a modified Griffiths 10-point scale. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
12 weeks
Lack of significant change in Investigator Tolerability Parameters versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by the expert grader by assessing the signs of erythema and dryness using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
12 weeks
Lack of significant change in Subjective Tolerability versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary tolerability endpoint will be Subjective Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by subject reporting of the degree of burning, stinging, and itching globally on each subject's global face using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Facial Parameters in a Self-Assessment Questionnaire versus Baseline and Percent Agreement
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The secondary endpoint will be subject self-assessment questionnaire completed at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Subjects are asked to rate statements based on a scoring system ranging from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). A change in response values at post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline response values indicates an improvement. The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.
12 weeks
Clinical Photography: VISIA-CR and Antera 3D
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The secondary endpoint will be image analysis of VISIA-CR and Antera 3D clinical photography. VISIA-CR imaging analysis for nasolabial folds, and Antera imaging analysis of roughness and volume on images taken at all timepoints. a reduction in visual fine lines, wrinkles, radiance, and laxity on post-baseline timepoints compared to baseline is indicated an improvement
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Revision Skincare

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
SGS Stephens, Inc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C22-D008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laxity; Skin

Clinical Trials on Gentle Cleanser

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings