- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00460564
Study Of GSK1358820 In Patients With Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity
May 25, 2017 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled GSK1358820 Treatment Followed by an Open-Label GSK1358820 Treatment
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both the wrist and finger flexors using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) wrist score.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both the wrist and finger flexors using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) wrist score.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
109
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Fukuoka, Japan, 811-0213
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hiroshima, Japan, 720-0825
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hiroshima, Japan, 728-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 005-0802
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 006-0805
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 053-0803
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Ibaraki, Japan, 302-0112
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 247-8533
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 227-8518
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 253-8558
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 257-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kumamoto, Japan, 860-8518
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 410-1128
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 410-2507
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 410-3293
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 142-8666
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 105-8471
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Yamaguchi, Japan, 740-0021
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:
- Patients with upper limb spasticity who are at least 6 months post stroke and present with spasticity of both the wrist and fingers at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Wrist flexor muscle tone of ≥3 and finger flexor muscle tone of ≥2 on the MAS, and at least one functional disability item (i.e., hygiene, pain, dressing or limb posture) with a rating of ≥2 on the Disabilty Assessment Scale (DAS) at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Male or female between 20 and 80 years of age at the time of informed consent. For males, only those who can practice contraception during the study period are eligible.
- ≥40kg in weight at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Inpatient or outpatient; however, the hospitalization status must remain unchanged during the double-blind phase.
- Written informed consent from the subject him/herself. If the subject's signature is not legible, the attendance of a witness is required.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Bilateral hemiplegia or quadriplegia.
- Presence of fixed contractures of the wrist and/or fingers (absence of range of motion).
- Profound atrophy of the muscles to be injected.
- Previous surgical intervention, phenol block, ethanol block, or muscle afferent block (MAB) for wrist and/or finger spasticity.
- Casting of the study upper limb within 3 months prior to the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Current treatment with intrathecal baclofen.
- Use of peripheral muscle relaxants (dantrolene sodium, suxamethonium chloride, pancuronium bromide, vecuronium bromide, rocuronium bromide).
- Concurrent use of antibiotics that interfere with neuromuscular transmission, such as aminoglycoside antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin sulfate, kanamycin sulfate, gentamicin sulfate, neomycin sulphate, spectinomycin hydrochloride), polypeptide antibiotics (e.g., polymixin B sulfate), lincomycin antibiotics (e.g., lincomycin hydrochloride, clindamycin), and enviomycin sulfate.
- Previous botulinum toxin therapy.
- Diagnosis of systemic neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis).
- Females who are pregnant, nursing, may be pregnant, or planning a pregnancy during the study period.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of study medication (e.g., human serum albumin).
- Presence of psychiatric disorder or impairment of intellectual function that may interfere with the subject's ability to give informed consent or the conduct of the study.
- Bedridden patients.
- Presence of clinically unstable severe cardiovascular disease.
- Presence of clinically significant severe renal, hepatic or respiratory disease.
- Infection or dermatological condition at the proposed injection sites.
- Previous or planned participation in another clinical study (including the lower limb spasticity study of GSK1358820) within 6 months prior to the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Others whom the investigator or sub investigator considers not eligible for the study.
- Clinically significant severe reduction of muscle strength.
- Angle closure glaucoma or its preposition (narrow angle).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: High-Dose BTX
|
botulinum toxin type A
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: High-Dose Placebo
|
Placebo
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Low-Dose BTX
|
botulinum toxin type A
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Low-Dose Placebo
|
Placebo
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Wrist Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12) in the High-dose Groups
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
|
Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated.
In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score.
Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Wrist Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12) in the Low-dose Groups
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
|
Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated.
In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score.
Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the area under the AUC has a negative sign.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAS Wrist Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The investigator assessed MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAS Finger Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The investigator assessed MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Principal Measure From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability).
Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Hygiene From Baseline to week12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Pain From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
DAS score of pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Dressing From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Limb Posture From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Wrist Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The investigator assessed the MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone to 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48.
The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder ([less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Finger Score From at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The investigator assessed the MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48.
The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Principal Measure at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability).
Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Hygiene at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability; 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria.
Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Pain at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The DAS score of Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria.
Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Dressing at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria.
Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Limb Posture at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Weeks 12 to 36 when participants met re-injection criteria.
Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2008
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 13, 2007
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 16, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
May 30, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 25, 2017
Last Verified
May 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BTX108509
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Accident
-
China Medical University HospitalRecruitingCerebrovascular Accident (CVA)Taiwan
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Heart and Stroke Foundation...CompletedStroke | Vascular Accident, Brain | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebral Stroke | Cerebrovascular Stroke | Cerebrovascular Accident, Acute | Apoplexy | CVA | Cerebrovascular ApoplexyCanada
-
Sheba Medical CenterCompletedLate Effects of Cerebrovascular Accident
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)Belgium
-
Sunnyview Rehabilitation HospitalCompletedStroke | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteUnited States
-
Peking University Third HospitalAstraZeneca Investment (China) Co., LtdCompletedCerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteChina
-
Medical University of South CarolinaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedIschemic Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
John DavidsonWashington University School of MedicineWithdrawnIschemic Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingStroke, Ischemic | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)United States
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of