Effects of Combined Training on Physical Performance in Young Soccer Players

April 3, 2025 updated by: Muhammet Taha İlhan, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Effects of Lower-body Strength Training Combined With Small-sided Games on Physical Performance in Young Soccer Players

Small-sided games (SSGs) are an effective training method for improving aerobic fitness. However, their effects on physical performance attributes such as, sprinting, jumping, agility, and repeated sprint ability (RSA) remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of lower-body strength training combined with SSGs training (CT) versus SSGs training alone on sprinting, agility, RSA, countermovement jump (CMJ), and aerobic fitness in young soccer players. Twenty young soccer players were randomly assigned to one of two groups: CT (n = 10; age: 14.0 ± 0.0) and SSGs (n = 10; age: 14.0 ± 0.0). The CT group performed lower-body strength training twice a week, in addition to SSGs training twice a week. The SSGs group performed SSGs training only twice a week, without any strength training. Before and after the 6-week training intervention, the 20-m sprint test, Illinois agility test (IAT), RSA, CMJ, and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 were conducted.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aydın, Turkey
        • Aydın Adnan Menderes University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have no injuries, illnesses, or physical limitations that would prevent participation in the study
  • have been training and playing official soccer for a minimum of 2 years
  • have participated in all testing protocols
  • have participated in a minimum of 80% of the training sessions
  • have not participated in any structured strength training program for the last six months, except for bodyweight exercises; and
  • have not been a goalkeeper

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined Training
During the 6-week intervention period, the combined training group performed 2 sessions per week of lower-body strength training and 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training in different formats. The combined training group also participated in their team's regular soccer training, which focused on technical and tactical skills, with 5 sessions per week (60-90 minutes each).
During the 6-week intervention period, the combined training group performed 2 sessions per week of lower-body strength training and 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training in different formats. The strength training was performed on Tuesdays and Thursdays. This training was finished at least one hour before the team's technical and tactical soccer training. The strength training program is designed to include movements for bilateral hip dominant, bilateral knee dominant, unilateral hip dominant, unilateral knee dominant and calf muscles. The exercises were selected to allow players to perform them on the field with minimal equipment, without the need for machines. In addition, small field games training was practiced two days a week. Repetitions in reserve and resistance training-specific ratings of the perceived exertion scale were used to determine training intensity and load.
Experimental: Small-sided games alone
The small-sided games group performed 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training program in different formats, without participating in any strength training. The combined training group also participated in their team's regular soccer training, which focused on technical and tactical skills, with 5 sessions per week (60-90 minutes each).
The small-sided games group performed 2 sessions per week of small-sided games training program in different formats, without participating in any strength training. The small-sided games training was conducted twice a week on Wednesdays and Fridays (8:00-10:00 p.m.) for 6 weeks. These training sessions started before the team's technical and tactical training. Extra balls are placed at the goals and along the field boundary lines, allowing play to restart immediately after the ball leaves the field. During the games, the offside rule was not applied. The game started with the foot when the ball left edge of the field. Other rules in the games were kept similar to those of official soccer. During the games, the coaches encouraged the players to exert maximum effort. The number of defenders, midfielders, and attackers in the teams was kept as equal as possible.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Height
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
Height (in cm) was measured using a stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany). These measurement was taken in the morning, before breakfast, while the players wore light clothing and no shoes. Measurement was performed twice to reduce the margin of error.
After 6 weeks of training intervention
Body weights
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
Body weights (in kg) were measured using a body mass measuring device (Fakir, Germany). These measurement was taken in the morning, before breakfast, while the players wore light clothing and no shoes. Measurement was performed twice to reduce the margin of error.
After 6 weeks of training intervention
Body mass index
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
Body mass index (BMI) (kilograms/m2) was calculated from height and body weight values.
After 6 weeks of training intervention
20-m sprint
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
The sprinting performance was assessed using the 20-m linear sprint test. The test was conducted using two pairs of photocells (Smartspeed, Fusion Sport Pty Queensland, Australia). The starting point was placed 70 cm behind the first pair of photocells. First, a familiarization trial was conducted at low intensity. The test was then performed twice, with two-minute passive recovery intervals. The best result was used for analysis.
After 6 weeks of training intervention
Agility
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
To assess agility performance, the Illinois Agility Test (IAT), a valid and reliable test for male team athletes, was used. Prior to starting the test, the player lies in a prone position, with the chin touching the surface of the starting line. After the researcher's command started, the player quickly stood up and ran in the indicated direction, avoiding contact with the placed cones. First, a familiarization trial was conducted at low intensity. Two trials were then performed, with two-minute passive recovery intervals. The best time was used for analysis.
After 6 weeks of training intervention
Repeated sprint ability (RSA)
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
RSA was assessed using the 6x20-m RSA test. A 20-second rest interval was provided between sprints. A photocell system (Smartspeed, Fusion Sport Pty, Queensland, Australia) was placed at the start and at the 20-m line to measure sprint time. The players started the test from the line marked 70 cm behind the first pair of photocells. The mean sprint time (mean sprint time over the six sprints) (RSAmean) and the total sprint time (total time over the six sprints) (RSAtotal) were used for the analysis.
After 6 weeks of training intervention
Vertical jump
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
Vertical jump performance was evaluated using the countermovement jump (CMJ) test. The test was performed using the My Jump Lab smartphone application (Spain, Madrid, version 1.2.2), which has proven validity and reliability for vertical jump measurement. Players were instructed to begin the jump with their feet shoulder-width apart, in a 90° knee flexion position, with their hands on their hips. During the test, players were instructed to jump as high as possible while keeping their hands on their hips. The mobile phone was positioned 3 meters away from the player, and the camera height was set to 0.90 meters using a tripod. The players first performed a familiarization trial at low intensity. Each player then performed three jumps, with two-minute passive recovery intervals. The highest jump was used for analysis
After 6 weeks of training intervention
Aerobic fitness
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of training intervention
Aerobic fitness was assessed using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIRTL-1). The test was conducted following previously described instructions (Bangsbo et al., 2008). The players' estimated maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) after the test was calculated using the formula ''VO2max = 36.4 + (0.0084 x covered distance in YYIRTL-1)''.
After 6 weeks of training intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AdnanMU-FSS-MTI-577954-280325-

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

I don't want to make any statement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Young Soccer Players

Clinical Trials on Combined training

Subscribe