Trial to Compare the Effects of Either Telmisartan (40-80 mg PO Once Daily) or Ramipril (5-10 mg PO Once Daily) on Renal Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

November 7, 2013 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Forced Titration, Parallel Group Comparison, Multicenter Trial to Compare the Effects of Either Telmisartan (40-80 mg p.o. Once Daily) or Ramipril (5-10 mg p.o. Once Daily) on Renal Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of 9 weeks treatment with either telmisartan or ramipril on NO bioavailability in the renal vasculature, measured as renal plasma flow (RPF) in response to NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (LNMMA) infusion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study was designed as a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and normo- or microalbuminuria over a treatment period of 9 weeks.

After a 4 week Run-in period, patients will be randomised to one of the treatment groups and receive either Telmisartan 40 - 80 mg or Ramipril 5 - 10 mg. The treatment regimen is a forced titration with the lower dose given for 3 weeks and the higher dose given for the rest of the treatment period summing up to 9 weeks of treatment. During the treatment period, 3 visits to the investigator will be scheduled in order to control blood pressure, renal function parameters and safety. In addition, parameters of endothelial function in the renal vasculature, based on a nephrological clearance investigation and a provocation with L-NMMA will be measured at baseline and after 9 weeks of treatment.

Study Hypothesis:

Due to the exploratory nature of the trial, the primary objective to evaluate the effect on RPF in response to L-NMMA infusion at baseline and after 9 weeks of therapy with either telmisartan 80 mg or ramipril 10 mg was not planned to be addressed by a test of prespecified hypotheses.

Comparison(s):

The change in RPF from baseline (Visit 4) to the end of treatment (Visit 7) in response to L-NMMA infusion was to be calculated as the change from the pre L-NMMA infusion (S1) to the end of the L-NMMA infusion (S2). A comparison of treatment groups was to be made using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with pooled centre and treatment included as main effects and RPF (in response to L NMMA infusion) at baseline as a covariate. The treatment group difference, adjusted for the other factors in the model, was to be presented with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and a test of statistical significance. The model was also to be used to provide analysis results for the within treatment group changes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Montpellier, France
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
      • Nürnberg, Germany, 90402
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Nürnberg, Germany, 90471
        • Universität Erlangen-Nurnberg
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Edificio de Medicina Comunitaria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertensive patients aged 30-80 years with type 2 diabetes, normo- or microalbuminuria, GFR > 80 mL/min (Cockroft-Gault)

Exclusion Criteria: None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline of renal plasma flow (RPF) in response to L-NMMA infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in response to L-NMMA infusion at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of filtration fraction (FF) in response to L-NMMA infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of renal vascular resistance (RVR) in response to L-NMMA infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of RPF in response to L-arginine infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of GFR in response to L-arginine infusion at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of FF in response to L-arginine infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of RVR in response to L-arginine infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse rate (PR) in response to L-NMMA infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of MAP and PR in response to L-arginine infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of the laboratory parameters angiotensin II (ANG II), aldosterone, asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), L-arginine, urinary nitrate/nitrite (UNOx), and urinary albumin excretion at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of the pre-L-NMMA RPF at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of the pre-L-NMMA GFR at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of the pre-L-NMMA FF at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of the pre-L-NMMA RVR at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of the urinary excretion parameters creatinine, sodium, potassium, and urea at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Blood pressure response and control at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of central blood pressure and augmentation index (by pulse wave analysis) at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of RPF in response to Vitamin C infusion at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of GFR in response to Vitamin C infusion at the end of treatment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of FF in response to Vitamin C infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of RVR in response to Vitamin C infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Change from baseline of MAP and PR in response to Vitamin C infusion at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: week -2 and 9 weeks
week -2 and 9 weeks
Changes from base line in routine laboratory data at the end of the study
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Changes in vital signs
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
Changes from screening in physical examination at the end of the study
Time Frame: - 4 weeks and 9 weeks
- 4 weeks and 9 weeks
Changes from screening in ECG at the end of the study
Time Frame: - 4 weeks and 9 weeks
- 4 weeks and 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Study Completion

July 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Telmisartan

3
Subscribe