Efficacy of EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Blockade in Chronic Pancreatitis

May 17, 2017 updated by: Tyler Stevens, The Cleveland Clinic

A Randomized, Triple-Blinded Study of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Celiac Plexus Blockade (EUS-CPB) With Bupivicaine and Triamcinolone vs. Bupivicaine Alone for the Treatment of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis

This is a triple-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial to assess the benefit of triamcinolone injection as a therapeutic measure for control of chronic pancreatitis pain. The treatment group will undergo EUS-CPB with bupivicaine plus triamcinolone ("therapeutic block"). There control group will undergo EUS-CPB with bupivicaine alone ("diagnostic block").

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

There are few effective options for the treatment of abdominal pain in chronic pancreatitis. For the past 20 years, percutaneous injection of anesthetic agents into the celiac plexus (celiac plexus blockade or CPB) has been performed by pain anesthesiologists to diagnose the origin of pancreatic pain (visceral vs. non-visceral). Anesthetic blocks provide very short-term and variable pain relief. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound has been used to provide a transgastric approach to the celiac plexus (EUS-CPB).

Corticosteroids may lengthen the effect of CPB to provide longer-lasting pain relief ("therapeutic block"). Case-series report that about 50% of patients experience partial or complete relief lasting an average of 1-2 months. Combined corticosteroid (triamcinolone) and anesthetic (bupivicaine) has now become standard practice for EUS-CPB. However, there have been no randomized controlled trials to prove that corticosteroid blocks are truly therapeutic (i.e. that they lengthen the effect of the typical "diagnostic" CPB with anesthetics). Randomized controlled trials are needed to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of CPB with corticosteroids.

This is a triple-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial to assess the benefit of triamcinolone injection as a therapeutic measure for control of chronic pancreatitis pain. The treatment group will undergo EUS-CPB with bupivicaine plus triamcinolone ("therapeutic block"). There control group will undergo EUS-CPB with bupivicaine alone ("diagnostic block").

Eligible patients with abdominal pain undergoing EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis or EUS-CPB for pancreatic pain will be recruited. Patients will complete a 2-week run-in period to establish baseline pain scores and opioid consumption. Following the run-in, EUS will be performed. If EUS reveals CP (>4 criteria), patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment groups. 74 patients will be randomized and followed for 2 months after the EUS-CPB. The primary endpoint is an improvement in the pain disability index (PDI) of greater than 10 points at 1 month. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption, duration of pain relief, and quality of life (SF-12).

If this trial shows that the addition of triamcinolone produces a long-lasting (1-month) benefit, then EUS-CPB can be more strongly advocated as a therapeutic option to patients with chronic pancreatitis. If triamcinolone does not produce a benefit over a diagnostic block, then EUS-CPB should be considered a primarily diagnostic measure for differentiation of visceral from non-visceral pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria include:

  • Age >18 yrs
  • Ability for informed consent
  • Chronic pancreatic-type abdominal pain (type B) (11).

Exclusion criteria include:

  • Pregnancy
  • Malignancy
  • Recent acute pancreatitis (within 2 months)
  • Elevated INR (>1.5) or low platelet count (<75 cells/mm3)
  • Allergy to eggs or "caine" anesthetics or corticosteroids; AND
  • Becks depression score>20.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
EUS guided celiac block with bupivicaine and triamcinolone. Patient will undergo endoscopic ultrasound and celiac plexus blockade using an EUS needle inserted into the celiac plexus. 20 cc of injectate will be administered.
Injection of bupivacaine and triamcinolone
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 2
EUS guided celiac block with bupivicaine only. Patient will undergo endoscopic ultrasound and celiac plexus blockade using an EUS needle inserted into the celiac plexus. 20 cc of injectate will be administered.
Injection of bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 month after block
The Pain Disability Index (PDI) measures patients' responses of the extent to which pain limits their abilities to carry out everyday tasks. The index is scored from 0 (no limitation) to 70 (severe limitation). A decrease in score of 10 points or more is regarded as indicating significant improvement in the ability to carry out daily activities.
1 month after block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Score at 1 Month - SF12 Physical Component
Time Frame: 1 month
The SF12 survey measures patients' impressions of their level of health and well-being. The results are reported as two scores: A physical component and a mental component, each of which is reported on a scale of 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (excellent health). Scores that increase from baseline indicate an improvement in patients' feelings of well-being.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 15, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The IPD will not be shared.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe