CJD (Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease) Quinacrine Study

Novel Therapeutics For Prion Diseases: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy of Quinacrine in the Treatment of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of the medication quinacrine on survival in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)is a rapidly progressive, invariably fatal and untreatable neurodegenerative disease with a mean duration of about eight months. Beyond the debilitating cognitive and motor deficits that accompany CJD, the difficulty in treating behavioral and mood disturbances and the rapidity of its course compound its tragedy. Recent results from experiments show that, at physiological concentrations, the anti-malarial drug quinacrine permanently clears abnormal prion proteins from cell culture. The demonstrated efficacy of quinacrine in cell culture, its relative safety and well known side-effects in the clinical setting, and the universal fatality of CJD justify quinacrine as an immediate candidate for the treatment of CJD.

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of the medication quinacrine on survival in sporadic CJD (sCJD). This will be accomplished by bringing approximately 60 patients with probable or definite sCJD over approximately three years to UCSF for evaluation and initiation of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled (delayed treatment start) treatment study of quinacrine. Each patient will have a 50:50 chance of being placed on quinacrine or placebo upon study enrollment; however, all patients will be offered quinacrine after two months. Prior to study enrollment, patients will have a comprehensive clinical assessment to confirm the diagnosis of sCJD. Participants will come to UCSF for initial evaluation, potential study enrollment and, if possible, return to UCSF for follow-up at two and twelve months. Patients will receive telephone follow-up (every 2 weeks for the first two months and monthly thereafter) and local blood and testing to monitor for possible medication toxicity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of probable or definite sCJD: Definite--biopsy confirmed sCJD; Probable--a progressive dementia with either a typical EEG or a typical MRI consistent with sCJD, and at least two of the following clinical features: myoclonus, pyramidal or extrapyramidal signs, visual symptoms, cerebellar signs, akinetic mutism, other focal higher cortical neurologic signs (e.g. neglect, apraxia, aphasia)
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Able to swallow
  • Able to follow simple one-step commands
  • Have had a brain MRI within 6 months and an EEG within 3 months ruling out other etiologies such as masses, strokes, or non-convulsive status epilepticus
  • Consent to autopsy in the event of their death during or after the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of other significant or life-threatening disease, including: cancer; end-stage liver or renal disease; severe heart disease
  • History of other disease requiring regular supportive care
  • Liver disease
  • Active alcoholism
  • Bone marrow suppression
  • Severe hypotension
  • Severe psoriasis
  • Poorly controlled diabetes
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Men, or women of childbearing age, not practicing reliable contraception
  • Serious allergies to quinacrine or other acridines
  • Current or recent use of quinacrine (within 6 months)
  • < 18 years of age
  • Any other contraindication to taking quinacrine
  • Genetic form of prion disease is identified prior to study enrollment
  • Current use of anti-arrhythmics (at discretion of investigator)
  • G6PD (Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase) deficiency (at discretion of investigator)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
100mg by mouth three times a day
Experimental: quinacrine
100mg by mouth three times a day
Other Names:
  • Atabrine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Survival
Time Frame: Randomization to Month-2
Participants alive after 2 months on study treatment
Randomization to Month-2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) After 2 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to Month-2
The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) is a brief 30-point questionnaire that is used to screen for cognitive impairment. In about 10 minutes it samples functions including arithmetic, memory and orientation. A score greater than or equal to 25 points (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition. Lower scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-18 points) or mild (19-24 points) cognitive impairment. Low to very low scores correlate closely with the presence of dementia, although other mental disorders can also lead to abnormal findings on MMSE testing.
Baseline to Month-2
Barthel Score Change After 2 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 2 months
An ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 (worst, fully dependent) to 100 (best, independent); higher score associated with a greater likelihood of being able to live at home with a degree of independence following discharge from hospital. 10 individual items are scored and summed to derive the overall Barthel index score. Each item may be scored 0, 5, 10 or 15; not all items use the full range of 4 possible values. The amount of time and physical assistance required to perform each item are considered in scoring each item. For subjects unable to return for month-2 visit, Barthel Index was performed via telephone.
baseline, 2 months
Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDRS-SB) After 2 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDRS-SB). The CDR is obtained through semistructured interviews of patients and informants, and cognitive functioning is rated in 6 domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning: 0, no impairment; 0.5, questionable impairment; 1, mild impairment; 2, moderate impairment; and 3, severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). The global CDR score is computed via an algorithm. The CDR-SB score is obtained by summing each of the domain box scores, with scores ranging from 0 to 18. A higher value and/or positive change is worse. For subjects unable to return for month-2 visit, CDRS-SB was performed via telephone.
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Rankin Score After 2 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death. 0 - No symptoms.

  1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
  2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
  3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted.
  4. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted.
  5. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.
  6. - Dead. For subjects unable to return for the 2-month visit, Rankin score was assessed via telephone.
Baseline, 2 months
ADAS-Cog Change After 2 Months Among Survivors
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
ADAS-cog measures cognitive performance by combining ratings of 11 components (word recall, word recognition, constructional praxis, orientation, naming objects and fingers, commands, ideational praxis, remembering instruction, spoken language, word finding, comprehension) representing six areas of cognition: memory; language; orientation to time, place and person; construction of simple designs and planning; and performing simple behaviors in pursuit of a basic, predefined goal. Seven components are scored as the 'number incorrect'. For example, in the commands component, the number of five commands performed incorrectly (range: 0-5). Four components are scored from 0 (no limitations) to 5 (max limitations) as the examiner's perception of remembering instructions, spoken language ability, word finding and comprehension. Component scores are summed into a total ADAS-cog score ranging from 0-75, with low scores indicating better cognitive performance.
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Phonemic Fluency (Words Beginning With Letter "D")
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Verbal fluency tests are a kind of psychological test in which participants have to say as many words as possible from a category in 60 seconds. This category (words beginning with letter "D") is phonemic. Higher scores indicate better cognition.
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Semantic Verbal Fluency (Naming Animals)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Verbal fluency tests are a kind of psychological test in which participants have to say as many words as possible from a category in 60 seconds. This category (naming animals) is semantic. Higher scores indicate better cognition.
Baseline, 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Geschwind, MD, PhD, UCSF Memory & Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Bruce L. Miller, MD, UCSF Memory & Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Clinical Trials on Quinacrine

3
Subscribe