Irrigation Versus Suction in Complicated Acute Appendicitis (ISAAC)

February 17, 2016 updated by: Jesus Abrisqueta Carrion, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

Randomized Trial Comparing Irrigation Versus Suction in Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in Adults

This study evaluates the intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated acute appendicitis performing irrigation of the abdominal cavity or only suction without lavage.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite the available literature for and against the irrigation of the abdominal cavity in complicated acute appendicitis, in the current practice of this and other centres, the irrigation and no irrigation is made equally depending on the surgeon who performs the intervention.

Those who systematically irrigate the abdominal cavity in laparoscopic appendectomies do it as an inherited act from open surgery and those who systematically do not irrigate the abdominal cavity base their choice in theories such as abscess migration due to the irrigation and difficulty of the suction of all the irrigated fluid, spreading, therefore, the infection.

The intention of the investigators is to provide evidence about this technique in order to either systematize peritoneal irrigation in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis or avoid an unnecessary gesture, if it were established so.

This will be a prospective, randomized clinical trial involving patients who present to the hospital with complicated acute appendicitis. Power calculation was based on abscess rate in the investigators' hospital calculated retrospectively (15%) Subjects will be those patients above 18 y.o. who are found to have complicated acute appendicitis (defined as perforated appendicitis before or during surgery, gangrenous appendicitis and/or purulent peritonitis).

The final decision to include a patient in the study will made after complication has been visually confirmed during surgery. The randomization assignment will be made known at the initiation of the operation, and confirmation of complication will confirm the patient will utilize the next randomization slot.

The irrigation group will have suction irrigator set up with a 1 liter bag of normal saline. The surgeon must use at least 300 ml of this bag but may use as much as they choose.

The no irrigation group will have the suction irrigator set up without the saline attachment. This will leave them with the capacity for suction only. Since several suction devices exist, this will assure the same type of suction for both groups.

After the operation, both groups will be managed in the same manner. When the patient is tolerating a regular diet, on oral pain medication and has been afebrile for over 12 hours, they will be discharged on oral antibiotics to complete a course of 7 days. If the participants stay until the 5th post-operative day, a white blood cell count will be checked, which if it is normal, they will be discharged to home without antibiotics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Murcia, Spain, 30120
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
        • Contact:
          • Jesus Abrisqueta, Ph D
          • Phone Number: +34 968369677
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Juan Lujan, Ph D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Maria Teresa Soriano, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with complicated acute appendiccitis
  • Laparoscopic approach

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open approach
  • Medical or psychiatric condition of the patient that compromises the informed consent authorisation
  • Non complicated acute appendicitis
  • Underage patients (<18)
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Irrigation
Irrigation of the area with at least 300ml normal saline using the power suction/irrigator
Irrigation of the abdominal cavity with at least 300ml of normal saline using the power suction/irrigator
Other Names:
  • Washout
Active Comparator: No irrigation
Only suction with the power suction/irrigator without saline attached
Suction only, using suction device
Other Names:
  • Suction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of post-operative abscess
Time Frame: 1 month
Number of post-operative abscesses in each arm
1 month
Location of post-operative abscess
Time Frame: One month
Number of abscesses in every quadrant of the abdomen
One month
Treatment of post-operative abscess
Time Frame: One month
Number of post-operative abscesses treated with a radiological drain
One month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operating time
Time Frame: 1 day
Length of surgery, in minutes.
1 day
Hospital stay (Time until discharge)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Time until discharge, in days.
2 weeks
Postoperative pain (Visual analogic scale)
Time Frame: 6 days
Visual analogic scale, from 1 to 10
6 days
Postoperatory fever
Time Frame: 6 days
Body temperature in Celsius degrees
6 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Disease

Clinical Trials on Irrigation

3
Subscribe