Comparison of Korean Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Botox in the Treatment of Essential Blepharospasm

May 21, 2008 updated by: Pacific Pharmaceuticals

Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3, Comparative Study of a New Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Botox in the Treatment of Essential Blepharospasm

To compare the efficacy and safety of Korean botulinum toxin A (KbtxA, Pacific Pharmaceuticals, Korea) against Botox in the treatment of essential blepharospasm, we performed a double-blinded, randomized, comparative trial comparing KbtxA and Botox for treatment of blepharospasm in 60 patients of the intention to treat population and 52 patients (26 patients from each group) of the per protocol population. The improvement of severity of spasm (SS) at 4 weeks post-injection as a primary efficacy outcome, qualifying non inferiority to the control group, Changes in eyelid closure force (CF) and functional visual status (FVS) after injection for secondary efficacy outcomes, and adverse effects for safety evaluation. Improvement of SS was noted in 90.3% of the KbtxA group and 86.2% of the Botox group. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in the changes of CF and FVS after injection (p>0.05). Adverse effects developed in 16.1% of the KbtxA group and 27.6% of the Botox group, but no serious adverse events were found in either group. KbtxA was not inferior to Botox in treatment efficacy and was clinically safe with no serious adverse effects when used to treat essential blepharospasm.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Severity of spasm was graded clinically from grade 0 to 4. Primary efficacy outcome was assessed as the number (%) of patients with improved SS of more than 1 score at 4 weeks post-injection. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included the change in scores from baseline on the SS, closing force of eyelids, and functional visual status at 4 weeks post-injection. The duration of action (days), the time interval between injection and the moment that the patient felt the need for retreatment were also assessed as secondary efficacy outcomes.

The number (%) of patients with improvement of SS (primary efficacy outcome) and the change in scores from baseline at 4 weeks post-injection on the severity of spasm, closing force of eyelids, and functional visual status scores were not different between the KbtxA and Botox groups in the analysis of both the ITT and PP populations. Also, the duration of action was similar following KbtxA and Botox injections (two sample t-test, p=0.835). For the non-inferiority trial on primary efficacy outcome, KbtxA was not inferior to Botox in either the ITT or PP populations, as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (-1.76% for ITT, -1.64% for PP) was over the -15% threshold.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients, aged between 18 and 75 years old, had confirmed diagnoses of bilateral essential blepharospasm.
  • The patients were recruited from two botulinum toxin clinics (Yonsei University and Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea) from October 18, 2005 until February 21, 2006.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were not eligible for inclusion in the study if they

    • had undergone either myectomy or neurectomy
    • had received anti-spastic, muscle relaxant medication within 1 month of study entry
    • had been injected previously with BTX-A within 3 months of study entry
    • had any muscle disorder
  • Women with positive urine pregnancy test, or who were pregnant or lactating were also excluded from the study.
  • In addition, patients who had shown hypersensitivity to BTX-A previously were not eligible for inclusion in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Korean botulinum toxin A treatment
Each vial of Botox and KbtxA contained 100 U of BTX-A in a sterile vacuum-derived form without preservatives. Each vial of KbtxA was identical to the placebo (Botox) vial, and all vials were reconstituted with 2.0 mL of 0.9% sterile nonpreserved saline solution to a final dilution of 5 U /0.1 mL. The dose of BTX-A per injection site was 2.5 U to 5 U, and the location, number of injection sites. Using a 30-gauge needle, injections were angled away from the center of lid to reduce the risk of spread into the levator muscle. Injection sites include the upper medial and lateral eyelid margins, lower lateral lid margins, and above the eyebrow.
Other Names:
  • arm1 ; Meditoxin or Neuronox
Placebo Comparator: 2
Botox treatment
Each vial of Botox and KbtxA contained 100 U of BTX-A in a sterile vacuum-derived form without preservatives. Each vial of KbtxA was identical to the placebo (Botox) vial, and all vials were reconstituted with 2.0 mL of 0.9% sterile nonpreserved saline solution to a final dilution of 5 U /0.1 mL. The dose of BTX-A per injection site was 2.5 U to 5 U, and the location, number of injection sites. Using a 30-gauge needle, injections were angled away from the center of lid to reduce the risk of spread into the levator muscle. Injection sites include the upper medial and lateral eyelid margins, lower lateral lid margins, and above the eyebrow.
Other Names:
  • arm1 ; Meditoxin or Neuronox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The improvement of severity of spasm at 4 weeks post-injection as a primary efficacy outcome, qualifying non inferiority to the control group
Time Frame: at 4 weeks post-injection
at 4 weeks post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in eyelid closure force and functional visual status after injection for secondary efficacy outcomes
Time Frame: at 4 weeks post-injection
at 4 weeks post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sang Y Lee, MD, phD, Yonsei University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2008

Last Verified

May 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blepharospasm

Clinical Trials on Korean Botulinum toxin type A (KbtxA) and Botox injection

3
Subscribe