Effect of Glucosamine on Joint Structure and Quality of Life (JOG)

June 12, 2011 updated by: University of Pittsburgh

Development of Biomarker and Functional Assessment Tools to Evaluate the Effect of Glucosamine on Joint Structure and Quality of Life

The goal of this study is 1) to develop a biomarker of of cartilage synthesis by determining if there is a relationship between changes in the status of knee cartilage and the amount of a biomarker called CTX-II in urine. 2) We will also characterize people who have experienced cartilage loss and/or reduced functional ability using performance tests and a questionnaire. 3) The administration of glucosamine in a beverage for six months will be used to promote the alteration in cartilage status and improve function in people with mild to moderate joint pain. A secondary goal will be to assess the effect of glucosamine on the skin in a small subset of women.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Reduced knee function is a significant cause of physical limitations and disability. As cartilage deteriorates due to aging, wear-and-tear, injury, or disease, joint space narrowing and pain can develop. The lost of articular cartilage arises from an imbalance between cartilage synthesis and cartilage degradation. When cartilage needs to be remodeled, enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade type II collagen. It now may be possible to use new molecular markers of cartilage degradation to assess the progression of joint loss in comparison with radiographic changes of the knee joint. Urinary excretion of C-terminal cross linking telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II) is a new molecular marker of cartilage tissue degradation metabolism.

Recent evidence suggests that glucosamine, a dietary supplement, may provide some relief from joint pain and may increase the functional ability to participate in activities of daily living. This may be a result of these dietary supplements stimulating tissue repair such as cartilage in the affected joints, or by inhibiting the degradation of cartilage through an inhibition of enzymes. Moreover, Braham, Dawson, & Goodman (2003) reported increases in function in adults with knee pain following 12 -weeks of glucosamine supplementation. It is unclear, however, if glucosamine delivered via a liquid carrier would improve physical function and impact quality of life measures in people who have experienced loss of knee cartilage.

Glucosamine is a precursor for glycosaminoglycans, which are a major component of both joint cartilage and skin. Potential benefits of glucosamine on skin have been reported previously. It is possible that glucosamine in a beverage might also improve skin parameters over time.

Comparisons: 100 men and women with mild to moderate joint pain taking a liquid with glucosamine, compared to 100 men and women with mild to moderate joint pain taking a liquid with placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

201

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female or male (female only for skin sub-study)
  • 35-65 years of age (40 -65 for skin sub-study)
  • Willingness to provide informed consent
  • Willingness to be randomized to glucosamine or placebo
  • Knee pain on more days than not for at least one month in past year
  • Sum of WOMAC pain subscales between 300 and 500 inclusive
  • Ability to read and understand English
  • Ability to understand study procedures
  • Dry skin for sub-study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Plans for elective surgery in the next 12 months Plans to move out of the area in the next 12 months
  • Concurrent medical/arthritic disease that could confound or interfere with evaluation of pain or efficacy including inflammatory arthritis
  • Spine or hip pain of sufficient magnitude to interfere with the evaluation of the knee
  • Isolated patellofemoral disease manifested by primarily anterior knee pain in the absence of tibiofemoral radiographic finding
  • History of arthroscopy of the affected knee within 6 months prior to study entry
  • Allergy to,or history of significant clinical or laboratory adverse experience associated with acetaminophen or glucosamine
  • Inability to undergo a MRI of knee
  • Inability to walk without a cane or other assistive device
  • Liver or kidney disease
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Women who are currently pregnant or nursing, pregnant within the previous six months, or planning on becoming pregnant within the next 6 months
  • Unwilling to use double barrier method of contraception
  • Alcohol use in excess of 3 mixed drinks/day
  • Corticosteroid treatment
  • Sustained use of NSAIDS including aspirin in anti-inflammatory doses may be used for treatment of pain other than knee pain, if such use is intermittent
  • Topical analgesics
  • Other medical therapy for arthritis within one month prior to entry
  • Participation in another clinical study with an investigational agent within the last 4 weeks
  • Have taken glucosamine in past 3 months, chondroitin, Sam-E, MSM or other dietary supplements for knee pain within the past 6 months
  • Have taken a bisphosphonate medication that affects bone turnover in the past 6 months
  • Initiation of physical therapy or muscle conditioning program within 2 months prior to study entry
  • Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid or congeners into the knee within past 12 months.
  • Concurrent use of tetracycline, anticoagulants, dietary supplements or other complementary or alternative regimens for joint pain
  • History of knee or hip replacement
  • Weight exceeds 285 in men or 250 in women.
  • Have had any of the following cancers: Acute Leukemia, Brain, Chronic Leukemia, Esophagus, Liver,Lung, Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Pancreas, Skin Melanoma, and Stomach.
  • Have taken any of the following doctor prescribed medications for arthritis: Methotrexate, Plaquenil, Hydroxychloroquine, Enbrel, Etanercept, Remicade, Infliximab, Arava, Leflunomide, Gold shots or pills, Prednisone pills, steroid pills, or glucocorticoid pills taken by mouth, Sulfasalazine, Kineret, Anakinra, Humira, and Adalimumab.
  • Kellgren-Lawrence score of 4 (severe) in both knees based on x-ray.
  • Anterior knee pain only with normal x-ray results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2
1500 mg of lite lemonade
16 oz lite lemonade 1 time daily for 6 months
Other Names:
  • Minute Maid
Active Comparator: 1
1500 mg glucosamine in 16 oz lite lemonade 1 time daily for 6 months
1500 mg in 16 oz lite lemonade, once per day for 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Urinary excretion of CTX-II at 3 and 6 months post intervention
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
Measurement of bone marrow lesions, cartilage volume, as shown by MRI post intervention
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Scores on WOMAC and KOOS of knee pain and function
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
Scores on performance measures
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Jakicic, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: C. Kent Kwoh, M.D., University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 14, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on 16 oz lite lemonade

Subscribe