Improving Care for Primary Care Patients With Diabetes and Poor Literacy and Numeracy Skills

April 22, 2010 updated by: Vanderbilt University
The aim of this research will be to perform a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a new diabetes educational intervention that teaches self-management skills that compensate for poor numeracy skills among a sample of primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and low literacy and/or numeracy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS) suggest that over 90 million adult Americans have poor quantitative skills. Numeracy, the ability to understand and use numbers and math skills in daily life, may be particularly important to patients with diabetes because caring for diabetes often requires self-management skills that rely on the daily application of math skills, such as counting carbohydrates, interpreting blood glucose monitoring, applying sliding scale insulin regimens, and calculating insulin to carbohydrate ratios. Presumably diabetes patients with poor numeracy have more difficulty with self-management and are at risk for poorer clinical outcomes, but to date, there are no published studies that rigorously examine the role of numeracy in diabetes. We have recently completed the initial development of a new scale to measure numeracy in patients with diabetes: the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).

The aim of this research will be to perform a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a new diabetes educational intervention that teaches self-management skills that compensate for poor literacy and numeracy skills among a sample of patients with type 2 diabetes and low numeracy or literacy skills. We hypothesize that a group of patients with poor literacy and/or numeracy who are taught self-management skills that accommodate their poor numeracy will have: (1) improved treatment satisfaction and perceived self-efficacy, (2) improved performance in self-management tasks, and (3) improved glycemic control compared to a control group that receives usual education and care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, General Medicine Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
  2. most recent A1C >= 7.5%
  3. Referred to the Diabetes Care Program for diabetes care
  4. Age 18-85; 5. English Speaking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with corrected visual Acuity >20/50 using a Rosenbaum Pocket Vision Screener
  2. Patients with a diagnosis of significant dementia, psychosis, or blindness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Control Arm receives standard diabetes disease management
Receives standard diabetes disease management
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Receives numeracy/literacy sensitive diabetes management
Receives comprehensive literacy/num sensitive diabetes care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
A1C
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient self-management behaviors
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
Patient knowledge
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robb Malone, PharmD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Principal Investigator: Russell L Rothman, MD MPP, Vanderbilt University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2010

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 7-04-NN-16 (ADA)
  • Vanderbilt IRB: 040387
  • UNC IRB: 06-0535

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Control Group

Subscribe