- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00048061
MOBILE Study - A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) Regimens in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis
February 28, 2018 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Groups, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Monthly Oral Administration of 100 mg and 150 mg Ibandronate With 2.5 mg Daily Oral Ibandronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens of oral Bonviva tablets in women with post-menopausal osteoporosis.
Patients will also receive daily supplementation with vitamin D and calcium.
The anticipated time of study treatment is 2+ years, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
1609
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Adelaide, Australia, 5000
-
Adelaide, Australia, 5035
-
Parkville, Australia, 3052
-
Perth, Australia, 6979
-
-
-
-
-
Liege, Belgium, 4020
-
Merksem, Belgium, 2170
-
-
-
-
-
Campinas, Brazil, 13077-005
-
Curitiba, Brazil, 80060-240
-
Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90035-003
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04026-000
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 2N6
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1B2
-
-
Quebec
-
Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, G1V 3M7
-
-
-
-
-
Plzen, Czechia, 305 99
-
Praha, Czechia, 128 00
-
Praha, Czechia, 169 02
-
-
-
-
-
Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
-
Ballerup, Denmark, 2750
-
Vejle, Denmark, 7100
-
-
-
-
-
Caen, France, 14033
-
Lyon, France, 69437
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 12200
-
Hannover, Germany, 30167
-
-
-
-
-
Balatonfuered, Hungary, 8230
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1083
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1036
-
Kiskunhalas, Hungary, 6400
-
Zalaegerszeg, Hungary, 8900
-
-
-
-
-
Siena, Italy, 53100
-
Valeggio Sul Mincio, Italy, 37067
-
-
-
-
-
Leon, Mexico, 37000
-
Obregon, Mexico, 85100
-
-
-
-
-
Haugesund, Norway, 5507
-
Oslo, Norway, 0176
-
Stavanger, Norway, 4010
-
-
-
-
-
Krakow, Poland, 31-501
-
Warszawa, Poland, 04-730
-
-
-
-
-
Bucharest, Romania, 011025
-
-
-
-
-
Cape Town, South Africa, 7500
-
Johannesburg, South Africa, 2196
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08907
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
-
-
-
-
-
Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
-
-
-
-
-
Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF64 2XX
-
Liverpool, United Kingdom, L22 0LG
-
London, United Kingdom, E11 1NR
-
Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
-
-
-
-
California
-
Irvine, California, United States, 92618
-
Loma Linda, California, United States, 92357
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90211
-
Oakland, California, United States, 94612
-
Rancho Mirage, California, United States, 92270
-
-
Colorado
-
Lakewood, Colorado, United States, 80227
-
-
Florida
-
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32607
-
-
Maryland
-
Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20817
-
Wheaton, Maryland, United States, 20902
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
-
-
Montana
-
Billings, Montana, United States, 59120
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68131
-
-
New Jersey
-
Livingston, New Jersey, United States, 07039
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23294
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98144
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
55 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women 55-80 years of age;
- post-menopausal for >= 5 years;
- ambulatory.
Exclusion Criteria:
- malignant disease diagnosed within the previous 10 years (except basal cell cancer that has been successfully removed);
- breast cancer within the previous 20 years;
- allergy to bisphosphonates;
- previous treatment with an intravenous bisphosphonate at any time;
- previous treatment with an oral bisphosphonate within the last 6 months, >1 month of treatment within the last year, or >3 months of treatment within the last 2 years.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ibandronate 2.5 mg
Participants will receive 2.5 milligram (mg) ibandronate Per oral (PO) daily and an oblong placebo tablet PO monthly.
Participants will also receive calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 international units (IU)/day .
|
2.5mg po daily
100mg po monthly on a single day
100mg po monthly over 2 consecutive days
150mg po monthly
500 mg/day
400 IU/day
|
|
Experimental: Ibandronate 50/50 mg
Participants will receive 100 mg ibandronate PO monthly taken on a single day (2 X 50 mg tablets) and round placebo tablet PO daily.
Participants will also receive calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day.
|
2.5mg po daily
100mg po monthly on a single day
100mg po monthly over 2 consecutive days
150mg po monthly
500 mg/day
400 IU/day
|
|
Experimental: Ibandronate 100 mg
Participants will receive 100 mg ibandronate PO monthly divided over two consecutive days (50 mg tablet/day) and a round placebo tablet PO daily.
Participants will also receive calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day
|
2.5mg po daily
100mg po monthly on a single day
100mg po monthly over 2 consecutive days
150mg po monthly
500 mg/day
400 IU/day
|
|
Experimental: Ibandronate 150 mg
Participants will receive 150 mg ibandronate PO monthly taken on a single day and a round placebo tablet PO daily.
Participants will also receive calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day
|
2.5mg po daily
100mg po monthly on a single day
100mg po monthly over 2 consecutive days
150mg po monthly
500 mg/day
400 IU/day
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Month 12
|
Relative change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is the percentage change from baseline of BMD of vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center after 12 months of treatment.
It is calculated as the sum of bone mineral content divided by the sum of area of all lumbar vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process at Month 12. Participants available at particular time point for assessment were included in the analysis.
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Month 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Month 24
|
Relative change in BMD is the percentage change from baseline of BMD of vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center after 24 months of treatment.
It is calculated as the sum of bone mineral content divided by the sum of area of all lumbar vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process at Month 24.
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Month 24
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
The absolute change (g/cm^2) from baseline in mean BMD of the lumbar spine (L2 - L4) at one and two years.
A difference in the mean values between the active groups and the control was calculated.
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
|
Relative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
Proximal femur BMD was measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry at baseline, after one and two years of treatment and was read by a central reading center.
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
Proximal femur BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline, after one and two years of treatment and was read by a central reading center
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean lumber spine (L2 - L4) BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean total hip BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean trochanter BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean femoral neck BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean total hip and mean lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean trochanter and lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Months 12 and 24
|
A participant is a responder if the mean femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
|
Months 12 and 24
|
|
Relative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6, 12, 24
|
Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed using the Elecsys S-CTX-I assay (an ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) Technique).
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6, 12, 24
|
|
Absolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed using the Elecsys S-CTX-I assay (an ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) Technique).
|
From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Event
Time Frame: Up to Month 24
|
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.
|
Up to Month 24
|
|
Number Of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Up to Month 24
|
Marked laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the reference range and showed a clinically relevant change from baseline.
The reference range for hemoglobin was 110-200 (gram per liter [g/L]), hematocrit was 0.31-0.56
fraction, white blood cells (WBC) was 3.0-18.0
(10*9/L), serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT/ALT) was 0-110 IU/L, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was 0.0-14.3
(millimoles per Liter [mmol/L]), Chloride was 95-115 (mmol/L), Potassium was 3.0 - 6.0 (mmol/L), Sodium was 130-150 (mmol/L), Calcium was 2.00-2.90
(mmol/L), Phosphate was 0.75 - 1.60 (mmol/L) and Creatinine was 0- 154 (micromoles/liter [umol/L].
|
Up to Month 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2002
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2004
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2004
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2002
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 24, 2002
First Posted (Estimate)
October 25, 2002
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 29, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 28, 2018
Last Verified
February 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BM16549
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Post Menopausal Osteoporosis
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisBosnia and Herzegovina
-
NovartisCompletedPost-menopausal OsteoporosisGermany, Denmark
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneMinistry of Health, FranceRecruitingPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
AmgenCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisSpain, South Africa, Germany, Mexico, United States, Canada, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, Australia, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Czech Republic, Norway
-
Hoffmann-La RocheGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedPost-menopausal OsteoporosisColombia, Belgium, Sweden, Hong Kong, United States, Hungary, Switzerland, Australia, Germany, Italy, Canada, Poland, Argentina, Thailand, Norway, New Zealand, France, Finland
-
University College, LondonWithdrawnPost-menopausal OsteoporosisUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost-Menopausal OsteoporosisTurkey, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of, Serbia
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisBelgium, Luxembourg, Austria, Greece, Ireland
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisPoland, Slovakia, Hungary, Russian Federation, Latvia, Romania, Slovenia
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost-Menopausal OsteoporosisUnited States, Germany, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Belgium, Mexico, Poland, Denmark, France, Norway, Brazil, Czechia
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisSpain, South Africa, Germany, Mexico, United States, Canada, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, Australia, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Czech Republic, Norway
-
Hoffmann-La RocheGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
Hoffmann-La RocheGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisFinland