Effects of Combined Training on Physical Performance in Young Soccer Players
Effects of Lower-body Strength Training Combined With Small-sided Games on Physical Performance in Young Soccer Players
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aydın, Turkey
- Aydın Adnan Menderes University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- have no injuries, illnesses, or physical limitations that would prevent participation in the study
- have been training and playing official soccer for a minimum of 2 years
- have participated in all testing protocols
- have participated in a minimum of 80% of the training sessions
- have not participated in any structured strength training program for the last six months, except for bodyweight exercises; and
- have not been a goalkeeper
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Combined Training
During the 6-week intervention period, the combined training group performed 2 sessions per week of lower-body strength training and 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training in different formats.
The combined training group also participated in their team's regular soccer training, which focused on technical and tactical skills, with 5 sessions per week (60-90 minutes each).
|
During the 6-week intervention period, the combined training group performed 2 sessions per week of lower-body strength training and 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training in different formats.
The strength training was performed on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
This training was finished at least one hour before the team's technical and tactical soccer training.
The strength training program is designed to include movements for bilateral hip dominant, bilateral knee dominant, unilateral hip dominant, unilateral knee dominant and calf muscles.
The exercises were selected to allow players to perform them on the field with minimal equipment, without the need for machines.
In addition, small field games training was practiced two days a week.
Repetitions in reserve and resistance training-specific ratings of the perceived exertion scale were used to determine training intensity and load.
|
|
Experimental: Small-sided games alone
The small-sided games group performed 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training program in different formats, without participating in any strength training.
The combined training group also participated in their team's regular soccer training, which focused on technical and tactical skills, with 5 sessions per week (60-90 minutes each).
|
The small-sided games group performed 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training program in different formats, without participating in any strength training.
The small-sided games training was conducted twice a week on Wednesdays and Fridays (8:00-10:00 p.m.) for 6 weeks.
These training sessions started before the team's technical and tactical training.
Extra balls are placed at the goals and along the field boundary lines, allowing play to restart immediately after the ball leaves the field.
During the games, the offside rule was not applied.
The game started with the foot when the ball left edge of the field.
Other rules in the games were kept similar to those of official soccer.
During the games, the coaches encouraged the players to exert maximum effort.
The number of defenders, midfielders, and attackers in the teams was kept as equal as possible.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Height
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
Height (in cm) was measured using a stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany).
These measurement was taken in the morning, before breakfast, while the players wore light clothing and no shoes.
Measurement was performed twice to reduce the margin of error.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
Body weights
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
Body weights (in kg) were measured using a body mass measuring device (Fakir, Germany).
These measurement was taken in the morning, before breakfast, while the players wore light clothing and no shoes.
Measurement was performed twice to reduce the margin of error.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
Body mass index
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
Body mass index (BMI) (kilograms/m2) was calculated from height and body weight values.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
20-m sprint
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
The sprinting performance was assessed using the 20-m linear sprint test.
The test was conducted using two pairs of photocells (Smartspeed, Fusion Sport Pty Queensland, Australia).
The starting point was placed 70 cm behind the first pair of photocells.
First, a familiarization trial was conducted at low intensity.
The test was then performed twice, with two-minute passive recovery intervals.
The best result was used for analysis.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
Agility
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
To assess agility performance, the Illinois Agility Test (IAT), a valid and reliable test for male team athletes, was used.
Prior to starting the test, the player lies in a prone position, with the chin touching the surface of the starting line.
After the researcher's command started, the player quickly stood up and ran in the indicated direction, avoiding contact with the placed cones.
First, a familiarization trial was conducted at low intensity.
Two trials were then performed, with two-minute passive recovery intervals.
The best time was used for analysis.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
Repeated sprint ability (RSA)
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
RSA was assessed using the 6x20-m RSA test.
A 20-second rest interval was provided between sprints.
A photocell system (Smartspeed, Fusion Sport Pty, Queensland, Australia) was placed at the start and at the 20-m line to measure sprint time.
The players started the test from the line marked 70 cm behind the first pair of photocells.
The mean sprint time (mean sprint time over the six sprints) (RSAmean) and the total sprint time (total time over the six sprints) (RSAtotal) were used for the analysis.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
Vertical jump
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
Vertical jump performance was evaluated using the countermovement jump (CMJ) test.
The test was performed using the My Jump Lab smartphone application (Spain, Madrid, version 1.2.2), which has proven validity and reliability for vertical jump measurement.
Players were instructed to begin the jump with their feet shoulder-width apart, in a 90° knee flexion position, with their hands on their hips.
During the test, players were instructed to jump as high as possible while keeping their hands on their hips.
The mobile phone was positioned 3 meters away from the player, and the camera height was set to 0.90 meters using a tripod.
The players first performed a familiarization trial at low intensity.
Each player then performed three jumps, with two-minute passive recovery intervals.
The highest jump was used for analysis
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
|
Aerobic fitness
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
Aerobic fitness was assessed using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIRTL-1).
The test was conducted following previously described instructions (Bangsbo et al., 2008).
The players' estimated maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) after the test was calculated using the formula ''VO2max = 36.4
+ (0.0084 x covered distance in YYIRTL-1)''.
|
After 6 weeks of training intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Querido SM, Clemente FM. Analyzing the effects of combined small-sided games and strength and power training on the fitness status of under-19 elite football players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Jan;60(1):1-10. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09818-9.
- Arslan E, Soylu Y, Clemente FM, Hazir T, Kin Isler A, Kilit B. Short-term effects of on-field combined core strength and small-sided games training on physical performance in young soccer players. Biol Sport. 2021 Oct;38(4):609-616. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.102865. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AdnanMU-FSS-MTI-577954-280325-
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.