CPNF Intervention Development and Testing (Project SHIFT)
A User-Customizable Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention for Alcohol Harm Reduction in Young Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mary Larimer, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 206-543-3513
- Email: larimer@uw.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ty Tristao, BA
- Phone Number: (564) 225-2468
- Email: tt88@uw.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- The University of Washington
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled at the University of Washington either part- or full-time
- Report 3 or more past-month drinking occasions
- Report 3 or more drinks per occasion in the past month, on average
- Report 4 or more drinks during the peak drinking occasion in the past month
- Pass attention-check items
Exclusion Criteria:
N/A
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CPNF
Customizable personalized normative feedback (CPNF) intervention whereby individuals can explore normative feedback for a wider variety of referent groups so that PNF is a truly personalized and engaging experience.
|
The CPNF intervention allows individuals to explore normative feedback for a wider variety of referent groups so that PNF is a truly personalized and engaging experience.
|
|
Active Comparator: standard PNF
Standard personalized normative feedback.
|
Correcting misperceptions about peers' alcohol use behaviors and contrasting one's own use to the actual norms of their peers.
|
|
Active Comparator: Attention-Matched Control (AMC)
Attention-matched control.
|
Participants in the AMC condition will complete all measures at the same time as participants in the CPNF condition but will not receive any information on drinking norms.
Instead, participants in the AMC will receive normative feedback on sleep health, video game use, and gambling behaviors, and will similarly be able to choose the normative referent groups they wish to view feedback on for these behaviors.
The AMC will thus serve as a non-treatment comparison that controls for assessment reactivity and effects of history and maturation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Alcohol use - drinks per month
Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Daily Drinking Questionnaire will assess drinks on average over the past month by recording the number of drinks consumed on each day of a typical week.
Response options range from 0 drinks to 25+ drinks.
Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
|
Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
|
Alcohol use - Quantity per occasion
Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use Index will assess amount of alcohol consumed over the past month with how many days alcohol was consumed, average consumption, and peak consumption.
Response options range from 0 to 30 days for frequency, and 1 to 12+ drinks for quantity and peak.
Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
|
Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
|
Alcohol use - Heavy episodic drinking
Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Heavy Episodic Drinking measure will assess how many times over the past month heavy drinking episodes occurred, defined as 4 or more drinks (females) or 5 or more drinks (males) on a single occasion.
Response options range from 0 to 7 days.
Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
|
Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
|
Alcohol use - Peak drinks & peak BAC
Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Electronic Blood Alcohol content will be assessed and calculated using peak drinks over x amount of time.
A lower BAC is a better outcome, a higher BAC is a worse outcome.
|
Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
|
Alcohol use - Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
The AUDIT is a 10-item self-report screening tool assessing hazardous and harmful alcohol use over the past year.
Items are rated on varying 5-point Likert-type scales assessing frequency, quantity, and consequences of alcohol use.
Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
|
Alcohol use - Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
The Brief YAACQ is a 24-item assessment of alcohol-related consequences in young adults.
Response options for the items are yes or no.
Higher score (i.e. more 'yes' responses) is a worse outcome, lower score (i.e. more 'no' responses) is a better outcome.
|
Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived descriptive norms for each normative referent group
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Gathered via Shortened Drinking Norms Rating Form.
7 items assess belief for what's an acceptable number of drinks each day of the week with responses ranging from 0 to 25+ drinks.
|
Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
|
Perceived injunctive drinking norms for typical students at UW
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Gathered via the Injunctive Drinking Norms Rating Form.
7 items assess belief for what a typical UW college student drinks on each day of each day of the week with responses ranging from 0 to 25+ drinks.
|
Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mary Larimer, PhD, University of Washington
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00021161
- R34AA031336 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.