Visual Performance With Clareon® Vivity® Intraocular Lenses (IOLs)
Evaluation of the Impact of Residual Astigmatism on the Visual Performance With Clareon Vivity
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Alcon Call Center
- Phone Number: 1-888-451-3937
- Email: alcon.medinfo@alcon.com
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States, 48302
- Grosinger, Spigelman & Grey Eye Surgeons, P.C
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75243
- Key-Whitman Eye Center
-
Sugar Land, Texas, United States, 77478
- Berkeley Eye Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to understand and sign an Institution Review Board-approved informed consent form;
- Willing and able to attend all scheduled study visits as required by the protocol;
- Implanted with study IOLs in both eyes at least 4 months prior to study participation;
- Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0 logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better in each eye.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Residual astigmatism greater than or equal to 1.00 diopter (D);
- Clinically significant ocular conditions as specified in the protocol;
- History of ocular surgeries other than limbal relaxing incisions
- Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric
Previous implantation in both eyes with Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOLs, with previous implantation defined as at least 4 months prior to study participation.
|
Extended vision intraocular lens implanted in the capsular bag of the eye during cataract surgery.
IOLs are intended for long term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Difference in Monocular Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) (4 Meters) Before and After Inducing 1.0 Diopter (D) Astigmatism - WTR
Time Frame: Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
BCDVA was assessed with best refractive correction in place at a distance of 4 meters (m) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter charts.
Trial lenses were used to induce 1.0 diopter (D) of astigmatism with-the-rule (WTR), defined as -0.50/+1.00
D at approximately 180 degrees on the optical axis.
VA was measured in the first implanted eye in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity.
The change in VA before and after inducing astigmatism is reported, with a positive value representing a decline in VA.
No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this co-primary endpoint.
|
Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
|
Mean Difference in Monocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) (66 Centimeters) Before and After Inducing 1.0 D Astigmatism - WTR
Time Frame: Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
DCIVA was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) at a distance of 66 centimeters (cm) from the spectacle plane using ETDRS letter charts.
Trial lenses were used to induce 1.0 D of astigmatism with-the-rule (WTR), defined as -0.50/+1.00
D at approximately 180 degrees on the optical axis.
VA was measured in the first implanted eye in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity.
The change in VA before and after inducing astigmatism is reported, with a positive value representing a decline in VA.
No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this co-primary endpoint.
|
Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
|
Mean Difference in Monocular Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (40 cm) Before and After Inducing 1.0 D Astigmatism - WTR
Time Frame: Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
DCNVA was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) at a distance of 40 cm from the spectacle plane using ETDRS letter charts.
Trial lenses were used to induce 1.0 D of astigmatism WTR, defined as -0.50/+1.00
D at approximately 180 degrees on the optical axis.VA was measured in the first implanted eye in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity.
The change in VA before and after inducing astigmatism is reported, with a positive value representing a decline in VA.
No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this co-primary endpoint.
|
Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
|
Mean Difference in Monocular Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) (4 Meters) Before and After Inducing 1.0 Diopter (D) Astigmatism - ATR
Time Frame: Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
BCDVA was assessed with best refractive correction in place at a distance of 4 m using ETDRS letter charts.
Trial lenses were used to induce 1.0 D of astigmatism against the rule (ATR), defined as -0.50/+1.00
D at approximately 90 degrees on the optical axis.
VA was measured in the first implanted eye in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity.
The change in VA before and after inducing astigmatism is reported, with a positive value representing a decline in VA.
No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this co-primary endpoint.
|
Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
|
Mean Difference in Monocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) (66 Centimeters) Before and After Inducing 1.0 D Astigmatism.- ATR
Time Frame: Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
DCIVA was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) at a distance of 66 cm from the spectacle plane using ETDRS letter charts.
Trial lenses were used to induce 1.0 D of astigmatism ATR, defined as -0.50/+1.00
D at approximately 90 degrees on the optical axis.
VA was measured in the first implanted eye in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity.
The change in VA before and after inducing astigmatism is reported, with a positive value representing a decline in VA.
No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this co-primary endpoint.
|
Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
|
Mean Difference in Monocular Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (40 cm) Before and After Inducing 1.0 D Astigmatism - ATR
Time Frame: Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
DCNVA was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) at a distance of 40 cm from the spectacle plane using ETDRS letter charts.
Trial lenses were used to induce 1.0 D of astigmatism ATR, defined as -0.50/+1.00
D at approximately 90 degrees on the optical axis.
VA was measured in the first implanted eye in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity.
The change in VA before and after inducing astigmatism is reported, with a positive value representing a decline in VA.
No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this co-primary endpoint.
|
Day 0 before induced astigmatism; Day 0 after induced astigmatism
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Trial Lead, Surgical CRD, Alcon Research, LLC
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ILE632-C003
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.