Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation

September 19, 2011 updated by: Samsung Medical Center
The aim of this retrospective single center study was to evaluate the clinical utility of histological and immunohistochemical analyses of specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who underwent EUS-FNA to evaluate solid pancreatic or peripancreatic lesions from January 2009 to July 2010 in Samsung Medical Center,

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent EUS-FNA to evaluate solid pancreatic or peripancreatic lesions from January 2009 to July 2010

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unavailable data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
EUS-FNA
tissue samples were harvested from 116 patients undergoing EUS-FNA of solid masses for cytologic smear and histological analysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the diagnostic accuracy of cytology, histology, and combined analysis of specimens obtained by EUS-FNA for pancreatic or peripancreatic solid masses
Time Frame: at least 6 months after surgery or clinical follow up
The first, pre-op checked each diagnostic accuracy of cytology, histology, and combined analysis by EUS-FNA. and then, finaly diagnosis following surgery or clinical follow up for at least 6 months was re-check with diagnosic accuracy of cytology, histology, and combined analysis pre-diagnosed by EUS-FNA
at least 6 months after surgery or clinical follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011-01-044

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Mass

Clinical Trials on EUS-FNA

3
Subscribe