Centralized Telephone Outreach to Assist Smoking Cessation Among Veterans

Smoking cessation interventions including behavioral and pharmacological components have been demonstrated to be both effective and cost-effective. Although there is a high prevalence of smoking and smoking-related disorders among veterans who use VA medical centers for health care, rates of identification of tobacco use and provision of brief and/or intensive smoking cessation services are suboptimal. Telephone outreach (TO) may serve to increase access to counseling and medications to assist smoking cessation. From the standpoint of health systems, TO provides the opportunity for centralized oversight and quality assurance, economy of scale, and dissemination strategies that are practical to implement. At the provider level, TO addresses barriers to delivery of services such as limited time and skills. From the standpoint of the smoker, attractions of TO include accessibility, convenience, and privacy.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Smoking; Smoking Cessation
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Telephone Care

Detailed Description

Background:

Smoking cessation interventions including behavioral and pharmacological components have been demonstrated to be both effective and cost-effective. Although there is a high prevalence of smoking and smoking-related disorders among veterans who use VA medical centers for health care, rates of identification of tobacco use and provision of brief and/or intensive smoking cessation services are suboptimal. Telephone outreach (TO) may serve to increase access to counseling and medications to assist smoking cessation. From the standpoint of health systems, TO provides the opportunity for centralized oversight and quality assurance, economy of scale, and dissemination strategies that are practical to implement. At the provider level, TO addresses barriers to delivery of services such as limited time and skills. From the standpoint of the smoker, attractions of TO include accessibility, convenience, and privacy.

Objectives:

The objectives of the study are to: 1) determine if TO increases successful quitting among veterans who smoke, compared to the distribution of written self-help materials; and 2) determine the cost-effectiveness of TO for smoking cessation for veterans who smoke.

Methods:

The study involved a population-based sample of veterans in VISN 13 who use one of the five Network VAMCs for primary care. 838 smokers were recruited, enrolled and randomly assigned to 1) written self-help materials + TO, or 2) written self-help materials alone. The behavioral intervention protocol included follow-up calls scheduled in a relapse-sensitive fashion. Use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) was encouraged, and prescriptions facilitated. Data was collected at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months by telephone. Information on demographic characteristics, medical and mental health histories, smoking history, intervention, and use of clinical services for smoking cessation was included. Cost data will be calculated from administrative databases, and will include 1) written materials, 2) counseling (personnel time, equipment, space), and 3) medications. The primary outcome was 6 months of prolonged abstinence from smoking, measured 12 months following intervention. Secondary analyses evaluated 3 month and 12 month point prevalent abstinence from smoking, quit attempts, and a formal cost-effectiveness analysis that will include total costs, total and marginal effects and cost-effectiveness ratios (average cost/quit and average cost/marginal quit) for TO and SH interventions.

Status:

Data collection and main outcome analyses have been completed. The main manuscript will be submitted to JAMA in October 2004. We are starting cost-effectiveness analyses.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 800
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Minnesota
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
      • Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must be smokers who have a phone and who speak English. They are excluded for psychiatric instability.

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Other: Arm 1	Procedure: Telephone Care

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: US Department of Veterans Affairs
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Anne M. Joseph, MD MPH, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• An LC, Zhu SH, Nelson DB, Arikian NJ, Nugent S, Partin MR, Joseph AM. Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):536-42. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.536.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Completion (Actual): September 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 14, 2001
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 15, 2001
• First Posted (Estimate): March 16, 2001

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): April 7, 2015
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 6, 2015
• Last Verified: February 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: SUI 99-101