Safety, Efficacy and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With PAH Rapidly Switched From Epoprostenol to Remodulin

January 3, 2013 updated by: United Therapeutics

Rapid Switch From Intravenous Epoprostenol to Intravenous Remodulin® (Treprostinil Sodium) in Patients With Stable Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Safety, Efficacy and Treatment Satisfaction

The purpose of this 8-week study is to compare the effects of switching from therapy with epoprostenol or Flolan to IV Remodulin. This study will also assess the effect that changing to Remodulin will have on patient satisfaction with their treatment and impact on quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), which is defined as an elevation in pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, is a severe hemodynamic abnormality common to a variety of diseases and syndromes. Elevation in pulmonary arterial pressure causes an increase in right ventricular afterload, impairing right ventricular function and ultimately leading to inactivity and death. The goal of PAH treatment is to lengthen survival time, to ameliorate symptoms of PAH and to improve health related quality of life (HRQOL).

Remodulin® (treprostinil sodium), a stable analogue of prostacyclin, possesses potent pulmonary and systemic vasodilatory and platelet anti-aggregatory actions in vitro and in vivo. Recently, Remodulin received FDA approval for intravenous therapy based upon bioequivalence of the IV and SC routes of administration. Remodulin is more chemically stable than epoprostenol and may offer potential safety and convenience advantages compared to intravenous epoprostenol that may impact Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and/or patient satisfaction. Unlike epoprostenol, Remodulin does not need to be mixed daily and is stable at room temperature eliminating the need for ice packs. Furthermore, since Remodulin remains in the body longer than epoprostenol (4 hrs instead of less than 5 minutes) there is less risk of cardiovascular collapse from a sudden interruption of infusion, such as a line clog. In an open-label study in Europe, patients who were using a type of portable medication pump called the CADD Legacy pump were rapidly switched from Flolan to Remodulin with no serious side effects. This study will examine effects of switching from therapy with epoprostenol or Flolan to IV Remodulin and compare changes in HRQOL and treatment satisfaction before and after rapid switch from epoprostenol to Remodulin in patients with pulmonary hypertension using the CADD legacy pump.

Participation in this study will last approximately 10 weeks. Study procedures include routine blood tests, medical history, physical exams, disease evaluation, exercise tests and patient questionnaires. Participants will have 4 visits during the study and will spend at least 1 night in the hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Diagnosis of Idiopathic or Familial Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)or PAH associated with a collagen vascular disease or PAH associated with congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunt repaired greater than 5 years prior to study entry or PAH associated with portal hypertension with mild or moderate hepatic dysfunction (Grade of A or B on the Child-Pugh Classification Scale)or PAH associated with drug or toxins or CTEPH
  • WHO Class II-III
  • Currently receiving intravenous epoprostenol therapy for at least three months and a stable dose for at least one month.
  • Have central intravenous catheter
  • Optimally treated with conventional pulmonary hypertension therapy and clinically stable for at least one month.
  • Mentally and physically capable of learning to administer Remodulin using an intravenous infusion pump.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nursing or pregnant woman
  • Have any other type of PAH due to conditions other than noted in the above inclusion criteria, including but not limited to PAH related to thrombotic or embolic disease
  • Have any other disease that is associated with pulmonary hypertension (e.g. sickle cell anemia, schistosomiasis)
  • Changes to chronic PAH therapy (i.e., new therapy added within last 30 days[including but not limited to oxygen, a different category of vasodilator, a diuretic, digoxin, bosentan, sildenafil] or PAH medication discontinued within 7 days of study entry.
  • Received any prostacyclin or prostacyclin analog except epoprostenol in the past 3 months.
  • Central venous line infection within the past 30 days.
  • Previous documented evidence of significant parenchymal lung disease
  • Evidence or history of left-sided heart disease
  • Musculoskeletal disorder or any other disease, which is thought to limit ambulation, or be connected to a machine that is not portable
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, or active infection.
  • Use of investigational drug within past 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
rapid switch from intravenous epoprostinol to intravenous remodulin on the CADD ambulatory pump
Other Names:
  • Remodulin
  • Flolan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in the Distance Transversed During the 6 Minute Walk Test From Baseline to Week 8.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Borg Dyspnea Score Immediately After Six Minute Walk Test From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The Borg dyspnea score is a 10-point scale rating the maximum level of dyspnea experienced during the 6-minute walk test. The Borg dyspnea score was assessed immediately following the 6-minute walk test. Scores ranged from 0 (for no shortness of breath) to 10 (for greatest shortness of breath ever experienced).
Baseline and Week 8
Change in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Classification of PAH From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8

Class I: Patients with pulmonary hypertension but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain, or near syncope.

Class II: Patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. These patients are comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope.

Class III: Patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain, or near syncope.

Class IV: Patients with pulmonary hypertension with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. These patients manifest signs of right heart failure. Dyspnea and/or fatigue may be present even at rest. Discomfort is increased by any physical activity.

Baseline and Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Dyspnea From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The presence or absence of dyspnea was documented. If present, the intensity of dyspnea was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Edema From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
The presence or absence of edema was documented. If present, the intensity of edema was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Orthopnea From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The presence or absence of orthopnea was documented. If present, the intensity of orthopnea was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Dizziness From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The presence or absence of dizziness was documented. If present, the intensity of dizziness was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Fatigue From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The presence or absence of fatigue was documented. If present, the intensity of fatigue was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Syncope From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The presence or absence of syncope was documented. If present, the intensity of syncope was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Symptoms of Chest Pain From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The presence or absence of chest pain was documented. If present, the intensity of chest pain was rated mild, moderate, or severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Effectiveness Score on Treatment Satisfaction Scale From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is a validated instrument that measures four major dimensions of patient satisfaction with medications: effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction. TSQM Scale scores are computed by adding the items loading on each factor. The lowest possible score is subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that should be multiplied by 100 (scale 0-100). A low score indicates low satisfaction and a high score indicates high satisfaction with treatment.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Side-Effects Score on Treatment Satisfaction Scale From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is a validated instrument that measures four major dimensions of patient satisfaction with medications: effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction. TSQM Scale scores are computed by adding the items loading on each factor. The lowest possible score is subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that should be multiplied by 100 (scale 0-100). A low score indicates low satisfaction and a high score indicates high satisfaction with treatment.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Convenience Score on Treatment Satisfaction Scale From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is a validated instrument that measures four major dimensions of patient satisfaction with medications: effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction. TSQM Scale scores are computed by adding the items loading on each factor. The lowest possible score is subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that should be multiplied by 100 (scale 0-100). A low score indicates low satisfaction and a high score indicates high satisfaction with treatment.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Global Satisfaction Score on Treatment Satisfaction Scale From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is a validated instrument that measures four major dimensions of patient satisfaction with medications: effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction. TSQM Scale scores are computed by adding the items loading on each factor. The lowest possible score is subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that should be multiplied by 100 (scale 0-100). A low score indicates low satisfaction and a high score indicates high satisfaction with treatment.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Score on Quality of Life Questionnaire From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) is a health related quality of life instrument specific to PAH. The total score can range from 0 -75; the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Patient Impression of Change in Symptoms of PAH From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Subjects were asked to compare their symptoms of PAH as compared to 8 weeks prior and rate as much better, somewhat better, about the same, somewhat worse, or much worse.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Patient Impression of Change on Time Spent Dealing With Therapy From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Subjects were asked to compare their previous experience with Flolan and rate how much time was spent dealing with intravenous Remodulin therapy as much less, somewhat less, about the same, somewhat more, or much more.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Patient Impression of Change of Satisfaction With Therapy From Baseline to Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Subjects were asked to compare their previous experience with Flolan and rate satisfaction with intravenous Remodulin therapy over the past two weeks as much more satisfied, more satisfied, about the same, less satisfied, or much less satisfied.
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Weekly Time Spent to Gather/Set-up Materials Associated With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Weekly Time Spent to Connect Drug With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Weekly Time Spent to Change Dressing With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Weekly Time Spent to Prepare Drug With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Number of Times Daily Required to Disconnect Infusion Pump With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Number of Times Daily Required to Check Infusion Pump With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change in Total Number of Times Daily Infusion Pump Alarms With Intravenous Remodulin Therapy Compared to Same Activities With Intravenous Epoprostenol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Baseline and Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Omar Minai, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 8, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on treprostinil sodium

Subscribe