Effects of Home-Based Exercise Program in Children After Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

October 28, 2024 updated by: Ilke Keser, Gazi University
This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to investigate the effects of a home-based exercise program on physical functions, inflammatory markers, and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in children followed after Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) treatments. Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), dorsiflexion and knee extensor muscle strength, hand grip strength, aerobic endurance, and functional mobility were assessed using a goniometer, digital dynamometer; hand dynamometer, 6 Minute Walk Test (6 MWT), Timed Up and Go Test respectively. Interleukin-1 Beta, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and BDNF values were examined using ELISA kits. 20 patients will be included in the study. The patients randomly divided into 2 groups: exercise (n:10) and control (n:10). The exercise group performed a home-based exercise program consisting of aerobics 3 days a week and strengthening and stretching exercises 2 days a week, with videos and infographics, for 8 weeks. The control group was advised to increase physical activity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06560
        • Gazi University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between the ages of 6-18,
  • Having clinical diagnose of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia,
  • Being completed medical treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a history of neurological, developmental, or genetic disorders,
  • Communicating problems
  • Medical conditions such as advanced cardiac damage, decreased bone quality, acute infection, and cancer recurrence.

Children who could not accomplish the exercises and evaluations, who did not want to continue the study, who could not be contacted for more than 2 weeks, and who disrupted the exercise program for more than 2 weeks were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise
The exercise group performed a home-based exercise program consisting of aerobics 3 days a week and strengthening and stretching exercises 2 days a week, with videos and infographics, for 8 weeks.
The exercise group performed a home-based exercise program consisting of aerobics 3 days a week with videos and strengthening and stretching exercises 2 days a week with infographics, for 8 weeks.
Other: Control
control group was advised to increase physical activity.
The control group was advised to increase physical activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between baseline and final active ankle dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Active ankle dorsiflexion ROM was evaluated with a Baseline® (Aurora, IL, USA) brand goniometer in a supine position, with the knee supported by a pillow and the knee flexed and recorded in degrees
8 weeks
Difference between baseline and final muscle strength
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Knee extensor and ankle dorsiflexor muscle strength were assessed using a digital handheld dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, Indiana). The "break" technique was used to measure muscle strength.
8 weeks
Difference between baseline and final handgrip strength
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Handgrip strength was evaluated using a hand dynamometer (J-Tech Commander Grip Track Dynamometer, JTECH Medical, Midvale, UT, US).The patient was positioned in a sitting position with the shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, the elbow at 90° flexion, and the forearm and wrist in neutral. The patient was asked to squeeze the device as hard as he could for 5 seconds, and during the measurement, the child was given verbal encouragement such as "squeeze as hard as you can." Measurements were repeated 3 times and the average value was recorded in Newtons.
8 weeks
Difference between baseline and final aerobic endurance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Aerobic endurance was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). 6MWT was performed by the American Thoracic Society guidelines. During the test, the patient was asked to walk in the corridor as fast as he could without running, jumping, or jumping within the determined limits for 6 minutes. Total walking distance was recorded in meters
8 weeks
Difference between baseline and final functional mobility
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Functional mobility was assessed with the Timed Up and Go Test. While the patient was in a sitting position on an armless chair, he was asked to get up on command, walk 3 meters, return, and sit on the chair again. The elapsed time was recorded in seconds.
8 weeks
Difference between baseline and final serum inflammatory markers and brain derived neurotrophic factor levels
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Serum samples required to examine levels of inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-a, and IL-1b) and BDNF were obtained during blood collection at the patients' routine hospital visits.Data about serum IL-6 and TNF-a were recorded from the hospital information system. Serum IL-1b and BDNF levels were analyzed using ELISA kits provided by the researchers.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe