Home Sampling Versus Conventional Sampling for Screening of Urogenital Chlamydia Trachomatis in Young Men and Women.

March 2, 2010 updated by: Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Home Sampling Versus Conventional Sampling for Screening of Urogenital Chlamydia Trachomatis in Young Men and Women. - A Randomised Control Trial

Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection in Norway. Urogential C.trachomatis infection can easily be treated with antibiotics. However, left untreated it is a major cause of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) that can lead to complications such as infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic pain in women. Most infections are asymptomatic and many do not seek the doctor for testing. Therefore cases remain undetected and untreated.We want to determine the efficacy and feasibility of screening for urogenital C. trachomatis infection with home sampling (intervention) compared to the current strategy of conventional sampling at the doctor's office (control) in identifying men and women aged 18-25 years with urogenital C.trachomatis infection (Part A). We also want to identify factors influencing the acceptability of home sampling for C.trachomatis infections (Part B)and determine factors associated with C.trachomatis infections (Part C).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study design The different objectives will be addressed through a complex design with several sub-studies.

Part A is a randomised control trial where we compare the intervention group who will be offered home-sampling and recieve a package by mail (containing information on urogenital C.trachomatis infections, sampling eqiupment for urine tests and a questionnaire) with a control group who will continue with todays system of conventional sampling at the doctores office (no intervention). The study population are all men and women between 18-25 years of age in Rogaland County in Norway. The population register will be used to randomly assigne to either the intervention group or the control group.The intervention group will be asked to take a urine sample and send this by mail to the laboratory for analysis within three months after the invitation, and to fill out and return a questionnaire. For the ones in the control group all samples(urethral or cervical swabs or urine samples)taken within the same three months will be sendt to the same laboratory. In this part of the study we will measure the yield ratio for the tested, diagnosed and treated in the two groupsafter the study period of three months. All samples either obtained at home or at the physician's office, will be analyzed by BDProbeTec ET Chlamydia Amplified DNA assay. This is a well documented Nucleid Acid amplification method. Samples will be analysed according to manufactures instructions. Data on number of tested and diagnosed in the two groups will be collected from Stvanger University Hospital. Data on number of treated will be collected from the Norwegain Prescription Database by merging the study dataset with their datafiles. This way we will recive information on who has received treatment for C.rachomatis within one month after after a positive C.trachomatis test.

In Part B a case-cohort from the intervention group (Part A) consisting of a random selection of respondents and non-respondents will be used to determine the feasibility of home sampling as a screening strategy by measuring the risk (OR) related to different factors that determined response. Data are collected through selfadminitered questionnaires.

Part C is a cross sectional study consisting of all respondents in the intervention group. In this part we will measure Prevalence Ratio(PR) of urogential C.trachomatis infections associated with different factors by comparing C.trachomatis positive and C.trachomatis negative in the intervention group.

Part D is an economic study which will be addressed in a separate protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

41719

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Norway
      • Oslo, Norway, 0403
        • Norwegain Institute of Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All persons in the population register in Rogaland County from 18-25 years of age (born between 1/1-1980 - 31/12 -1987) registered 01.11.05. Per 11.11.2005 the size of this population was 41 793. The age cut off is decided because this is the age group with the highest incidence of Chlamydia infections.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All persons in the population register in Rogaland born between 1/1-1980 - 31/12 -1987 registered as:

    • living abroad (including Svalbard) - 6 persons
    • without (permanent) address - 49 persons
    • with client address- 6 persons with secret adress - 16 persons
    • military - 1 person

In total 78 persons were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Yield ratio tested for uro-genital C.trachomatis infection
Yield ratio diagnosed for uro-genital C.trachomatis infection
Yield ratio treated for uro-genital C.trachomatis infection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Investigators

  • Study Director: Preben Aavitsland, MD, NIPH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Study Completion

September 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2010

Last Verified

January 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2.2005.1223

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mass Screening

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Netherlands

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe