Kupewa: Optimizing Implementation Strategies for Cervical Cancer Prevention
The goal of this clinical trial is identify an effective and implementable set of implementation strategies to increase cervical cancer prevention in Malawi. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Which implementation strategies produce the greatest increase in provider recommendation for, and uptake of, cervical cancer prevention tools among people receiving HIV care.
- What is the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and cost of these implementation strategies.
- What is the sustained effect of these implementation strategies. The implementation strategies will be conducted with health workers (clinical officers, nurses, and medical assistants): training, coaching, and a reminder system.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Corrina Moucheraud
- Phone Number: 212-992-6129
- Email: c.moucheraud@nyu.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Risa M Hoffman
- Email: RHoffman@mednet.ucla.edu
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lilongwe, Malawi
- Partners in Hope
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Health workers: People who provide medical care and counseling (typically medical assistants, clinical officers, and nurses), and interact with adolescent girls and young women aged 9-24 and/or their parents/caregivers.
- Clients: Non-pregnant females aged 9-24 (for those aged 9-17, their male or female parent/guardian will also be eligible for participation) who present for HIV care at a participating health facility during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Health workers: Less than 18 years of age, or not an active and regular provider of medical care or counseling at the facility, or unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
- Clients: <9 or >24 years old, or pregnancy, or unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Condition 1: In-person training
|
An in-person educational session.
|
|
Experimental: Condition 2: In-person training + Prompt
|
An in-person educational session.
Visual aide to remind providers to discuss cervical cancer prevention methods.
|
|
Experimental: Condition 3: In-person training + Coaching
|
An in-person educational session.
Short video vignettes plus reinforcing messages
|
|
Experimental: Condition 4: In-person training + Prompt + Coaching
|
An in-person educational session.
Short video vignettes plus reinforcing messages
Visual aide to remind providers to discuss cervical cancer prevention methods.
|
|
Experimental: Condition 5: Virtual training
|
A virtual educational session.
|
|
Experimental: Condition 6: Virtual training + Prompt
|
A virtual educational session.
Visual aide to remind providers to discuss cervical cancer prevention methods.
|
|
Experimental: Condition 7: Virtual training + Coaching
|
Short video vignettes plus reinforcing messages
A virtual educational session.
|
|
Experimental: Condition 8: Virtual training + Prompt + Coaching
|
Short video vignettes plus reinforcing messages
A virtual educational session.
Visual aide to remind providers to discuss cervical cancer prevention methods.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in prevalence of discussions surrounding methods of cervical cancer prevention
Time Frame: Months 7-18
|
Discussions about methods of cervical cancer prevention will be reported by clients following each routine HIV care visit.
This rate is defined as the percentage of visits during which there is a discussion about methods of cervical cancer prevention.
This rate will be compared between the groups with and without each intervention component.
|
Months 7-18
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in prevalence of completing a cervical cancer prevention program
Time Frame: Months 7-18
|
Completing a cervical cancer prevention program will be reported by clients following each routine HIV care visit.
This prevalence is defined as the percentage of clients who complete a cervical cancer prevention program.
This prevalence will be compared between the groups with and without each intervention component.
|
Months 7-18
|
|
Difference in prevalence of initiating a cervical cancer prevention program among those uninitiated
Time Frame: Months 7-18
|
This prevalence is defined among those who have not begun a cervical cancer prevention program at study entry.
This prevalence will be compared between the groups with and without each intervention component.
|
Months 7-18
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of the implementation strategies
Time Frame: Months 1-9
|
Health workers will be asked a set of questions to assess their perceived acceptability of the implementation strategies, based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire, and these will be combined into an acceptability score (ranging from 0-27 with a higher score indicating greater acceptability).
We will compare the average acceptability score between groups with and without each intervention component.
|
Months 1-9
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Corrina Moucheraud, New York University
- Principal Investigator: Risa M Hoffman, University of California, Los Angeles
- Principal Investigator: Sam Phiri, Partners in Hope, Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-FY2025-9686
- 1U01CA294756 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.