Natural History of MTBI-related Convergence Insufficiency & Effectiveness of Vision Therapy for MTBI-related CI (TBEye)

February 21, 2025 updated by: Salus University

PILOT CLINICAL TRIAL (PCT) of the Natural History of the Most Common MTBI-related Oculomotor Disorder Convergence Insufficiency & the Effectiveness of Vergence/Accommodative Therapy for MTBI-related Convergence Insufficiency

The design of this project is a pilot study, a type of feasibility study conducted in preparation for subsequent RCTs that will assess the effectiveness of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with movement (OBVAM) for mTBI-related convergence insufficiency.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The design of this project is a pilot study, a type of feasibility study conducted in preparation for subsequent RCTs that will assess the effectiveness of interventions or therapies. In this application, we refer to this pilot and feasibility study as a pilot clinical trial (PCT). This feasibility PCT aims to identify potential challenges, logistical issues, and unforeseen complications. To do this, we will examine various feasibility aspects, including recruitment and retention, randomization, intervention protocols, outcome measures, ethical considerations, safety monitoring, resource availability, and stakeholder feedback. By conducting this PCT, we can test our procedures and gather preliminary data. The primary objectives of this feasibility PCT are to 1) Determine the feasibility of conducting future full-scale RCTs by evaluating the effectiveness of a novel vergence/accommodative/move (OBVAM) therapy program for young adults with mTBI-CI and 2) Better understand the progression and stability (i.e., natural history) of mTBI-CI over the 6 weeks following enrollment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: MItchell Scheiman, OD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 215-780-1427
  • Email: ms5758@drexel.edu

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Age 18 to 35 years inclusive

    • Medical diagnosis of mTBI or concussion > 1 month ago and no longer than 6 months ago
    • Convergence Insufficiency Symptom (CISS score) ≥ 21
    • Best-corrected VA of 20/25 or better in both eyes at distance & near
    • Willingness to wear refractive correction, if indicated
    • Random dot stereopsis of 500 arcsec or better (Randot Stereo Test)
    • Receded NPC of ≥6 cm
    • Insufficient PFV (< 15∆ or PFV blur point less than twice the near exophoria magnitude)
    • Wearing refractive correction for cycloplegic refractive errors of:
    • ≥ +1.25 D SE hyperopia or ≥ -1.00 D SE myopia in either eye
    • ≥ 1.25 D astigmatism in either eye, ≥ 1.00 D SE anisometropia
    • Astigmatism axis within ±10 degrees if magnitude is ≤1.00 D and within ±5 degrees if >1.00 D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • No previous treatment for CI

    • No previous diagnosis of CI from an ophthalmologist or optometrist
    • No medications known to affect accommodation or vergence
    • Investigator & patient willing to forgo all other CI treatment other than that assigned by randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Immediate Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy with Movement (OBVAM)
16 sessions, twice per week of office-based vergence/accommodation therapy (OBVASM)While OBVAM therapy retains the essential elements of OBVAT. The OBVAM therapy protocol has four phases. Phase 1 targets visual/vestibular issues typical in mTBI-CI by integrating version eye movements, such as saccades and pursuits, with head and body movements. It also includes gross convergence, monocular accommodative (focusing) flexibility, and simple convergence procedures. The subsequent phases concentrate on enhancing ramp vergence amplitudes and improving accommodative facility (Phase 2), focusing on vergence facility and endurance (Phase 3), and integrating vergence and accommodation (Phase 4). Head and body movements are incorporated into some therapy procedures in Phases 3 and 4.
Other: Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy with Movement (OBVAM)
Head and body movements are incorporated into some therapy procedures in Phases 3 and 4. Additional details are provided in the Overall Program Narrative. Participants undergoing office-based VAM therapy will be prescribed home therapy procedures including the HTS2 Home Vision Therapy System (https://htsvision.com/) thrice weekly to support their in-office VAM therapy. This software progressively increases fusional convergence and divergence demands, offers instant user feedback, and will allow us to track participants' usage and progress. Basic procedures like free-space fusion cards and Brock String will also be prescribed for home therapy.
Active Comparator: Delayed Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy with Movement (OBVAM)
Same as immediate group but delayed 6 weeks
Other: Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy with Movement (OBVAM)
Head and body movements are incorporated into some therapy procedures in Phases 3 and 4. Additional details are provided in the Overall Program Narrative. Participants undergoing office-based VAM therapy will be prescribed home therapy procedures including the HTS2 Home Vision Therapy System (https://htsvision.com/) thrice weekly to support their in-office VAM therapy. This software progressively increases fusional convergence and divergence demands, offers instant user feedback, and will allow us to track participants' usage and progress. Basic procedures like free-space fusion cards and Brock String will also be prescribed for home therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Composite Measure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The primary outcome measure is a composite score of two key clinical measures: the near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence at near (PFV). At the two outcome visits, each participant's performance on these clinical measures will be categorized according to the following predefined success criteria: 1) Successful: meets both criteria; a) NPC is <6 cm and improved ≥4 cm and b) PFV meets Sheard's criterion and the blur (break, if no blur) is >15Δ and increased ≥10Δ; 2) Improved: NPC improved ≥4 cm and PFV improved ≥10Δ; and 3) Non-Responder: Does not meet criteria for successful or improved
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the Change in the Near Point of Convergence (NPC) break and recovery value
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A standard near point rod will be used to measure the ability to converge the eyes. We will measure the NPC break (when double vision occurs) and the NPC recovery (when single vision is restored) . A comparison of the change in the break and recovery between the immediate and the delayed groups will be analyzed from baseline to to the first outcome visit (after 6 weeks).
6 weeks
Comparison of the Change in Positive Fusional Vergence after 6 weeks between the Two Groups
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A hand-held prism bar will be used to assess positive fusional vergence (PFV) at baseline and after 6 weeks. We will measure the PFV break (when double vision occurs) and the PFV recovery (when single vision is restored) . A comparison of the change in the break and recovery between the immediate and the delayed groups will be analyzed from baseline to to the first outcome visit (after 6 weeks).
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Salus University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mitchell Scheiman, OD, PhD, Drexel University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VR230111 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings