Use of Ointments in Prevention of Catheter Related Infections in PD

March 16, 2015 updated by: Vanita Jassal, University Health Network, Toronto

A Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study Using Mupirocin Versus Polysporin Triple for the Prevention of Catheter-related Infections in Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in approximately 25% of patients requiring dialysis in Canada. The most common complication is bacterial infection or 'peritonitis'. Peritonitis causes severe acute abdominal pain and may lead to failure of peritoneal dialysis treatment, hospitalization or death, particularly if left untreated. Amongst the strategies used to prevent peritonitis, patients are instructed on the regular use of a prophylactic ointment around the point where the catheter exits from the body. At the present time most centers in Canada routinely prescribe mupirocin ointment for use at the exit site, however newer ointments have become available. One such ointment is Polysporin Triple. The aim of this study is to determine if catheter related infections can be significantly reduced by the routine application of Polysporin Triple in comparison to mupirocin ointment. A multi-centre, randomized, double blind, controlled study is proposed. Participants will be randomized to either mupirocin or Polysporin Triple and followed for 18 months or until the first catheter related infection, death or catheter removal. The difference in catheter related infection rates will be compared between the two groups. We anticipate the results of this study will allow clinicians to prescribe the ointment most likely to reduce infections. By doing so this will reduce the complication rate associated with peritoneal dialysis and, ultimately improve survival.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in approximately 25% of patients requiring dialysis in Canada. The most common PD related complication is infective peritonitis, a syndrome of acute pain, cloudy peritoneal dialysate, and infection. Although many cases of peritonitis can be treated as an outpatient, recurrent or unresolving infections can result in fibrotic changes in the peritoneal membrane, catheter removal or patient death. Gram positive organisms are amongst the commonest causes of PD peritonitis; however, recent trends show an increasing rate of gram negative and fungal infections. Strategies to prevent peritonitis include the use of prophylactic topical mupirocin at the site where the PD catheter exits from the abdominal wall. Despite this and other innovations peritonitis is still diagnosed, on average, in one patient out of every 24 patients followed for a month. The aim of this study is to determine if the incidence of catheter related infections (exit site infection, tunnel infection or peritonitis) is significantly reduced by the routine application of Polysporin Triple in comparison to mupirocin ointment.A multi-centre randomized double blind, controlled study is proposed. Polysporin Triple will be compared against the current standard of care. All patients currently being treated with, or starting onto, peritoneal dialysis will be eligible. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatment arms (mupirocin; Polysporin Triple) and stratified according to a) centre b) vintage (incident versus prevalent), and c) type of PD (chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis vs. automated PD). Patients will be followed for 18 months or until the first catheter related infection, death or catheter removal due to technique failure. Catheter related infections will be strictly defined using current guidelines and categorized into exit site infections, infective peritonitis or tunnel infections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M1P 2V5
        • Scarborough General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able and willing to provide informed consent*
  2. Age over 18 years
  3. Has a peritoneal dialysis catheter in situ and

    • Is established on PD for more than 3 months (prevalent patients)
    • Is undergoing training for or has initiated PD within the last 3 months (incident patients)
  4. Medically stable (as defined by primary nephrologist)
  5. Regularly applying mupirocin ointment to catheter exit site

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of acute renal failure
  2. Catheter related infection at the time of recruitment or within the previous 3 months
  3. Use of an oral or IV antibiotic at the time of randomization or within the previous 1 week.
  4. Known allergy to any component of gentamicin or mupirocin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
Polysporin tRIPLE ointment (topical ointment in widespread use for other skin lesions)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
Mupirocin
topical ointment (already in widespread clinical use)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary endpoint is the time to first catheter related infection.
Time Frame: 2Yrs
2Yrs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Removal of the catheter to prevent or halt progression of a catheter related infection
Time Frame: 2 yrs
2 yrs
Hospitalizations related to catheter related infection
Time Frame: 2 yrs
2 yrs
Death due to catheter-related infection
Time Frame: 2 yrs
2 yrs
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 2yrs
2yrs
Technique failure (i.e. transfer to hemodialysis)
Time Frame: 2yrs
2yrs
Mupirocin or Polysporin Triple resistance
Time Frame: 2yrs
2yrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 17, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Renal Disease

Clinical Trials on Polysporin Triple

3
Subscribe