Darbepoetin Administration to Preterm Infants

January 7, 2019 updated by: University of New Mexico

A Randomized, Masked, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Darbepoetin Alfa Administered to Preterm Infants

Infants born prematurely do not increase production of the primary red cell growth factor, erythropoietin (Epo), and often develop an anemia called the "anemia of prematurity." The anemia of prematurity is the most common anemia seen in neonates, and is due to a failure of Epo production. Human recombinant Epo (rHuEpo), given three to five times a week, is successful in treating the anemia of prematurity. A slightly modified, long-acting version of rHuEpo, called darbepoetin alfa (darbepoetin), is now available and has proven effective in increasing hematocrit (red blood cell levels) in adults. In addition to its red cell stimulating properties, recent evidence has shown that rHuEpo is protective in the developing or injured brain. We have designed a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled study to determine the safety and short and long term efficacy of darbepoetin. At this time, darbepoetin has been studied primarily in adults and pediatric patients, but there is evidence from pilot studies that darbepoetin would be useful in the neonatal setting as well. It also may well improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates. We hypothesize that: 1. The administration of darbepoetin to preterm infants 500 to 1,250 grams birth weight will result in increased reticulocyte counts and decreased transfusions compared to placebo; and 2. The administration of darbepoetin will be associated with an increased mental developmental index at 18-22 months compared to placebo.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein, Darbepoetin alfa (Darbepoetin) has been developed by Amgen Inc. and has been shown to be effective in increasing hematocrit using once weekly or once every other week dosing in adults with anemia due to end stage renal disease or cancer. However, it is presently being evaluated for use in children with hyporegenerative anemias, and has not yet been evaluated for use in infants with anemia of prematurity. Preterm infants respond to human recombinant erythropoietin (Epo) by increasing reticulocytes, yet the multiple subcutaneous doses diminish its routine use in the NICU. With the possibility of once a week or once every other week dosing, the use of Darbepoetin in this population appears promising. While it is likely that the use of red cell growth factors such as rHuEpo or darbepoetin will not eliminate the need for all erythrocyte transfusions in all infants, it is reasonable to postulate that the use of darbepoetin will eliminate the need for transfusion in some preterm infants, and reduce the need in others. European studies evaluating rHuEpo in preterm infants have successfully decreased donor exposure to 1 per patient. Our goal is to achieve similar success, which we define as a donor exposure of ≤1 donor per infant in clinical practice. This can be achieved through the use of red cell growth factors, judicious use of blood work for monitoring, and stringent transfusion guidelines. By decreasing total transfusions to <4 per infant, we can achieve this goal of ≤1 donor exposure per infant.

There will remain a population of extremely small, extremely ill infants in whom phlebotomy losses exceed the capacity to increase red cell mass through the use of Epo. Some investigators believe a combination of single donor erythrocyte transfusions and recombinant erythropoietin can serve to maintain an adequate circulating erythrocyte volume. A reasonable algorithm can be developed to assist in these determinations only through continued research. Continued critical evaluation of transfusion criteria, outcomes, new technologies limiting phlebotomy loss, and novel biologic and pharmacologic treatments can only serve to improve the care of ELBW infants who are highest risk for repeated transfusions. Our research aim is to study the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin in preterm infants in order to improve the outcomes of preterm infants by significantly decreasing the number of transfusions. Moreover, improving neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants continues to be a goal for neonatal care providers that might begin to be approached through darbepoetin therapy. This study differs from previous erythropoietin studies in the following ways:

  1. Darbepoetin will be compared to placebo and to rHuEpo, allowing two thirds of the patients to receive some form of red cell growth factor, and allowing SC dosing to occur once a week in the darbepoetin recipients compared with the usual three times a week SC dosing in the rHuEpo recipients (those in the placebo group will not receive sham injections)
  2. Dosing will begin 1-2 days earlier on average than in any previously published study
  3. Transfusion guidelines are the most rigorous applied to date, and will be used at sites that are all at altitudes > 4,000 feet
  4. A target Epo concentration of >500 mU/mL in the treatment group is proposed in order to evaluate neurodevelopmental differences between groups, and the study is powered to determine a difference between treatment groups and placebo

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • University of Colorado
    • Utah
      • Ogden, Utah, United States, 84403
        • McKay-Dee Hospital
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84103
        • LDS Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 hour to 2 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 500-1250 grams birth weight
  • less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation
  • less than 2 days of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe hemorrhagic disease
  • severe hemolytic disease
  • DIC
  • seizures
  • hypertension
  • thromboses
  • receiving erythropoietin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Darbepoetin alfa injection
Darbepoetin alfa 10 mics/kg/week subcutaneous injection x 10 weeks or until 35 completed weeks Drug: Darbepoetin alfa Other names: Aranesp Darbe SC injection
darbepoetin alfa injection 10 mics/kg once a week SC for 10 weeks or until 35 completed weeks
Other Names:
  • Darbe
  • aranesp
Active Comparator: erythropoietin alfa injection
Epo 400 units/kg three times a week SC x 10 weeks or until 35 completed weeks Drug: erythropoietin other names: epogen Epo SC injection
Epo 400 units/kg 3 x weekly SC for 10 weeks or until 35 completed weeks gestation
Other Names:
  • procrit, epoetin alfa
Placebo Comparator: placebo/control
Sham injection
sham injection other names: not applicable
Other Names:
  • placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Transfusions During Hospitalization
Time Frame: From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
Composite Cognitive Score at 18-22 Months Corrected Age
Time Frame: 18-22 months
Bayley Scale of Infant Development Composite Cognitive Score. The total composite score is reported, ranging from the lowest score of 55 to the highest score of 145. Lower values specify worse outcome.
18-22 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematocrit
Time Frame: From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
Reticulocyte Count
Time Frame: at day 60 of study
absolute retic count measured at the end of study
at day 60 of study
Volume of Transfusions
Time Frame: From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
Epo Concentrations
Time Frame: peak from birth to 36 weeks gestational age
peak from birth to 36 weeks gestational age
Object Permanence Scores at 18-22 Months
Time Frame: 18-22 months
Scores are 0-3, with 3 being the best score.
18-22 months
Overall Neurodevelopmental Impairment at 18-22 Months (Visual Impairment, Hearing Impariment, Cerebral Palsy, or Cognitive Score <85/<70 (NDI/Moderate NDI)
Time Frame: 18-22 months
18-22 months
Incidence of Retinopathy of Prematurity Stage 3 or Greater
Time Frame: From birth to 36 weeks gestational age
From birth to 36 weeks gestational age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robin K Ohls, MD, University of New Mexico
  • Principal Investigator: Robert D Christensen, MD, McKay-Dee Hospital, Ogden, Utah
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Wiedmeier, MD, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Principal Investigator: Adam Rosenberg, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 06-139

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Will enter in DASH if appropriate

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe