- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00620386
Endotracheal Intubation Using Bonfils Fibrescope Without Neuromuscular Blockade
Comparing Intubating Conditions and Hemodynamic Changes Between Macintosh Laryngoscopy and Bonfils Fibrescope During Endotracheal Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND:
Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) are believed to be the dominating antigens causing bronchospasm and anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Avoidance of these drugs, however, renders compromised intubating conditions and higher morbidity with conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy. Thus, we compared Macintosh laryngoscopy with Bonfils intubation fibrescope without administering NMBDs.
METHODS:
Eighty male and female patients scheduled for elective surgery, aged 15 to 60 years, ASA class II or I, non-obese, with lower risk for difficult intubation were enrolled in this study. They were randomly allocated into the Bonfils group or the Macintosh group (40 each). Following adequate hydration and preoxygenation, midazolam 0.05 mg kg-1 was administered, followed by alfentanil 20 µg kg-1, lidocaine 1.5 mg kg-1, and propofol 2 mg kg-1 intravenously. Tracheal intubation was then carried out using Bonfils intubation fibrescope (Bonfils group) or employing conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy (Macintosh group). The primary outcome measure was the intubating condition, with mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate as secondary outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Sina Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status was class I or II
- body mass index (BMI) < 30
- ability to assume the 'sniffing' position
Exclusion Criteria:
- smokers
- drug users
- pregnant
- expected to present difficult intubation
- history of oesophageal reflux
- any systemic or airway disease
- known allergy to the protocol medications
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
Intubation with Bonfils intubating fiberscope
|
Endotracheal intubation using Bonfils Intubating Fiberscope
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
Intubation with Macintosh laryngoscopy
|
Endotracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
intubating conditions
Time Frame: 7 months
|
7 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
mean arterial pressure (MAP)
Time Frame: 7 months
|
7 months
|
|
heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: 7 months
|
7 months
|
|
Pulse Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)
Time Frame: 7 months
|
7 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Reza Shariat Moharari, MD, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Principal Investigator: Eiman Rahimi, MD, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 105
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Intubation
-
The Catholic University of KoreaCompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Individualized Depth of Endotracheal IntubationKorea, Republic of
-
Aswan UniversityCompletedEndotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope for General Anesthesia | Endotracheal Intubation Risk AssessmentEgypt
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalUniversity Hospital, Bonn; University Hospital, AachenCompletedEndotracheal IntubationGermany
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedEndotracheal IntubationTurkey
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedIntubation, EndotrachealThailand
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknown
-
Manuel Ángel Gómez-RíosCompletedEndotracheal IntubationSpain
-
Manuel Ángel Gómez-RíosCompletedEndotracheal IntubationSpain
Clinical Trials on Bonfils
-
Università Politecnica delle MarcheUnknownDifficult Intubation | Thoracic SurgeryItaly
-
International Institute of Rescue Research and...Unknown
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
Centre Leon BerardCompleted
-
Singapore General HospitalUnknown
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...CompletedEndotracheal IntubationCanada
-
International Institute of Rescue Research and...Unknown
-
International Institute of Rescue Research and...CompletedIntubation | Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation