The Safety and Efficacy of Combined Microwave Ablation During Limb-sparing Surgery in High-risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients

January 25, 2025 updated by: Yu Zhang, PhD, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a high risk of recurrence when invading surrounding structures, and the optimal treatment strategy for safe surgical margin is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined local inactivation by ablation in STS during limb-sparing surgery in high-risk STS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a high risk of recurrence when invading surrounding structures, and the optimal treatment strategy for safe surgical margin is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined local inactivation by ablation in STS during limb-sparing surgery in high-risk STS patients. Investigators collected data retrospectively from participants diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma who were treated at a tertiary medical institution from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. This study was approved by the hospital's Ethics Committee (XJS2022-101-01), and all participants provided written informed consent. The participants were divided into two groups (MWA and control group). The MWA group received surgical resection combined with local lesion inactivation by MWA, while the control group underwent standard surgical resection alone. Non-specified sarcomas are treated with the AI(Doxorubicin+Ifosfamide) chemotherapy regimen, while Ewing's sarcoma is treated with the standard recommended VDC ((Vincristine + Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide)/IE(Ifosfamide + Etoposide) chemotherapy regimen.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 516008
        • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma (FNCLCC grade G2-G3);
  2. MRI/CT confirmed tumor invasion beyond anatomical compartments, joint involvement, or encroachment on surrounding tissues (bones, muscle, etc.);
  3. After being fully informed of the risks, the patient strongly refuses amputation or wide resection, which leads to irreversible impaired function.
  4. Good physical condition, able to tolerate surgery;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis;
  2. Patients with missing clinical or follow-up data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MWA group
The MWA group received surgical resection combined with local lesion inactivation by MWA
Procedure: Microwave Ablation
The MWA group followed a similar resection procedure as the control group. The area of ablation was evaluated strictly by radiologists and surgeons according to the following criteria: 1) Areas of tumor response, progression, or suspicious invasion (intermediate-high signal and edema range in T2) were assessed. Wide margins of at least 2-3 cm or more were obtained over the normal tissue around the tumor. Ablation margins were covered using a microwave ablation array with antennas (Microwave Ablation System BD-GT, Baird Medical LLC), aimed at completely inactivating the tumor in situ. Ablation needles were strategically arranged to form a matrix covering the target zone. The ablation time and power were determined based on the extent of the lesion, ensuring the temperature of the ablation area remained between 70-80°C. A 50 ml syringe was used to continuously drip and spray ice-cold saline to keep surrounding tissue temperatures below 40-43°C.
No Intervention: Control group
The control group received standard surgical resection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of diagnosis until the date of documented death, assessed up to 5 years (up to 5 year)
Overall survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to last follow-up or death.
From date of diagnosis until the date of documented death, assessed up to 5 years (up to 5 year)
progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From date of surgery until the date of first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to 5 years
progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from surgery to disease progression or death
From date of surgery until the date of first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to 5 years
Local disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: From date of surgery until the date of first documented local tumor recurrence, assessed up to 5 years
Local disease-free survival (DFS) was the time for local tumor recurrence after surgery.
From date of surgery until the date of first documented local tumor recurrence, assessed up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Post-operation 3 months
Serious postoperative complications were recorded according to CTCAE 4.0, including severe wound healing problems, deep infections, bone necrosis, wound burn, persistent pain, and major neurovascular injuries.
Post-operation 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MWASTS001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to ethical and patient privacy restrictions, relevant data is not publicly disclosed

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings