Safety and Efficacy of the BrainPort™ Balance Device to Improve Balance in Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction

October 8, 2008 updated by: Wicab

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the BrainPort™ Balance Device When Used to Improve Postural Control in Subjects With Bilateral Vestibular Disorders

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the BrainPort™ balance device is safe and effective in the treatment of balance disorders in patients with Bilateral Vestibular Dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

People with Bilateral Vestibular Dysfunction (BVD) often experience disabling symptoms, greatly affecting their quality of life and ability to work. Current vestibular treatment does not always allow these patients to fully recover. Many patients either do not improve or reach a plateau with conventional vestibular rehabilitation, and still have difficulty with daily function. The BrainPort™ balance device is intended to provide information about head position to the brain through electrotactile stimulation of the tongue to improve balance in subjects with vestibular disorders.

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized double-blinded study comparing the postural stability of BVD subjects using the BrainPort™ balance device to postural stability of control subjects using a sham device and respective baseline measures for each group. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether electrotactile stimulation of the tongue, using the BrainPort™ balance device, can improve postural stability, as measured by improvement in performance of the composite Computerized Dynamic Posturography using the NeuroCom® Sensory Organization Test in subjects with chronic bilateral vestibular dysfunction (BVD). The secondary objectives are to evaluate improvement in quality of life, as measured by the Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), and to demonstrate a decreased number of falls on the NeuroCom® Sensory Organization Test. In addition, we will monitor the number of falls that occur during subjects' normal activities of daily living. The long-term objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy when the device is used over a one-year period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kent, United Kingdom, ME7 5NY
        • Medway Balance Centre
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin, Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented history of acquired bilateral vestibular dysfunction for a duration of at least one year which has been unsuccessfully treated or reached a plateau with conventional vestibular rehabilitation.
  • No greater than 2 successful attempts out of 6 on the NeuroCom Equitest Sensory Organization Tests 5 and 6.
  • Failure on the Rotary Chair Vestibulo-ocular Reflex (VOR) Test as evidenced by a gain of less than or equal to -2 standard deviations at frequencies of .025, and .05 Hz.
  • Normal corrected vision (20/40 or better).
  • Able to read and understand the informed consent form, and willing to sign the informed consent form.
  • Willing to complete all follow-up evaluations required by the study protocol.
  • Able to stand for a period of 20 minutes in a stationary position with weight evenly distributed without moderate pain, muscle cramping or numbness in the lower extremities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disorders other than bilateral vestibular disorder, as determined by medical history and neurological screening procedure.
  • Current oral health problems as determined by health questionnaire and an examination of the oral cavity.
  • Cigarette smokers and those who use chewing tobacco.
  • Currently taking either benzodiazepine or barbiturate medication.
  • Any medical condition as determined by the health questionnaire that would interfere with performance on the postural stability evaluation tests.
  • Known neuropathies of tongue or skin tactile system.
  • Peripheral neuropathies of the lower extremities.
  • Prior exposure to BrainPort™ balance device (does not apply to control group subjects who cross over).
  • Subjects who are unwilling or unable to adhere to all study requirements, including completion of the training period, evaluation tests, and return to clinic for a follow-up visit.
  • Subjects who have undergone middle ear or other surgery with sacrifice or damage to the chorda tympani, lingual, or hypoglossal nerve.
  • Subjects who have an implanted device such as a pacemaker or defibrillator.
  • If the subject is female, she is pregnant.
  • If the subject is unwilling to discontinue medications for dizziness or imbalance 48 hours prior to beginning the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Computerized Dynamic Posturography using the NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT) composite score, taken at baseline, 1 week, 8 weeks and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)
Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Dynamic Gait Index (DGI)
Number of falls on the NeuroCom SOT
Functional Objective Tests i.e. standing with eyes closed, on one leg, etc.
All tests taken at baseline, 1 week, 8 weeks and 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yuri P Danilov, PhD, Wicab

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2005

Study Completion

December 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 9, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2008

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vestibular Disease

Clinical Trials on Electrotactile sensory substitution

3
Subscribe