Exploration of Safety and Efficacy of AzA 15% Foam Twice a Day in Rosacea

March 30, 2020 updated by: LEO Pharma

A 12-week Exploratory, Multicenter, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Azelaic Acid 15% Foam Twice Daily in Patients With Papulopustular Rosacea

This exploratory study is being performed to determine whether a new form formulation of azelaic acid 15% is effective in the treatment of papulopustular rosecea.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209
    • Kansas
      • Olathe, Kansas, United States, 66062
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89052
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
    • Ohio
      • Mason, Ohio, United States, 45040
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male and female patient at least 18 years of age
  • signed informed consent
  • Papulopustular rosacea with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 50 papules and/or pustules, persistent erythema, and telangiectasia
  • Ability and willingness to accept and comply with treatment and required medical examinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known non-responders to azelaic acid
  • Erythematotelangiectatic, rhinophymatous, ocular, or steroid rosacea
  • Presence of dermatoses that could interfere with the rosacea diagnosis
  • Treatment with isotretinoin in the six months prior to randomization
  • Treatment of the face with topical retinoids during the two weeks prior to randomization
  • Treatment with oral antibiotics during the four weeks prior to randomization
  • Treatment with topical antibiotics
  • Treatment with systemic corticosteroids during 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Treatment of the face with topical corticosteroids during 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Treatment of the face with topical imidazole antimycotics during 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Treatment of the face with topical azelaic acid formulations during 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Use of a sauna during 2 weeks prior to randomization and during the study
  • Facial laser surgery for telangiectasia during 6 weeks prior to randomization
  • Planned concurrent use of any treatment other than study medication that affects rosacea
  • History of hypersensitivity to propylene glycol or any other ingredient of the study drugs
  • Participation in another clinical trial during the last 4 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Azelaic acid foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)
Participants received azelaic acid foam, 15% topically twice daily for 12 weeks
15% foam to be applied topically twice daily
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle foam
Participants received vehicle foam topically twice daily for 12 weeks
Active-ingredient-free vehicle to be applied topically twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count (Sum of Papules and Pustules) Per Participant at End of Study (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)
Time Frame: Baseline and End of Study (Week 12)
Baseline and End of Study (Week 12)
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: At End of Study (Week 12)
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3- Mild to Moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe / Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal (0 to 1).
At End of Study (Week 12)
Grouped Change From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and End of Study (Week 12)
Erythema intensity score: 1 - Clear or almost clear; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
Baseline and End of Study (Week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean of Inflammatory Lesion Count Per Participant at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count Per Participant at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count Per Participant at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Percentage of Participants With Respective Disease Severity Measured by IGA Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3- Mild to Moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe / Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal (0 to 1).
At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in IGA Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3- Mild to Moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe / Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal (0 to 1).
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Erythema intensity score: 1 - Clear or almost clear; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Erythema intensity score: 1 - Clear or almost clear; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Grouped Change From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Erythema intensity score: 1 - Clear or almost clear; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Telangiectasia Intensity Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Telangiectasia intensity score: 1 - None; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Telangiectasia intensity score: 1 - None; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Grouped Change From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Telangiectasia intensity score: 1 - None; 2 - Mild; 3 - Moderate; 4 - Severe
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Investigator's Rating of Overall Improvement at End of Study
Time Frame: At End of Study (Week 12)
Investigator's rating of overall improvement: 1 - excellent improvement; 2 - marked improvement; 3 - moderate improvement; 4 - no change; 5 - deterioration
At End of Study (Week 12)
Patients' Rating of Overall Improvement at End of Study
Time Frame: At End of Study (Week 12)
Patient's rating of overall improvement: 1 - excellent; 2 - good; 3 - fair; 4 - no improvement; 5 - worse
At End of Study (Week 12)
Patients' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Study
Time Frame: At End of Study (Week 12)
Patient's opinion on cosmetic acceptability: 1 - very good; 2 - good; 3 - satisfactory; 4 - poor; 5 - no opinion
At End of Study (Week 12)
Percentage of Participants With IGA Based Therapeutic Success at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: At Weeks 4, 8 and 12
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3- Mild to Moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe / Therapeutic success was defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal (0 to 1).").
At Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With IGA Based Patient Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
Time Frame: At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)
IGA based Patient response was defined as an IGA score of clear, minimal or mild (0, 1, 2).
At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Study (LOCF)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1402140

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Papulopustular Rosacea

Clinical Trials on Azelaic acid

Subscribe