Intraoperative Rectal Lavage to Prevent Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter Randomized Trial (TOWER-2)
Laparoscopic Rectal Irrigation for the Prevention of Local Recurrence After Radical Resection of Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-controlled Clinical Study
Brief Summaries Trial Purpose The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical trial is to evaluate whether intraoperative rectal irrigation during laparoscopic radical resection of low-to-mid rectal cancer reduces postoperative local recurrence rates compared to no irrigation. Secondary objectives include assessing overall survival, incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage, stenosis), and quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ-C30 scale).
Participants Will:
- Undergo laparoscopic radical resection with or without rectal irrigation (based on randomization);
- Follow standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols postoperatively;
- Attend scheduled follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post-surgery, including clinical evaluations, imaging (CT/MRI), laboratory tests (CEA), and questionnaire assessments;
- Maintain a symptom diary and record rescue inhaler usage (if applicable).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative rectal lavage in preventing local recurrence after laparoscopic radical resection for mid-to-low rectal cancer. Despite significant improvements in rectal cancer outcomes through standardized total mesorectal excision (TME) techniques and neoadjuvant therapy, local recurrence remains a serious clinical challenge with poor prognosis. Evidence suggests that exfoliated tumor cells within the bowel lumen may contribute to anastomotic seeding and subsequent local recurrence. Intraoperative manipulation of the tumor and use of circular staplers during anastomosis may further increase the risk of tumor cell dissemination. Rectal lavage represents a potential strategy to eliminate these free intraluminal malignant cells through mechanical flushing and/or cytotoxic effects of lavage solutions.
The study will enroll approximately 1,598 patients (accounting for a 10% dropout rate) across multiple centers in China. Participants must be 18-75 years of age with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum, where the tumor's distal margin is located within 10 cm of the anal verge. All patients must be scheduled to undergo laparoscopic radical resection with sphincter preservation. Key exclusion criteria include history of other malignancies, abdominoperineal resection (Miles procedure) or Hartmann's procedure, emergency surgery for bowel obstruction, severe organ dysfunction contraindicating surgery, pregnancy or lactation, and serious psychiatric disorders.
Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (rectal lavage with normal saline/povidone-iodine solution) or the control group (no rectal lavage). Both groups will receive standardized laparoscopic TME procedures performed by experienced surgical teams, followed by identical Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. The primary endpoint is the rate of local recurrence. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, incidence of postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, wound infection, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, urinary tract infection) graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system, and quality of life at 6 months postoperatively assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Participants will undergo scheduled follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after surgery, including clinical evaluations, imaging studies (CT/MRI), laboratory tests (CEA levels), and quality of life questionnaires. The study hypothesizes that the local recurrence rate will be 6% in the rectal lavage group compared to 10% in the control group. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and 80% statistical power, this sample size will provide adequate power to detect this clinically significant difference. This investigation will provide high-quality evidence regarding the role of intraoperative rectal lavage in preventing local recurrence after laparoscopic resection of mid-to-low rectal cancer, potentially establishing a simple yet effective intervention to improve oncological outcomes in this patient population.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Liang Huang, Doctor
- Phone Number: +86 15989101216
- Email: huangl75@sysu.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 518000
- Recruiting
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
-
Contact:
- Liang Huang, Doctor
- Phone Number: 13612929488
- Email: huangl75@sysu.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 75 years old.
- Pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma.
- Mid-to-low rectal cancer with the tumor lower margin located ≤10 cm from the anal verge.
- Underwent laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer with sphincter preservation.
- Without concomitant multiple primary malignancies.
- Adequate organ function.
- Patients or their family members were able to understand the study protocol, willing to participate in this study, and provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant other malignancies or a history of prior malignancies.
- Abdominal perineal resection (Miles' operation) or Hartmann's procedure.
- Failure to open the peritoneal reflection during surgery.
- History of previous pelvic floor surgery.
- Emergency surgery due to bowel obstruction.
- Severe hepatic, renal, cardiopulmonary, or coagulation dysfunction, or other severe comorbidities that render the patient unable to tolerate the procedure.
- History of severe psychiatric disorders.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Any other clinical or laboratory conditions considered unsuitable for participation in the trial by the investigators.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer followed by irrigation of the rectal cavity with normal saline / povidone-iodine
|
Laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer followed by irrigation of the rectal cavity with normal saline / povidone-iodine
|
|
No Intervention: control group
No irrigation of the rectal stump was performed after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative local recurrence rate
Time Frame: Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
The postoperative local recurrence rate following laparoscopic radical resection for mid-to-low rectal cancer is defined as the number of patients with recurrence divided by the total number of subjects.
|
Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
Postoperative complications-including anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, urinary tract infection, etc.-were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
|
Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
|
Postoperative overall survival
Time Frame: Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
Postoperative Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the length of time from the date of surgery to the date of death from any cause.
|
Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
|
Health-related quality of life at 6 months
Time Frame: Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
Health-related quality of life at 6 months postoperatively was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
|
Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026ZSLYEC-159
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer Surgery
-
NCT07189780Not yet recruitingRectal Cancer Surgery
-
NCT07035600Not yet recruitingRectal Cancer | Rectal Cancer Patients | Rectal Cancer Surgery | Rectal Cancer, Radiotherapy
-
NCT07358247Not yet recruitingRectal Cancer Patients | Rectal Cancer Surgery
-
NCT04270500RecruitingThe Impact of Physical Exercise on Sleep in Colorectal Cancer Patients During Prehabilitation PeriodSurgery | Colo-rectal Cancer
-
NCT06405308CompletedRectal Cancer | Robotic Surgery | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery
-
NCT03570684UnknownModification of Rectal Cancer Surgery
-
NCT07463261RecruitingLocal Advanced Rectal Cancer | Rectal Cancer Surgery | Low Rectal Cancer | Middle Rectal Cancer | TME
-
NCT07346248Enrolling by invitationAdult Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Indicated to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery
-
NCT07432542Active, not recruitingIleus | Intestinal Obstruction | Rectal Cancer Surgery | Middle and Low Rectal Cancer
-
NCT06505863CompletedQuality of Life | Rectal Cancer | Surgery | Functional Outcome
Clinical Trials on Rectal irrigation
-
NCT06100055RecruitingConstipation | Constipation - Functional | Defecation Disorder | Constipation by Outlet Obstruction
-
NCT07558499Not yet recruitingPremature | NEC - Necrotizing Enterocolitis | Gut Microbiota Diversity and Composition
-
NCT06569446Not yet recruitingConstipation - Functional | Defecation Disorder | Faecal Incontinence | Obstructive Defecation Syndrome | Constipation by Outlet Obstruction | Faecal Smearing
-
NCT02912286Unknown
-
NCT07249450Completed
-
NCT00866892WithdrawnFacial and Scalp Lacerations
-
NCT01943370CompletedChronic Rhinosinusitis
-
NCT02688244UnknownAcute Disease | Appendicitis | Abdominal Abscess | Cecal Diseases | Infection
-
NCT00854815CompletedPerforated Appendicitis