Postoperative Pain Following Irrigation With Endodontic Needle, Sonic and Passive Ultrasonic Techniques

September 22, 2016 updated by: Nancy Samy, Cairo University

Postoperative Pain Following Irrigation With Endodontic Needle, Sonic and Passive Ultrasonic Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative pain after root canal treatment following irrigation by endodontic needle, sonic and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Different irrigation delivery systems are introduced to the market aiming to improve root canals disinfection. The conventional endodontic needle is commonly used because of its ease in use and good control of needle depth and irrigant volume. However it carries a higher risk of extruding the solution periapically because of positive pressure used in solution delivery.

Passive ultrasonic irrigation is a noncutting irrigation technique that is done with ultrasonically activated files with continuous or intermittent flow of irrigant. It was shown that it is effective in removing remnants of pulp tissue, dentin debris and planktonic bacteria.

The vibringe (Cavex Holland BV, Haarlem, the Netherlands) is an irrigation device that combines manual delivery and sonic activation of the irrigant.

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative pain after root canal treatment following irrigation by endodontic needle, sonic and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

57

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 56 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or Females
  • Age between 16-60 years old
  • Permanent Mandibular molars with:

    • Non-vital response of pulp tissue
    • Absence of spontaneous pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant females
  • Patients having significant systemic disorder
  • Patients received analgesics, anti-inflammatory or antibiotic in the last 24 hours
  • Teeth that have:

    • Vital pulp tissues
    • Association with swelling or fistulous tract
    • Acute periapical abscess
    • Greater than grade I mobility
    • Pocket depth greater than 5mm
    • Previous endodontic treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional needle irrigation
side-vented needle used for endodontic irrigation
conventional side-vented syringe used to deliver irrigant in root canal treatment
Experimental: passive ultrasonic irrigation
IrriSafe ultrasonic tip used for irrigation agitation in endodontic treatment
ultrasonic tip (IrriSafe) activate the irrigant after mechanical preparation in root canal treatment
Experimental: sonic irrigation
Vibringe is a sonic irrigation system used to irrigate and activate the irrigant at same time
vibringe system is a sonic device that deliver and agitate the irrigant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain measured by numerical rate scale
Time Frame: 4 hours after treatment
Numerical rate scale (NRS) consists of a line graded from 0-10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst pain, patient will choose the number that describe his pain level.
4 hours after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth,Non-vital

Clinical Trials on conventional needle irrigation

Subscribe