Effects of Home-Based Exercise Program in Children After Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06560
- Gazi University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being between the ages of 6-18,
- Having clinical diagnose of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia,
- Being completed medical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a history of neurological, developmental, or genetic disorders,
- Communicating problems
- Medical conditions such as advanced cardiac damage, decreased bone quality, acute infection, and cancer recurrence.
Children who could not accomplish the exercises and evaluations, who did not want to continue the study, who could not be contacted for more than 2 weeks, and who disrupted the exercise program for more than 2 weeks were excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exercise
The exercise group performed a home-based exercise program consisting of aerobics 3 days a week and strengthening and stretching exercises 2 days a week, with videos and infographics, for 8 weeks.
|
The exercise group performed a home-based exercise program consisting of aerobics 3 days a week with videos and strengthening and stretching exercises 2 days a week with infographics, for 8 weeks.
|
|
Other: Control
control group was advised to increase physical activity.
|
The control group was advised to increase physical activity
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between baseline and final active ankle dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Active ankle dorsiflexion ROM was evaluated with a Baseline® (Aurora, IL, USA) brand goniometer in a supine position, with the knee supported by a pillow and the knee flexed and recorded in degrees
|
8 weeks
|
|
Difference between baseline and final muscle strength
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Knee extensor and ankle dorsiflexor muscle strength were assessed using a digital handheld dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, Indiana).
The "break" technique was used to measure muscle strength.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Difference between baseline and final handgrip strength
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Handgrip strength was evaluated using a hand dynamometer (J-Tech Commander Grip Track Dynamometer, JTECH Medical, Midvale, UT, US).The patient was positioned in a sitting position with the shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, the elbow at 90° flexion, and the forearm and wrist in neutral.
The patient was asked to squeeze the device as hard as he could for 5 seconds, and during the measurement, the child was given verbal encouragement such as "squeeze as hard as you can." Measurements were repeated 3 times and the average value was recorded in Newtons.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Difference between baseline and final aerobic endurance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Aerobic endurance was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
6MWT was performed by the American Thoracic Society guidelines.
During the test, the patient was asked to walk in the corridor as fast as he could without running, jumping, or jumping within the determined limits for 6 minutes.
Total walking distance was recorded in meters
|
8 weeks
|
|
Difference between baseline and final functional mobility
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Functional mobility was assessed with the Timed Up and Go Test.
While the patient was in a sitting position on an armless chair, he was asked to get up on command, walk 3 meters, return, and sit on the chair again.
The elapsed time was recorded in seconds.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Difference between baseline and final serum inflammatory markers and brain derived neurotrophic factor levels
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Serum samples required to examine levels of inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-a, and IL-1b) and BDNF were obtained during blood collection at the patients' routine hospital visits.Data about serum IL-6 and TNF-a were recorded from the hospital information system.
Serum IL-1b and BDNF levels were analyzed using ELISA kits provided by the researchers.
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 419 Haspolat M
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.