Intermittent Fasting and Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Fatty Liver Disease

June 24, 2025 updated by: Tugce Ozlu Karahan, Istanbul Bilgi University

Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Previous studies have investigated the effect of different dietary patterns on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), for which lifestyle modification remains the primary treatment. The present study sought to determine the effect of intermittent fasting on anthropometric measurements, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21, and autophagy markers including autophagy-related protein (ATG)-5 and BECLIN-1 levels, as well as on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis levels in overweight or obese patients with MAFLD to elucidate the efficacy of intermittent fasting in the management of MAFLD. The study included 48 patients diagnosed with MAFLD. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: 22 received a dietary treatment involving 22-25 kcal/kg/day of energy for 8 weeks (energy-restricted diet group), and 26 followed the same dietary intervention and a 16:8 pattern (energy + time-restricted diet group). The patients were assessed for various parameters at baseline (T0) and at the end of the week 8 (T8). The extent of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was determined using transient elastography on a FibroScan® device. Serum levels of FGF-21, BECLIN-1, and ATG-5 were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
55

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34854
        • Institute of Gastroenterology, Liver Research Unit, Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with MAFLD
  • Aged 18-65 years
  • BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²
  • A stable body weight (<5 kg weight loss or gain) over the last 3 months preceding the start of the study
  • Signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An average daily alcohol consumption >20 g for females and >30 g for males
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients with ischemic heart disease or heart failure, chronic inflammatory diseases, chronic viral infections, cancer, moderate-to-severe kidney disease, uncontrolled hypertension, and eating disorders
  • Those with a history of bariatric surgery
  • Those on insulin due to increased risk of hypoglycemia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Energy-restricted diet
The energy-restricted diet group followed an 8-week long dietary treatment involving 22-25 kcal/kg/day based on ideal body weight.
Other: Energy-restricted dietary intervention
The diets were planned based on current guidelines, manuals, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in recent years on MAFLD [5-6, 27-28]. In this diet, carbohydrates constituted 50%-55% of total energy intake, proteins constituted 10%-20%, and fats constituted 25%-35%. The content of the diets was tailored to each patient, considering various factors such as sex, age, and physical activity status.
Experimental: Energy + time-restricted diet
Patients in the energy + time-restricted diet group followed the same dietary intervention and a 16:8 eating pattern where they were instructed to restrict their energy intake to an 8-h time window and not to consume energy-containing foods or drinks during the remaining 16 h.
Other: Energy + time-restricted dietary intervention
Patients in the energy + time-restricted diet group followed the same dietary intervention and a 16:8 eating pattern where they were instructed to restrict their energy intake to an 8-h time window and not to consume energy-containing foods or drinks during the remaining 16 h. Participants were allowed to consume energy-free beverages such as water, coffee, and tea during fasting. The timing of the eating window during the day varied according to participants' lifestyles and habits. However, considering the importance of nocturnal fasting, the eating window in all patients started at 10:00-12:00 in the day and ended at 18:00-20:00 in the evening. The energy-restricted diet group did not follow any time restriction in the planning of main meals and snacks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transient Elastography-Controlled Attenuation Parameter
Time Frame: Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.
The extent of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was determined using transient elastography on a FibroScan® device. All FibroScan measurements were performed following the manufacturer's instructions as specified previously. Hepatic steatosis was defined using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). The CAP measurement, which indicates steatosis, ranged between 100 and 400 dB/m.
Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Transient Elastography-Liver Stiffness Measurement
Time Frame: Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.
The extent of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was determined using transient elastography on a FibroScan® device. All FibroScan measurements were performed following the manufacturer's instructions as specified previously. The extent of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was determined using transient elastography on a FibroScan® device. All FibroScan measurements were performed following the manufacturer's instructions as specified previously. Hepatic fibrosis were defined using liver stiffness measurement (LSM). LSM measurement ranged between 2.5 and 75 kPa.
Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor-21
Time Frame: Measurements were taken baseline before and 8 weeks after the intervention.
At each time point (baseline and week 8), one serum sample was collected per participant. Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21) levels were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, following the manufacturer's protocols (Human FGF-21 ELISA, Biovendor, Czech Republic).
Measurements were taken baseline before and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Serum Autophagy-Related Protein-5
Time Frame: Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.
At each time point (baseline and week 8), one serum sample was collected per participant. Serum autophagy-related protein-5 (ATG-5) were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, following the manufacturer's protocols (Human Autophagy protein 5 [ATG5] ELISA Kit, MyBioSource, Inc. USA).
Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Serum Beclin-1
Time Frame: Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.
At each time point (baseline and week 8), one serum sample was collected per participant. Serum Beclin-1 were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, following the manufacturer's protocols (Human BECN1 [Beclin 1] ELISA Kit, ElabScience, USA).
Measurements were taken twice baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istanbul Bilgi University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Marmara University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MAFLDIF
  • 24172 (Health Institutes of Türkiye (TUSEB))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings