Options for Navigating Talking About Risk and Adolescent Choices (ON-TRAC)
Emotion Regulation Intervention to Prevent Substance Use Among Youth in the Child Welfare System
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Stephanie Parade, PhD
- Phone Number: 401-793-8247
- Email: stephanie_parade@brown.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Christopher Houck, PhD
- Phone Number: 401-793-8333
- Email: CHouck@brownhealth.org
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Contact with the Rhode Island child welfare system
- Caregiver who is a parent/guardian of a child who experienced maltreatment
- Caregiver who speaks English or Spanish
- Caregiver who does not have developmental delays
- Adolescent who is between 12-15 years of age
- Adolescent who is fluent in English
- Adolescent who has active follow-up with the Rhode Island child welfare system due to an indicated finding of abuse or neglect in the past year
Exclusion Criteria:
- Adolescent who cannot read at a 4th grade level
- Adolescent who has a sibling who has participated in the program
- Adolescent who has developmental delays
- Adolescent who lacks parental consent for the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ON-TRAC Intervention
Web-based emotion regulation and substance use intervention
|
Online tablet-based intervention that teaches youth emotion regulation skills and integrates substance use prevention content
|
|
No Intervention: Waitlist Control
Control participants are assessed on the same schedule as the treatment condition and offered the intervention after the 8-month follow-up
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timeline Follow Back
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
A calendar assisted daily substance use estimation method obtained by interview.
Days used will serve as primary outcome.
More days used represent more substance use.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire - Shortened Adolescent Version
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses self-efficacy to resist alcohol use.
Scores range from 9 to 54.
Higher scores represent greater drinking refusal self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire - Shortened Adolescent Version (Adapted for Marijuana Use)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses self-efficacy to resist marijuana use.
Scores range from 9 to 54.
Higher scores represent greater marijuana refusal self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Single items assess other risk behaviors such as sexual risk or violence behaviors.
Endorsement of each individual item indicates engagement in the risk behavior.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Information System - Anger Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses symptoms of mental health and social functioning.
Scores range from 5 to 25.
Higher scores indicate greater anger.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses perceptions of emotion regulation skills.
Scores range from 18-90.
Higher scores indicate more difficulty regulating emotions.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Emotion Regulation Behaviors Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses use of emotion regulation behaviors taught in the intervention.
Scores range from 9 to 36.
Higher scores indicate more frequent use of the strategies taught.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, and 8-months
|
Computer-based measure that asks participants to identify the emotion of facial expressions displayed in photographs.
Scores range from 0 to 20.
Higher scores indicate better identification of emotions.
|
Baseline, 2-, and 8-months
|
|
Behavioral Indicator of Resiliency to Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, and 8-months
|
Computerized frustration task in which participants are given the option to quit at any time.
Scores range from 0 to 300 seconds.
Higher scores indicate more persistence in a frustrating task.
|
Baseline, 2-, and 8-months
|
|
Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses perception of ability to cope with negative emotions.
Scores range from 8 to 40.
Higher scores indicate greater perceived ability to cope with negative emotions.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Implicit Theories of Emotions for Children - Self subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
Assesses beliefs about the controllability of emotions.
Scores range from 6 to 36.
Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs about the controllability of emotions.
|
Baseline, 2-, 5-, and 8-months
|
|
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia
Time Frame: Baseline and 2-month follow up
|
Collected in response to virtual reality scenes, RSA is a physiological marker of emotion regulation processes calculated from heart rate variability as an index of parasympathetic activity.
|
Baseline and 2-month follow up
|
|
Feasibility and Acceptability Scale
Time Frame: 2-month follow-up (ON-TRAC group only)
|
Assesses acceptability of digital interventions to assess implementation outcomes.
Scores range from 5 to 25.
Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.
|
2-month follow-up (ON-TRAC group only)
|
|
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: 2-month follow-up (ON-TRAC group only)
|
Assesses usability of technology programs to assess implementation outcomes.
Scores range from 10 to 50.
Higher scores indicate greater usability of the intervention.
|
2-month follow-up (ON-TRAC group only)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ON-TRAC (unknown Protocol ID)
- R61DA059785 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.