Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent HCC Post-TACE Using Twin Internally Cooled-Perfusion Electrodes (ERFA)
Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Trans-arterial Chemoembolization: A Prospective Study Using Twin Internally Cooled-Perfusion Electrodes
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary endpoint was defined as the 2-year cumulative incidence of LTP of the ablation index tumor, measured from the RFA date to first LTP occurrence. Secondary endpoints encompassed technical success rate, technique efficacy, RFA procedure characteristics, and progression-free survival (PFS) post-RFA. Data collection continued through July 31, 2020.
Between September 2017 and January 2019, we screened patients with recurrent HCC after TACE for study eligibility (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria specified: a) age between 20 and 85 years, b) Child-Pugh Class A liver function, and c) radiologically confirmed locally recurrent HCC following conventional TACE treatment.
Recurrent HCC was defined as the appearance of arterially enhancing tumor at the edge of the treated tumor, after at least one contrast-enhanced follow-up study had documented adequate lipiodol uptake and absence of viable tissue in the target tumor and surrounding ablation margin, as assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria (5). Recurrence was primarily diagnosed using contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT (n=73) or MRI (n=27). The exclusion criteria consisted of the following: a) more than three HCC nodules, b) tumors with an abutment length of ≥5 mm to the main hepatic veins or the first branches of the main portal vein, c) HCC nodules measuring 3 cm or larger, d) platelet count ≤50,000/mm³ or international normalized ratio prolongation ≥50%, e) extrahepatic metastasis or vascular invasion, f) Child-Pugh class B or C, g) poor performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status scale 3 or higher, and h) cases with poor acoustic window or inability to achieve percutaneous access.
RFA procedures RFA procedures were conducted under real-time US/CT/MR fusion guidance (Samsung, Navigator-GE & Siemens, PercuNav-Phillips) with conscious sedation by a radiologist (J.M.L.) with 26 years of clinical experience in RFA. The procedure utilized two 17-gauge internally cooled-perfusion electrodes and a multichannel RF generator (RF Medical Co., Seoul, Korea) in bipolar mode. In the bipolar mode, the current flows between the pair of electrodes and through this, a higher current density is maintained (12). The TICP electrodes featured two side holes (0.02 mm in diameter) on the active tips, through which 0.9% isotonic saline was perfused at approximately 1 cc/min for tissue perfusion and electrode cooling (Figure 2). A peristaltic pump (VIVA Pump; STARmed) maintained the active tip temperature at 20-25°C by circulating chilled normal saline. The ablation protocol aimed to completely ablate the entire tumor, including both the post-TACE area and locally recurrent lesion, while achieving a 5-10 mm wide ablation margin (13). Technical parameters, including current, impedance, power output, and total delivered energy, were continuously monitored. For subcapsular tumors, artificial ascites using 5% dextrose solution was employed in 80 patients (80.0%) to prevent organ damage and was subsequently aspirated post-procedure (14).
Evaluation of Procedure and Follow-up Technical success was defined as complete tumor treatment with full coverage by ablative margin ≥5 mm on immediate follow-up CT (15). One month after RFA, participants underwent contrast-enhanced CT (n=92) or MRI (n=8), serum alpha-fetoprotein measurements, and liver function tests. At this time point, technique efficacy was assessed, defined as complete ablation of macroscopic tumor (15). Ablation volume was quantified using the one-month follow-up images by measuring three orthogonal diameters (x, y, z) and calculating the volume using the formula: V=4/3 π× x × y × z (16). Follow-up imaging included contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT or MRI at 3, 6, and 12 months in the first year, followed by imaging every 3 months thereafter until study completion on July 31, 2020. LTP was defined as the appearance of enhancement at the ablation margin on contrast-enhanced imaging (11, 17). PFS encompassed all forms of disease progression, including not only LTP but also intrahepatic remote recurrence (defined as the presence of HCC in the liver at a site not contiguous with the ablation zone) and extrahepatic metastasis (defined as the spread of HCC to locations outside the liver) (11).
Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 27) and MedCalc (version 20.0.23). Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, and categorical variables using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Technical success, technique efficacy, and LTP rates were analyzed using per-patient data. Kaplan-Meier methods were employed for time-to-event analysis, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Seoul
-
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea, 03080
- Seoul National University Hosptial
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 20-85 years Child-Pugh Class A liver function Radiologically confirmed locally recurrent HCC following conventional TACE treatment Recurrent HCC defined as arterially enhancing tumor at the edge of treated tumor
Exclusion Criteria:
- More than three HCC nodules Tumors with ≥5 mm abutment length to main hepatic veins or first branches of main portal vein HCC nodules ≥3 cm Platelet count ≤50,000/mm³ or INR prolongation ≥50% Extrahepatic metastasis or vascular invasion Child-Pugh class B or C ECOG performance status ≥3 Poor acoustic window or inability to achieve percutaneous access
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Experimental: Bipolar RFA using TICP electrodes
All participants receive bipolar RFA treatment using TICP electrodesTreatment is conducted under real-time ultrasound-CT/MR fusion guidance
|
Device: Twin Internally Cooled-Perfusion (TICP) Electrodes Two 17-gauge internally cooled-perfusion electrodes Multichannel RF generator (RF Medical Co., Seoul, Korea) Bipolar mode application Saline perfusion rate: approximately 1 cc/min |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
2-year cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP)
Time Frame: Time Frame: 2 years
|
2-year cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) Description: LTP defined as the appearance of enhancement at the ablation margin on contrast-enhanced imaging
|
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SNUH 1611124811
- No. 06-2017-0260 (Other Grant/Funding Number: RF Medical)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Study Data/Documents
-
Study Protocol
Information identifier: No. 1611-124-811Information comments: http://cris.snuh.org
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Liver Neoplasms
-
NCT03753789TerminatedLiver Cancer | Cancer of the Liver | Neoplasms, Liver
-
NCT04107766TerminatedLiver Cancer | Cancer of the Liver | Neoplasms, Liver
-
NCT06681818RecruitingLiver Regeneration | Liver Cancer Adult
-
NCT02849015CompletedLiver Tumor | Evidence of Liver Transplantation
-
NCT05587556Active, not recruitingLiver Transplant, Liver Cancer, Immunosuppressant
-
NCT05516394Recruiting
-
NCT05123209Recruiting
Clinical Trials on Bipolar radiofrequency ablation using twin internally cooled perfusion electrodes
-
NCT05449860Active, not recruitingHepatocellular Carcinoma | Local Recurrence of Malignant Tumor of Liver
-
NCT03806218CompletedHepatocellular Carcinoma
-
NCT05449873RecruitingChronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis | Recurrent Hepatocellular Cancer
-
NCT00566787CompletedAtrial Fibrillation
-
NCT05397860RecruitingLiver Cirrhosis | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Chronic Liver Disease
-
NCT07171463Recruiting