Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent HCC Post-TACE Using Twin Internally Cooled-Perfusion Electrodes (ERFA)

April 8, 2026 updated by: Jeong Min Lee, Seoul National University Hospital

Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Trans-arterial Chemoembolization: A Prospective Study Using Twin Internally Cooled-Perfusion Electrodes

This single-center, prospective study evaluates the therapeutic outcomes of saline-augmented bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with twin internally cooled-perfusion (TICP) electrodes for treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary endpoint was defined as the 2-year cumulative incidence of LTP of the ablation index tumor, measured from the RFA date to first LTP occurrence. Secondary endpoints encompassed technical success rate, technique efficacy, RFA procedure characteristics, and progression-free survival (PFS) post-RFA. Data collection continued through July 31, 2020.

Between September 2017 and January 2019, we screened patients with recurrent HCC after TACE for study eligibility (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria specified: a) age between 20 and 85 years, b) Child-Pugh Class A liver function, and c) radiologically confirmed locally recurrent HCC following conventional TACE treatment.

Recurrent HCC was defined as the appearance of arterially enhancing tumor at the edge of the treated tumor, after at least one contrast-enhanced follow-up study had documented adequate lipiodol uptake and absence of viable tissue in the target tumor and surrounding ablation margin, as assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria (5). Recurrence was primarily diagnosed using contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT (n=73) or MRI (n=27). The exclusion criteria consisted of the following: a) more than three HCC nodules, b) tumors with an abutment length of ≥5 mm to the main hepatic veins or the first branches of the main portal vein, c) HCC nodules measuring 3 cm or larger, d) platelet count ≤50,000/mm³ or international normalized ratio prolongation ≥50%, e) extrahepatic metastasis or vascular invasion, f) Child-Pugh class B or C, g) poor performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status scale 3 or higher, and h) cases with poor acoustic window or inability to achieve percutaneous access.

RFA procedures RFA procedures were conducted under real-time US/CT/MR fusion guidance (Samsung, Navigator-GE & Siemens, PercuNav-Phillips) with conscious sedation by a radiologist (J.M.L.) with 26 years of clinical experience in RFA. The procedure utilized two 17-gauge internally cooled-perfusion electrodes and a multichannel RF generator (RF Medical Co., Seoul, Korea) in bipolar mode. In the bipolar mode, the current flows between the pair of electrodes and through this, a higher current density is maintained (12). The TICP electrodes featured two side holes (0.02 mm in diameter) on the active tips, through which 0.9% isotonic saline was perfused at approximately 1 cc/min for tissue perfusion and electrode cooling (Figure 2). A peristaltic pump (VIVA Pump; STARmed) maintained the active tip temperature at 20-25°C by circulating chilled normal saline. The ablation protocol aimed to completely ablate the entire tumor, including both the post-TACE area and locally recurrent lesion, while achieving a 5-10 mm wide ablation margin (13). Technical parameters, including current, impedance, power output, and total delivered energy, were continuously monitored. For subcapsular tumors, artificial ascites using 5% dextrose solution was employed in 80 patients (80.0%) to prevent organ damage and was subsequently aspirated post-procedure (14).

Evaluation of Procedure and Follow-up Technical success was defined as complete tumor treatment with full coverage by ablative margin ≥5 mm on immediate follow-up CT (15). One month after RFA, participants underwent contrast-enhanced CT (n=92) or MRI (n=8), serum alpha-fetoprotein measurements, and liver function tests. At this time point, technique efficacy was assessed, defined as complete ablation of macroscopic tumor (15). Ablation volume was quantified using the one-month follow-up images by measuring three orthogonal diameters (x, y, z) and calculating the volume using the formula: V=4/3 π× x × y × z (16). Follow-up imaging included contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT or MRI at 3, 6, and 12 months in the first year, followed by imaging every 3 months thereafter until study completion on July 31, 2020. LTP was defined as the appearance of enhancement at the ablation margin on contrast-enhanced imaging (11, 17). PFS encompassed all forms of disease progression, including not only LTP but also intrahepatic remote recurrence (defined as the presence of HCC in the liver at a site not contiguous with the ablation zone) and extrahepatic metastasis (defined as the spread of HCC to locations outside the liver) (11).

Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 27) and MedCalc (version 20.0.23). Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, and categorical variables using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Technical success, technique efficacy, and LTP rates were analyzed using per-patient data. Kaplan-Meier methods were employed for time-to-event analysis, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Seoul
      • Seoul, Seoul, South Korea, 03080
        • Seoul National University Hosptial

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 20-85 years Child-Pugh Class A liver function Radiologically confirmed locally recurrent HCC following conventional TACE treatment Recurrent HCC defined as arterially enhancing tumor at the edge of treated tumor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than three HCC nodules Tumors with ≥5 mm abutment length to main hepatic veins or first branches of main portal vein HCC nodules ≥3 cm Platelet count ≤50,000/mm³ or INR prolongation ≥50% Extrahepatic metastasis or vascular invasion Child-Pugh class B or C ECOG performance status ≥3 Poor acoustic window or inability to achieve percutaneous access

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Experimental: Bipolar RFA using TICP electrodes
All participants receive bipolar RFA treatment using TICP electrodesTreatment is conducted under real-time ultrasound-CT/MR fusion guidance

Device: Twin Internally Cooled-Perfusion (TICP) Electrodes

Two 17-gauge internally cooled-perfusion electrodes Multichannel RF generator (RF Medical Co., Seoul, Korea) Bipolar mode application Saline perfusion rate: approximately 1 cc/min

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP)
Time Frame: Time Frame: 2 years
2-year cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) Description: LTP defined as the appearance of enhancement at the ablation margin on contrast-enhanced imaging
Time Frame: 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Timing:, after publication Access Process: submission of a request to the authors). Conditions for Use: for academic purposes only

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Conditions for Use: for academic purposes only

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: No. 1611-124-811
    Information comments: http://cris.snuh.org

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Bipolar radiofrequency ablation using twin internally cooled perfusion electrodes

Subscribe