A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment For Facial Rejuvenation

October 4, 2024 updated by: Revision Skincare

A Clinical Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerance of a Topical Facial Treatment on Women With Mild to Moderate Fine Lines, Wrinkles, and Laxity on the Global Face

This single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks in healthy women aged 35 to 60 with mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity. Thirty-two (32) healthy female subjects completed the clinical study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks in healthy women aged 35 to 60 with mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity.

The efficacy and tolerability of the topical facial treatment in improving mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity. was evaluated by Investigator clinical efficacy grading and tolerability grading by a board-certified dermatologist, subject tolerability grading, and clinical photography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 75081
        • SGS Stephens, inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - VI
  • Having mid to moderate global face fine lines, wrinkles, and laxtiy (tactile) (score of 3 to 6 according to a modified Griffiths scale).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Currently having or having a history of cold sores (Herpes simplex) on the face.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Topical Treatment
Subjects received a topical facial treatment applied by a license esthetician in a series of 3 sessions at 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks.
The cleanser was instructed to be used twice daily over the course of 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Gentle Foaming Cleanser, Revision Skincare
The Moisturizer was instructed to be applied to the global face twice daily over the course of 12 weeks.
The Sunscreen was instructed to be applied once daily in the morning, with re-application with extended sun exposure per FDA guidelines over the course of 12 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Sunscreen SPF 30

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Investigator Clinical Efficacy Grading versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary efficacy endpoint will be Investigator Clinical Efficacy grading of parameters at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. the efficacy parameters will be assessed by the expert grader on each subjects global face using a modified Griffiths 10-point scale. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
12 weeks
Lack of significant change in Investigator Tolerability Parameters versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by the expert grader by assessing the signs of erythema and dryness using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
12 weeks
Lack of significant change in Subjective Tolerability versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary tolerability endpoint will be Subjective Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by subject reporting of the degree of burning, stinging, and itching globally on each subject's global face using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Facial Parameters in a Self-Assessment Questionnaire versus Baseline and Percent Agreement
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The secondary endpoint will be subject self-assessment questionnaire completed at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Subjects are asked to rate statements based on a scoring system ranging from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). A change in response values at post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline response values indicates an improvement. The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.
12 weeks
Clinical Photography: VISIA-CR and Antera 3D
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The secondary endpoint will be image analysis of VISIA-CR and Antera 3D clinical photography. VISIA-CR imaging analysis for nasolabial folds, and Antera imaging analysis of roughness and volume on images taken at all timepoints. a reduction in visual fine lines, wrinkles, radiance, and laxity on post-baseline timepoints compared to baseline is indicated an improvement
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laxity; Skin

Clinical Trials on Gentle Cleanser

Subscribe