The Objective of This Study is to Evaluate the Perfomance of a Photorefraction Device for Screening Ametropia in Children. Eligible Participants Will Undergo Multiple Refractive Error Measurements, Visual Acuity and Strabismus Assessments During a Single Evaluation Visit.

April 28, 2025 updated by: Essilor International

Evaluation of the Photorefraction Screener Snapsight in Comparison With Cycloplegia Table-top Autorefractor in Ametropia in Pediatric Population Between 3 and 8yo, Multicenter French Study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the performance of a photorefraction screener in terms of sensibility, sensitivity and accuracy on children aged 3 to 8 y.o. The main objectives of the study are:

  • Evaluate the performances of the device in comparison with the gold standard, i.e. a tabletop refractometer.
  • Assess the agreement of the measures obtained with the device with those obtained with the gold standard.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Participants after verification of their eligibility and informed consent, participate to a single evaluation visit during which several objective refraction measurements are performed with the investigational device, a tabletop refractometer and a comparable vision screener with and without cyclopegia. Additionally far vision visual acuity, strabismus assessments and subjective refraction measurement are also performed by investigators.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
315

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Dr Krafft private practice
        • Contact:
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 3-8 years when included in the study
  • All skin phototypes (I to VI according to the Fitzpatrick classification)
  • Wearing glasses or not
  • Capacity to give valid consent
  • Capacity to follow the protocol to obtain reliable measure
  • Under French medical insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under myopia control solution that may have an impact on refractive error (such as: atropine, orthokeratology,..)
  • Wearing contact lenses
  • Ocular or systemic pathology that may have an impact on vision or may interfere with the study measures (except strabismus)
  • Under medication that may have an impact on vision or may interfere with study measurements
  • Known contraindication to the active substance or to one of the excipients of eye drops (Mydriaticum 0.5%, Skiacol 0.5%)
  • Known risk of angle-closure glaucoma
  • Participation to another study that may have an impact on vision or may interfere with the study measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Snapsight photorefraction device
Device: Photorefraction device under investigation
Objective refraction measurement with and without cyclopegia
Device: Comparator device, Tabletop auto-refractometer
Objective refraction measurement with and without cyclopegia
Device: Comparator device, portable photorefraction device
Objective refraction measurement with and without cyclopegia
Other: Distance visual acuity assessments
Distance visual acuity is assessed with the refraction measures found by the device under investigation and the comparator device with and without cyclopegia.
Other: Subjective refraction and far visual acuity
Subjective refraction is assessed and far visual acuity is assessed with the found refraction measures
Other: Strabismus assessment
Strabismus is assessed with the refraction measures found by the device under investigation and the comparator device with and without cyclopegia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perfomance evaluation for ametropia screening
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The performance of the device in terms of sensitivity is evaluated by comparison with a tabletop refractometer.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement of refraction measurements obtained with the device under investigation and a tabletop refractometer
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The evaluated refraction measurements are the spherical equivalent and Jackson's cylindrical vectors.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Perfomance evaluation for ametropia screening
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The performance of the device in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are evaluated by comparison with a tabletop refractometer.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Perfomance evaluation for amblyopia screening
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The performance of the device in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are evaluated by comparison with a tabletop refractometer or the masking test and prism bars for strabismus.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Safety assessment and device failures
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Type, frequency and severity of adverse events and device failures are evaluated
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Essilor International

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aranaud Sauer, MD, PhD, FEBO, Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WS10386-EPSS
  • 2024-A00780-47 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings