Feasability Study of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of CLI

March 8, 2012 updated by: Harvest Technologies

Feasibility Study of the Safety and Activity of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) for the Treatment of Non Reconstructable Critical Limb Ischemia Due to Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine if concentrated nucleated cells from your own bone marrow, injected or infused into an ischemic limb, will restore sufficient blood flow to avoid amputation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chennai
      • Porur, Chennai, India, 600 116
        • Sri Ramachandra University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of Critical Limb Ischemia per protocol (see diagnostic criteria #2) with regard to the study limb.

    Existence of a PAOD with clinical presentation corresponding to Rutherford Category 4 or Category 5 as defined in the reporting standards adopted by the Society of Vascular Surgeons (table 1)

  2. Patient meets at least one of the following diagnostic criteria in the study limb:

    • Ankle artery occlusion pressure absolute <50 mmHg or ABI <0.4
    • Toe artery occlusive pressure < 40mm Hg or TBI (<0.4)
    • TcPO2 <20 mmHg lying down breathing room air, if available.
  3. There is no reasonable open surgical or endovascular revascularization option as determined by the treating vascular specialist. Factors that may contribute to the determination of inoperability may include:

    • Anatomical considerations

      • No outflow targets
      • No appropriate conduit (i.e. vein for bypass)
      • Long segment occlusions or calcified lesions that predict poor outcome with endovascular approaches.
    • High risk medical conditions

      • Unstable cardiac disease.
      • Renal insufficiency
    • History of prior failed revascularization attempts
    • The patient's unsuitability must be confirmed by 2 qualified physicians.

      • The attending vascular surgeon will provide the primary assessment.
      • The confirmatory opinion must come from a fully licensed physician. (not a resident)
      • If anatomical considerations are invoked, the second physician may be a vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist, cardiologist, or vascular medicine specialist.
      • If medical co-morbidity is deemed the high risk aspect, then the confirmatory opinion may be obtained from an internist, family physician, cardiologist, vascular medicine, nephrologists, or vascular surgeon.
  4. Age >18 years and ability to understand the planned treatment
  5. Subject has read and signed the IRB/IEC approved Informed Consent form
  6. Patients for whom the following medication(s) is prescribed must have a one month stable baseline of appropriate/maximally tolerated therapy prior to enrollment: Plavix/asprin therapy, anticoagulation therapy, cholesterol lowering agent, and or blood pressure medication
  7. Hematocrit ≥ 28.0%, White Blood Cell count ≤ 14,000, Platelet count ≥ 50,000, INR ≤ 1.6 unless on Coumadin, or PTT <1.5 x control (to avoid bleeding complications) Patients on Coumadin will be corrected prior to the procedure and must have an INR<1.6 at the time of randomization/surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy <6 months due to concomitant illnesses
  2. History of bone marrow diseases (especially NHL, MDS) that prohibit transplantation
  3. Terminal renal failure with existing dependence on dialysis
  4. Known active malignancy or results outside of normal limits from the following tests: PAP, Chest X-ray, PSA, Mammogram, Hemocult unless follow-up studies reveal patient to be cancer free..
  5. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1C>10%)
  6. Medical risk that precludes anesthesia (conscious sedation), or ASA Class 5
  7. Life-threatening complications of the ischemia necessitating immediate amputation
  8. Uncorrected iliac artery occlusion on index side
  9. Extensive necrosis of the index limb or other conditions that make amputation inevitable (Rutherford Category 6)
  10. Active clinical infection being treated by antibiotics within one week of enrollment
  11. Treatment with immunosuppressant drugs (including Prednisone > 5 mg per day).
  12. Female who is pregnant or nursing, or of child bearing potential and is not using a reliable birth control method.
  13. Underwent a major cardiovascular surgical procedure (carotid endarterectomy, open arterial aneurysm or bypass surgery, or coronary artery bypass surgery) or an adverse cardiovascular event (stroke or MI) within the 30 days prior to randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
injection of BMAC into ischemic limb
autologous bone marrow aspirate will be concentrated using the SmartPRep2 BMAC system and then injected/infused into ischemic limbs
Other Names:
  • SmartPReP2 BMAC System
Active Comparator: 2
Injection and Infusion of BMAC into ischemic lower limb
autologous bone marrow aspirate will be concentrated using the SmartPRep2 BMAC system and then injected/infused into ischemic limbs
Other Names:
  • SmartPReP2 BMAC System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
avoid amputation
Time Frame: 60 days
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
measurement of hemodynamic response
Time Frame: 60 Days
60 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: R E Arasan, MD, LifeCell India

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arterial Occlusive Diseases

Clinical Trials on centrifuge, laboratory, tabletop (SmartPReP2 BMAC System)

3
Subscribe