Dysphagia Risk in Rheumatic Diseases
Assessment of Dysphagia Risk in Individuals With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kınıklı
-
Denizli, Kınıklı, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Pamukkale University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.)
- Being 18 years of age or older
- Having the cognitive ability to answer the questionnaires
- Volunteering to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having any neurological or psychological disorder that may prevent participation
- Having a psychiatric disorder severe enough to affect cooperation
- Being hospitalized during an acute flare
- History of active gastrointestinal surgery within the last 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
The primary outcome is the risk of dysphagia in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, measured using a validated questionnaire administered once to each participant.
The swallowing function was assessed using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10).
The scale consists of 10 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 40.
Higher scores indicate a greater severity of swallowing impairment (a score of ≥3 is considered indicative of dysphagia)
|
at baseline
|
|
Fonseca Anamnestic Questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline
|
The severity of temporomandibular disorders was assessed using the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI).
The index consists of 10 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate a greater severity of temporomandibular dysfunction
|
at baseline
|
|
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS).
The scale consists of 15 items scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total and subscale scores are calculated, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and a worse clinical condition.
|
at baseline
|
|
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
The patient's functional level of oral intake was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS).
The scale is a 7-point ordinal scale with scores ranging from 1 to 7. Unlike many other clinical tools, higher scores on the FOIS indicate better functional oral intake, with a score of 1 representing total tube dependency and a score of 7 representing total oral intake with no restrictions.
|
at baseline
|
|
Mediterranean Diet Quality Index (KIDMED)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
Nutritional habits and adherence to the Mediterranean diet were evaluated using the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index (KIDMED).
The index is based on a 16-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from -4 to 12. Higher scores indicate better adherence to the Mediterranean diet and higher dietary quality.
|
at baseline
|
|
Reflux Symptom Index (RSI)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
The severity of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms was assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI).
The index is a 9-item self-reported questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate a greater severity of symptoms, with a score of 13 or higher typically considered as clinically significant for reflux.
|
at baseline
|
|
Malnutrition Inflammation Score
Time Frame: at baseline
|
Nutritional status and inflammation levels were assessed using the Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS).
The score consists of 10 components, including clinical history, physical examination, body mass index, and laboratory parameters (serum albumin and total iron-binding capacity).
Each component is scored from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 30.
Higher scores indicate a greater severity of malnutrition and inflammation.
|
at baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PAU 2026 01 DYSPHAGIA
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.